Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts.


ABSTRACT:

Background and aim

There is a lack of suitable in vitro models to evaluate various treatment modalities intending to remove subgingival bacterial biofilm. Consequently, the aims of this in vitro-study were: a) to establish a pocket model enabling mechanical removal of biofilm and b) to evaluate repeated non-surgical periodontal treatment with respect to biofilm removal and reformation, surface alterations, tooth hard-substance-loss, and attachment of periodontal ligament (PDL) fibroblasts.

Material and methods

Standardized human dentin specimens were colonized by multi-species biofilms for 3.5 days and subsequently placed into artificially created pockets. Non-surgical periodontal treatment was performed as follows: a) hand-instrumentation with curettes (CUR), b) ultrasonication (US), c) subgingival air-polishing using erythritol (EAP) and d) subgingival air-polishing using erythritol combined with chlorhexidine digluconate (EAP-CHX). The reduction and recolonization of bacterial counts, surface roughness (Ra and Rz), the caused tooth substance-loss (thickness) as well as the attachment of PDL fibroblasts were evaluated and statistically analyzed by means of ANOVA with Post-Hoc LSD.

Results

After 5 treatments, bacterial reduction in biofilms was highest when applying EAP-CHX (4 log10). The lowest reduction was found after CUR (2 log10). Additionally, substance-loss was the highest when using CUR (128±40 µm) in comparison with US (14±12 µm), EAP (6±7 µm) and EAP-CHX (11±10) µm). Surface was roughened when using CUR and US. Surfaces exposed to US and to EAP attracted the highest numbers of PDL fibroblasts.

Conclusion

The established biofilm model simulating a periodontal pocket combined with interchangeable placements of test specimens with multi-species biofilms enables the evaluation of different non-surgical treatment modalities on biofilm removal and surface alterations. Compared to hand instrumentation the application of ultrasonication and of air-polishing with erythritol prevents from substance-loss and results in a smooth surface with nearly no residual biofilm that promotes the reattachment of PDL fibroblasts.

SUBMITTER: Hagi TT 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4486723 | biostudies-literature | 2015

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts.

Hägi Tobias T TT   Klemensberger Sabrina S   Bereiter Riccarda R   Nietzsche Sandor S   Cosgarea Raluca R   Flury Simon S   Lussi Adrian A   Sculean Anton A   Eick Sigrun S  

PloS one 20150629 6


<h4>Background and aim</h4>There is a lack of suitable in vitro models to evaluate various treatment modalities intending to remove subgingival bacterial biofilm. Consequently, the aims of this in vitro-study were: a) to establish a pocket model enabling mechanical removal of biofilm and b) to evaluate repeated non-surgical periodontal treatment with respect to biofilm removal and reformation, surface alterations, tooth hard-substance-loss, and attachment of periodontal ligament (PDL) fibroblast  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10985801 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10492760 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4630604 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4663098 | biostudies-literature
2020-10-29 | GSE160358 | GEO
2016-02-19 | E-GEOD-78074 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2016-02-19 | GSE78074 | GEO
2011-03-17 | E-GEOD-27993 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2011-03-17 | GSE27993 | GEO
| S-EPMC3926144 | biostudies-literature