Dataset Information

Practice effects distort translational validity estimates for a Neurocognitive Battery.

ABSTRACT: With the globalization of biomedical research and the advent of "precision medicine," there is increased need for translation of neuropsychological tests, such as computerized batteries that can be incorporated in large-scale genomic studies. Estimates of translational validity are obtained by administering the test in the original and the translated versions to bilingual individuals. We investigated the translation of a neuropsychological battery from English to Arabic and how practice effects influence translational validity estimates.The Penn computerized neurocognitive battery (Penn CNB) includes tests that were validated with functional neuroimaging and provides measures of accuracy and speed of performance in several cognitive domains. To develop an Arabic version of the CNB, the English version was translated into Arabic, then back translated and revised. The Arabic and the original English versions were administered in a randomized crossover design to bilingual participants (N = 22).Performance varied by cognitive domain, but generally improved at the second session regardless of the language of the initial test. When performance on the English and Arabic version was compared, significant positive correlations were detected for accuracy in 8/13 cognitive domains and for speed in 4/13 domains (r = .02 to .97). When the practice estimates using linear models were incorporated, the translational validity estimates improved substantially (accuracy, r = .50-.96, speed, r = .63-.92, all correlations, p = .05 or better).While crossover designs control for order effects on average performance, practice effects, regardless of language, still need to be removed to obtain estimates of translational validity. When practice effect is controlled for, the Arabic and English versions of the Penn-CNB are well correlated, and the Arabic version is suitable for use in research.

SUBMITTER: Ibrahim I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4491030 | biostudies-literature | 2015

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Practice effects distort translational validity estimates for a Neurocognitive Battery.

Ibrahim Ibtihal I Tobar Salwa S Elassy Mai M Mansour Hader H Chen Kehui K Wood Joel J Gur Ruben C RC Gur Raquel E RE El Bahaei Wafaa W Nimgaonkar Vishwajit V

Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology 20150609 5

<h4>Introduction</h4>With the globalization of biomedical research and the advent of "precision medicine," there is increased need for translation of neuropsychological tests, such as computerized batteries that can be incorporated in large-scale genomic studies. Estimates of translational validity are obtained by administering the test in the original and the translated versions to bilingual individuals. We investigated the translation of a neuropsychological battery from English to Arabic and ...[more]

PMID: 26054545

Similar Datasets

Project description:Neurocognitive problems in CKD are well documented; time-efficient methods are needed to assess neurocognition in this population. We performed the first study of the efficient 1-hour Penn Computerized Neurocognitive Battery (CNB) in children and young adults with CKD.We administered the Penn CNB cross-sectionally to individuals aged 8-25 years with stage 2-5 CKD (n=92, enrolled from three academic nephrology practices from 2011 to 2014) and matched healthy controls (n=69). We analyzed results from 12 tests in four domains: executive control, episodic memory, complex cognition, and social cognition. All tests measure accuracy and speed; we converted raw scores to age-specific z-scores on the basis of Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (n=1790) norms. We analyzed each test in a linear regression with accuracy and speed z-scores as dependent variables and with (1) CKD versus control or (2) eGFR as explanatory variables, adjusted for race, sex, and maternal education.Patients with CKD (mean±SD eGFR, 48±25 ml/min per 1.73 m(2); mean age, 16.3±3.9 years) and controls (mean eGFR, 98±20 ml/min per 1.73 m(2); mean age, 16.0±4.0 years) were similar demographically. CKD participants had lower accuracy than controls in tests of complex cognition, with moderate to large effect sizes: -0.53 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], -0.87 to -0.19) for verbal reasoning, -0.52 (95% CI, -0.83 to -0.22) for nonverbal reasoning, and -0.64 (95% CI, -0.99 to -0.29) for spatial processing. For attention, patients with CKD had lower accuracy (effect size, -0.35 [95% CI, -0.67 to -0.03]) but faster response times (effect size, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.83]) than controls, perhaps reflecting greater impulsivity. Lower eGFR was associated with lower accuracy for complex cognition, facial and visual memory, and emotion identification tests.CKD is associated with lower accuracy in tests of complex cognition, attention, memory, and emotion identification, which related to eGFR. These findings are consistent with traditional neurocognitive testing in previous studies.

Dataset Information

Practice effects distort translational validity estimates for a Neurocognitive Battery.

Publications

Practice effects distort translational validity estimates for a Neurocognitive Battery.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets