Dataset Information

TFF2-CXCR4 Axis Is Associated with BRAF V600E Colon Cancer.

ABSTRACT: Oncogene-induced senescence (OIS), a tumor-suppressive mechanism that is induced by the replicative and metabolic stress of oncogene activation, is a key barrier in the development of BRAF V600E colon cancer. Inhibition of this mechanism has been observed through epigenetic changes observed in sporadic serrated polyps, as well as through the germline mutations associated with those who develop serrated polyposis. We hypothesize that upregulated autocrine factors exist that are specific to the serrated pathway and also promote bypass of oncogene-induced senescence. To identify such autocrine factors, we integrate analyses of microarrays of sessile serrated polyps and two large colon cancer cohorts, the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; n = 153), and French national Cartes d'Identité des Tumeurs (CIT) program (n = 462), with enhanced gene annotation through natural language processing techniques of the existing medical corpus. We reproducibly associate higher expression of the ligand-receptor axis of TFF2 and CXCR4 with BRAF V600E-mutant colon cancer (P = 3.0 × 10(-3) and 0.077, respectively for TCGA; P = 3.0 × 10(-8) and 5.1 × 10(-7) for CIT). Given well-described oncogenic roles of TFF2 and CXCR4 in colon cancer, and availability of CXCR4 inhibitors for other clinical indications, this ligand-receptor axis may represent an actionable target for prevention and treatment of this molecular subtype of colorectal cancer.

SUBMITTER: Gala MK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4490961 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

TFF2-CXCR4 Axis Is Associated with BRAF V600E Colon Cancer.

Gala Manish K MK Austin Thomas T Ogino Shuji S Chan Andrew T AT

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) 20150421 7

Oncogene-induced senescence (OIS), a tumor-suppressive mechanism that is induced by the replicative and metabolic stress of oncogene activation, is a key barrier in the development of BRAF V600E colon cancer. Inhibition of this mechanism has been observed through epigenetic changes observed in sporadic serrated polyps, as well as through the germline mutations associated with those who develop serrated polyposis. We hypothesize that upregulated autocrine factors exist that are specific to the se ...[more]

PMID: 25899003

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundBRAF V600E-mutant advanced colon cancer with peritoneal metastasis is associated with a poor prognosis. Surgery is not recommended by current guidelines, and there are few cases demonstrating the efficacy of targeted therapy combined with surgery in such patients. In the era of precision medicine, we apply aggressive surgery after successful conversion of triple-targeted drugs to prolong survival and provide a clinical basis for the treatment of such patients.Case descriptionA 72-year-old male patient presented with abdominal distension and changes in bowel habits was admitted to the Department of Oncology, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital. The patient was diagnosed with advanced ascending colon adenocarcinoma with peritoneal metastasis after relevant examinations such as abdominal enhanced computed tomography and tests of tumor markers. Later, further genetic testing was performed suggesting BRAF V600E mutation. We treated the patient with first-line three-target therapy (dabrafenib + trametinib + cetuximab). Repeat abdominal enhanced computed tomography after 6 weeks of three-target therapy revealed the disappearance of peritoneal metastases. Subsequently, after 3 months, the patient underwent resection of the primary lesion and removal of greater omental metastases. Three-target therapy continued after surgery until 4 months post-operation. However, carbohydrate antigen 199 was significantly increased at 9 months after medication discontinuation, and returned to normal after 4 months of re-initiation of three-target therapy. The three-target therapy was further adjusted to two-target therapy (dabrafenib + cetuximab) based on the results of circulating tumor cells, and the tumor markers are now normal.ConclusionsPatients with BRAF V600E colon cancer combined with peritoneal metastases are treated with targeted drug conversion therapy, and aggressive surgery may prolong survival depending on the conversion effect. Continued maintenance therapy after surgery may play a role in preventing recurrence.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Approximately one third of women who develop melanoma at childbearing age are diagnosed during gestation or the postpartum period, facing pregnancy-associated melanoma (PAM). However, only some retrospective studies with heterogeneous data have analyzed the impact of pregnancy on melanoma development, and no evidence exists about the behavior and the management of BRAF-mutated disease. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS:In order to better describe the evolution of BRAF V600E-mutated PAM, we present here all consecutive cases diagnosed in our site during the last 7?years, recording oncological, obstetrical, and perinatal parameters, as well as the therapeutic decisions for both melanoma and gestation. Based on our institutional experience, we weigh the current published evidence and discuss upcoming clinical considerations about the prognosis of PAM, the role of BRAF status, and the possible treatment options during pregnancy in localized or advanced/metastatic disease. Five women were diagnosed with newly metastatic or relapsed BRAF V600E-mutated PAM (four during gestation and one in the 1st year postpartum) between 2012 and 2019. All of them developed extensive metastatic disease with multiple organ involvement, and four developed brain metastases. All cases experienced melanoma progression in less than 6 months under targeted therapy and died soon independently of the followed sequence of treatments. All the neonates were delivered alive and healthy, but one developed melanoma earlier than the second year of life. RESULTS:Reviewing the literature to confirm our unfavorable outcomes, no specific data on BRAF-mutated PAM were retrieved and current evidence still supports that the prognosis of PAM should be guided by the established risk factors, whereas the management of advanced/metastatic PAM should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. CONCLUSION:More data are required to ascertain whether BRAF-mutated profile adversely affects PAM outcome, although the clinicians should be aware to detect any potential melanoma lesion during pregnancy as soon as possible, treating it locally, regardless of its BRAF status. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE:The prognosis and management of pregnancy-associated melanoma whether BRAF-mutated or wild type, is currently guided by the same parameters as in the nonpregnant condition. In this special nontrial subpopulation, BRAF-mutated status seems to have a detrimental effect on disease outcome, independently of the following treatments. In early stage melanoma, wide local excision with or without sentinel lymph node dissection may be curative at any trimester of gestation, while in advanced/metastatic setting, therapeutic strategy including immune-checkpoint or BRAF/MEK inhibitors, is more challenging, regardless of BRAF status, and should be based on an individualized decision in each case at a multidisciplinary level.

Project description:Recently BRAF V600E mutant-specific antibody (clone VE1) became available to immunohistochemically pinpoint the occurrence of these BRAF-mutant proteins in different tumors, such as colon carcinoma. Detection of BRAF mutations is important for the accurate application of targeted therapy against BRAF serine-threonine kinase activation. In this study, we evaluated 113 colon carcinomas including 95 primary and 27 metastatic tumors with the VE1 antibody using Leica Bond-Max automated immunohistochemistry. To ensure comprehensive BRAF V600E mutation detection, all cases were evaluated using 4 molecular methods (Sanger sequencing, the Cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test, BRAF V600 allele-specific polymerase chain reaction, and BRAF V600 quantitative polymerase chain reaction) with nearly 100% concordance. Molecular and immunohistochemical studies were blinded. Furthermore, all cases were evaluated for KRAS and NRAS mutations as parameters mutually exclusive with BRAF mutations offering parallel evidence for BRAF mutation status. Strong to moderate VE1 positivity was seen in 34 tumors. Twelve colon carcinomas showed weak VE1 immunohistochemical staining, and 67 were entirely negative. An identical c.1799T>A single nucleotide substitution leading to the BRAF V600E mutation was identified in 27 of 113 (24%) colon carcinomas. A majority of BRAF-mutant tumors were located in the right side of the colon and had mismatch-repair deficiency. V600E mutation-negative carcinomas were more often sigmoid tumors and usually showed intact mismatch-repair proteins and KRAS or NRAS mutations. The sensitivity and specificity of positive results (strong to moderate staining) of VE1 immunohistochemistry were 85% and 68%, respectively. If any positivity would be considered, then the specificity declined to 51% with no significant improvement of sensitivity. Therefore, only strong positivity should be considered when using the VE1 antibody and Leica Bond-Max automated immunohistochemistry with these parameters. Although VE1 antibody can be useful in the screening of colon carcinomas for BRAF V600E-mutant proteins, molecular genetic confirmation is always necessary for mutation diagnosis.

Dataset Information

TFF2-CXCR4 Axis Is Associated with BRAF V600E Colon Cancer.

Publications

TFF2-CXCR4 Axis Is Associated with BRAF V600E Colon Cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets