Dataset Information

Can we trust untargeted metabolomics? Results of the metabo-ring initiative, a large-scale, multi-instrument inter-laboratory study.

ABSTRACT: The metabo-ring initiative brought together five nuclear magnetic resonance instruments (NMR) and 11 different mass spectrometers with the objective of assessing the reliability of untargeted metabolomics approaches in obtaining comparable metabolomics profiles. This was estimated by measuring the proportion of common spectral information extracted from the different LCMS and NMR platforms. Biological samples obtained from 2 different conditions were analysed by the partners using their own in-house protocols. Test #1 examined urine samples from adult volunteers either spiked or not spiked with 32 metabolite standards. Test #2 involved a low biological contrast situation comparing the plasma of rats fed a diet either supplemented or not with vitamin D. The spectral information from each instrument was assembled into separate statistical blocks. Correlations between blocks (e.g., instruments) were examined (RV coefficients) along with the structure of the common spectral information (common components and specific weights analysis). In addition, in Test #1, an outlier individual was blindly introduced, and its identification by the various platforms was evaluated. Despite large differences in the number of spectral features produced after post-processing and the heterogeneity of the analytical conditions and the data treatment, the spectral information both within (NMR and LCMS) and across methods (NMR vs. LCMS) was highly convergent (from 64 to 91 % on average). No effect of the LCMS instrumentation (TOF, QTOF, LTQ-Orbitrap) was noted. The outlier individual was best detected and characterised by LCMS instruments. In conclusion, untargeted metabolomics analyses report consistent information within and across instruments of various technologies, even without prior standardisation.

SUBMITTER: Martin JC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4475541 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionProbiotics are live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host. From this definition, accurate enumeration of probiotic products is a necessity. Nonetheless, this definition does not specify the methods for assessing such viability. Colony forming units is the de facto gold standard for enumerating viable in probiotic products. The notion of microbial viability has been anchored in the concept of cultivability, which refers to a cell's capacity to replicate and form colonies on agar media. However, there is a growing consensus that the term "viability" should not be exclusively tied to the ability to cultivate cells. For example, bacterial cells can exist in a Viable But Non-Culturable (VBNC) state, characterized by the maintenance of characteristics such as membrane integrity, enzymatic activity, pH gradients, and elevated levels of rRNA, despite losing the ability to form colonies.MethodsHerein we present the results of a collaborative inter-laboratory ring test for cytometric bacterial quantification. Specifically, membrane integrity fluorescence flow cytometry (FFC) method and the newer impedance flow cytometry (IFC) method have been used. Both methods interrogate single cells in solution for the presence of intact membranes. FFC exploits fluorochromes that reflect the presence or absence of an intact membrane. IFC probes membrane integrity in a label-free approach by detecting membrane-induced hindrances to the propagation of electricity.ResultsA performance ring-test and comparison design on the FFC method showed that the method is robust against the exchange of equipment, procedures, materials, and operators. After initial method optimization with assessments of rehydration medium, wake-up duration, and phase shift gating on the individual strains, the IFC method showed good agreement with the FFC results. Specifically, we tested 6 distinct species of probiotic bacteria (3 Lactobacillus and 3 Bifidobacterium strains) finding good agreement between FFC and IFC results in terms of total and live cells.DiscussionTogether, these results demonstrate that flow cytometry is a reliable, precise, and user-friendly culture-independent method for bacterial enumeration.

Dataset Information

Can we trust untargeted metabolomics? Results of the metabo-ring initiative, a large-scale, multi-instrument inter-laboratory study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets