Dataset Information

CD4+ gain percentile curves for monitoring response to antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected adults.

ABSTRACT: We constructed CD4 cell count gain percentile distributions standardized by baseline CD4 cell count and assessed the association between poor CD4 cell count gain and subsequent death and virological failure on antiretroviral therapy (ART).Secondary analysis of 10 years of clinical data from a cohort of adults initiated on ART at the Themba Lethu clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa.The generalized additive model for location, scale and shape was used to construct percentile curves for CD4 cell count gain standardized by baseline CD4 cell count in the first 28 months of ART. Cox proportional models were used to assess the association between lower percentiles (<50th) of CD4 cell count gain, and subsequent death and virological failure.Among 9640 nonpregnant adults 7406, with available CD4 cell count results for CD4 gain calculation at 4 months of ART, 843 (8.7%) died subsequently and 1101 (11.4%) experienced virologic failure, respectively. For CD4 gains below the third percentile, the adjusted hazard ratios at different time points ranged between 2.72 and 5.73 for death, and between 1.48 and 6.93 for virologic failure. The CD4 percentile curves revealed a gradient of increasing risk of subsequent death and virological failure, with lower CD4 gain percentiles and increasing time on ART, and were more informative than the WHO criteria for immunological failure or current CD4 cell count.Percentile curves of CD4 cell count gain provide a simple tool for healthcare workers in low-resource settings to monitor response to ART with improved information regarding risk of death and virological failure compared to current WHO criteria for immunological failure.

SUBMITTER: Yotebieng M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4487417 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

CD4+ gain percentile curves for monitoring response to antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected adults.

Yotebieng Marcel M Maskew Mhairi M Van Rie Annelies A

AIDS (London, England) 20150601 9

<h4>Objectives</h4>We constructed CD4 cell count gain percentile distributions standardized by baseline CD4 cell count and assessed the association between poor CD4 cell count gain and subsequent death and virological failure on antiretroviral therapy (ART).<h4>Design</h4>Secondary analysis of 10 years of clinical data from a cohort of adults initiated on ART at the Themba Lethu clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa.<h4>Methods</h4>The generalized additive model for location, scale and shape was ...[more]

PMID: 26125140

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesImmune non-responders (INR) have poor CD4 recovery and are associated with increased risk of serious events despite antiretroviral therapy (ART). A clinically relevant definition for INR is lacking.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of three large cohorts: Infectious Disease Clinic at the Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the US Military HIV Natural History Study and Infectious Disease Program of the Grady Health System in Atlanta, Georgia. Two-stage modeling and joint model (JM) approaches were used to evaluate the association between CD4 (or CD4/CD8 ratio) slope within two years since ART initiation and a composite endpoint (AIDS, serious non-AIDS events and death) after two years of ART. We compared the predictive capacity of four CD4 count metrics (estimated CD4 slope, estimated CD4/CD8 ratio slope during two years following ART initiation and CD4 at 1 and 2 years following ART initiation) using Cox regression models.ResultsWe included 2,422 patients. Mean CD4 slope (±standard error) during two years of ART was 102 ± 2 cells/μl/year (95% confidence interval: 98-106 cells/μl/year), this increase was uniform among the three cohorts (p = 0.80). There were 267 composite events after two years on ART. Using the JM approach, a CD4 slope ≥100 cells/μL/year or CD4/CD8 ratio slope >0.1 higher rate per year were associated with lower composite endpoint rates (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80, p = 0.04 and HR = 0.75 p<0.01, respectively). All four CD4 metrics showed modest predictive capacity.ConclusionsUsing a complex JM approach, CD4 slope and CD4/CD8 ratio slope the first two years after ART initiation were associated with lower rates of the composite outcome. Moreover, the uniformity observed in the mean CD4 slope regardless of the cohort suggests a common CD4 response pattern independent of age or CD4 nadir. Given the consistency observed with CD4 slope, availability and ease of interpretation, this study provides strong rationale for using CD4 gains <100 cells/μl/year to identify patients at risk for adverse events.

Project description:BackgroundThere is conflicting evidence on the immunologic benefit of treating helminth co-infections ("deworming") in HIV-infected individuals. Several studies have documented reduced viral load and increased CD4 count in antiretroviral therapy (ART) naïve individuals after deworming. However, there are a lack of data on the effect of deworming therapy on CD4 count recovery among HIV-infected persons taking ART.Methodology/principal findingsTo estimate the association between empiric deworming therapy and CD4 count after ART initiation, we performed a retrospective observational study among HIV-infected adults on ART at a publicly operated HIV clinic in southwestern Uganda. Subjects were assigned as having received deworming if prescribed an anti-helminthic agent between 7 and 90 days before a CD4 test. To estimate the association between deworming and CD4 count, we fit multivariable regression models and analyzed predictors of CD4 count, using a time-by-interaction term with receipt or non-receipt of deworming. From 1998 to 2009, 5,379 subjects on ART attended 21,933 clinic visits at which a CD4 count was measured. Subjects received deworming prior to 668 (3%) visits. Overall, deworming was not associated with a significant difference in CD4 count in either the first year on ART (? = 42.8; 95% CI, -2.1 to 87.7) or after the first year of ART (? = ?-9.9; 95% CI, -24.1 to 4.4). However, in a sub-analysis by gender, during the first year of ART deworming was associated with a significantly greater rise in CD4 count (? = 63.0; 95% CI, 6.0 to 120.1) in females.Conclusions/significanceEmpiric deworming of HIV-infected individuals on ART conferred no significant generalized benefit on subsequent CD4 count recovery. A significant association was observed exclusively in females and during the initial year on ART. Our findings are consistent with recent studies that failed to demonstrate an immunologic advantage to empirically deworming ART-naïve individuals, but suggest that certain sub-populations may benefit.

Project description:BackgroundHIV eradication strategies are now being evaluated in vitro and in vivo. A cornerstone of such approaches is maximal suppression of viral replication with combination antiretroviral therapy (ART). Since many antiretroviral agents have off target effects, and different classes target different components of the viral life cycle, we questioned whether different classes of ART might differentially affect the survival and persistence of productively HIV-infected CD4 T cells.MethodsIn vitro infections of primary CD4 T cells using clinical isolates of HIV-1 that were either protease inhibitor susceptible (HIV PI-S), or resistant (HIV PI-R) were treated with nothing, lopinavir, efavirenz or raltegravir. Cell viability, apoptosis, and the proportion of surviving cells that were P24 positive was assessed by flow cytometry.ResultsIn HIV PI-S infected primary cultures, all three antiretroviral agents decreased viral replication, and reduced the total number of cells that were undergoing apoptosis (P?<?0.01) similarly. Similarly, in the HIV PI-R infected cultures, both efavirenz and raltegravir reduced viral replication and reduced apoptosis compared to untreated control (P?<?0.01), while lopinavir did not, suggesting that HIV replication drives T cell apoptosis, which was confirmed by association by linear regression (P?<?0.0001) . However since HIV protease has been suggested to directly induce apoptosis of infected CD4 T cells, and HIV PI are intrinsically antiapoptotic, we evaluated apoptosis in productively infected (HIV P24+) cells. More HIV p24 positive cells were apoptotic in the Efavirenz or raltegravir treated cultures than the lopinavir treated cultures (P?=?0.0008 for HIV PI-R and P?=?0.06 for the HIV PI-S), indicating that drug class impacts survival of productively infected CD4 T cells.ConclusionsInhibiting HIV replication with a PI, NNRTI or INSTI reduces total HIV-induced T cell apoptosis. However, blocking HIV replication with PI but not with NNRTI or INSTI promotes survival of productively HIV-infected cells. Thus, selection of antiretroviral agents may impact the success of HIV eradication strategies.

Project description:BackgroundHIV eradication strategies are now being evaluated in vitro and in vivo. A cornerstone of such approaches is maximal suppression of viral replication with combination antiretroviral therapy (ART). Since many antiretroviral agents have off target effects, and different classes target different components of the viral life cycle, we questioned whether different classes of ART might differentially affect the survival and persistence of productively HIV-infected CD4 T cells.MethodsIn vitro infections of primary CD4 T cells using clinical isolates of HIV-1 that were either protease inhibitor susceptible (HIV PI-S), or resistant (HIV PI-R) were treated with nothing, lopinavir, efavirenz or raltegravir. Cell viability, apoptosis, and the proportion of surviving cells that were P24 positive was assessed by flow cytometry.ResultsIn HIV PI-S infected primary cultures, all three antiretroviral agents decreased viral replication, and reduced the total number of cells that were undergoing apoptosis (P < 0.01) similarly. Similarly, in the HIV PI-R infected cultures, both efavirenz and raltegravir reduced viral replication and reduced apoptosis compared to untreated control (P < 0.01), while lopinavir did not, suggesting that HIV replication drives T cell apoptosis, which was confirmed by association by linear regression (P < 0.0001) . However since HIV protease has been suggested to directly induce apoptosis of infected CD4 T cells, and HIV PI are intrinsically antiapoptotic, we evaluated apoptosis in productively infected (HIV P24+) cells. More HIV p24 positive cells were apoptotic in the Efavirenz or raltegravir treated cultures than the lopinavir treated cultures (P = 0.0008 for HIV PI-R and P = 0.06 for the HIV PI-S), indicating that drug class impacts survival of productively infected CD4 T cells.ConclusionsInhibiting HIV replication with a PI, NNRTI or INSTI reduces total HIV-induced T cell apoptosis. However, blocking HIV replication with PI but not with NNRTI or INSTI promotes survival of productively HIV-infected cells. Thus, selection of antiretroviral agents may impact the success of HIV eradication strategies.

Dataset Information

CD4+ gain percentile curves for monitoring response to antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected adults.

Publications

CD4+ gain percentile curves for monitoring response to antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected adults.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets