Dataset Information

Identification and Antimicrobial Resistance of Bacteria Isolated from Probiotic Products Used in Shrimp Culture.

ABSTRACT: Probiotics are increasingly used in aquaculture to control diseases and improve feed digestion and pond water quality; however, little is known about the antimicrobial resistance properties of such probiotic bacteria and to what extent they may contribute to the development of bacterial resistance in aquaculture ponds. Concerns have been raised that the declared information on probiotic product labels are incorrect and information on bacterial composition are often missing. We therefore evaluated seven probiotics commonly used in Vietnamese shrimp culture for their bacterial species content, phenotypic antimicrobial resistance and associated transferable resistance genes. The bacterial species was established by 16S rRNA sequence analysis of 125 representative bacterial isolates. MIC testing was done for a range of antimicrobials and whole genome sequencing of six multiple antimicrobial resistant Bacillus spp. used to identify resistance genes and genetic elements associated with horizontal gene transfer. Thirteen bacterial species declared on the probiotic products could not be identified and 11 non-declared Bacillus spp. were identified. Although our culture-based isolation and identification may have missed a few bacterial species present in the tested products this would represent minor bias, but future studies may apply culture independent identification methods like pyro sequencing. Only 6/60 isolates were resistant to more than four antimicrobials and whole genome sequencing showed that they contained macrolide (ermD), tetracycline (tetL), phenicol (fexA) and trimethoprim (dfrD, dfrG and dfrK) resistance genes, but not known structures associated with horizontal gene transfer. Probiotic bacterial strains used in Vietnamese shrimp culture seem to contribute with very limited types and numbers of resistance genes compared to the naturally occurring bacterial species in aquaculture environments. Approval procedures of probiotic products must be strengthened through scientific-based efficacy trials and product labels should allow identification of individual bacterial strains and inform the farmer on specific purpose, dosage and correct application measures.

SUBMITTER: Noor Uddin GM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4492959 | biostudies-literature | 2015

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Identification and Antimicrobial Resistance of Bacteria Isolated from Probiotic Products Used in Shrimp Culture.

Noor Uddin Gazi Md GM Larsen Marianne Halberg MH Christensen Henrik H Aarestrup Frank M FM Phu Tran Minh TM Dalsgaard Anders A

PloS one 20150706 7

Probiotics are increasingly used in aquaculture to control diseases and improve feed digestion and pond water quality; however, little is known about the antimicrobial resistance properties of such probiotic bacteria and to what extent they may contribute to the development of bacterial resistance in aquaculture ponds. Concerns have been raised that the declared information on probiotic product labels are incorrect and information on bacterial composition are often missing. We therefore evaluate ...[more]

PMID: 26147573

Similar Datasets

Project description:The GRAS (generally recognized as safe) status of Enterococcus has not yet been authenticated, but enterococci, as probiotics, have been increasingly applied in human healthcare and animal husbandry, for instance as a dietary supplement, feed additive, or growth promotor. The food chain is the important route for introducing enterococci into the human gut. The pathogenicity of Enterococcus from probiotic products requires investigation. In the study, 110 commercial probiotic products used for human, animal, aquaculture, and plants were examined, among which 36 enterococci were identified, including 31 from Enterococcus faecium, 2 from E. faecalis, 2 from E. casseliflavus, and 1 from E. gallinarum. Strikingly, 28 of the 36 enterococci isolated from probiotics here did not mention the presence of Enterococcus in the labeled ingredients, and no Enterococcus isolates were found from 5 animal probiotics that were labeled with the genus. In total, 35 of the 110 products exhibited hemolysis, including 5 (10.6%) human probiotics, 14 (41.2%) animal probiotics, 8 (57.1%) aquaculture probiotics, and 8 (53.3%) plant probiotics. The detection rates of virulence factors associated with adhesion, antiphagocytosis, exoenzyme, biofilm, and other putative virulence markers (PVM) in 36 enterococci were 94.4%, 91.7%, 5.6%, 94.4% and 8.3%. Twenty-six of the 36 isolated strains exhibited biofilm formation ability, where 25 strains (69.4%) and one (2.8%) were strong and weak biofilm producers, respectively. We analyzed the resistance rates against erythromycin (97%), vancomycin and ciprofloxacin (8%), tetracycline (3%), and high-level aminoglycosides (0%), respectively. High detection rates of msrC/lsaA (86%) and aac(6')-Ii (86%) were observed, followed by vanC (8%), tetM (3%). The Tn5801-tetM-like integrative conjugative element (ICE) was identified in E. gallinarum, exhibiting resistance to tetracycline (64 μg/mL). Seven probiotic E. faecalis and E. faecium, as active ingredients in human probiotics, shared the same STs (sequence types) and were distinct from the STs of other contaminated or mislabeled enterococci, indicating that two particular STs belonged to native probiotic isolates. These findings advocate appropriate assessments of enterococci when used in probiotics.

Project description:Enterococcus faecium is one of the more commonly used bacterial species as a probiotic in animals. The organism, a common inhabitant of the gut of animals and humans, is a major nosocomial pathogen responsible for a variety infections in humans and sporadic infections in animals. In swine and cattle, E. faecium-based probiotic products are used for growth promotion and gut functional and health benefits. The objective of this study was to utilize whole genome sequence-based analysis to assess virulence potential, detect antimicrobial resistance genes, and analyze phylogenetic relationships of E. faecium strains from commercial swine and cattle probiotics. Genomic DNA extracted from E. faecium strains, isolated from commercial probiotic products of swine (n = 9) and cattle (n = 13), were sequenced in an Illumina MiSeq platform and analyzed. Seven of the nine swine strains and seven of the 13 cattle strains were identified as Enterococcus lactis, and not as E. faecium. None of the 22 probiotic strains carried major virulence genes required to initiate infections, but many carried genes involved in adhesion to host cells, which may benefit the probiotic strains to colonize and persist in the gut. Strains also carried genes encoding resistance to a few medically important antibiotics, which included aminoglycosides [aac(6')-Ii, aph(3')-III, ant(6)-Ia], macrolide, lincosamide and streptogramin B (msrC), tetracyclines [tet(L) and tet(M)], and phenicols [cat-(pc194)]. The comparison of the genotypic to phentypic AMR data showed presence of both related and unrelated genes in the probiotic strains. Swine and cattle probiotic E. faecium strains belonged to diverse sequence types. Phylogenetic analysis of the probiotic strains, and strains of human (n = 29), swine (n = 4), and cattle (n = 4) origin, downloaded from GenBank, indicated close clustering of strains belonging to the same species and source, but a few swine and cattle probiotic strains clustered closely with other cattle and human fecal strains. In conclusion, the absence of major virulence genes characteristic of the clinical E. faecium strains suggests that these probiotic strains are unlikely to initiate opportunistic infection. However, the carriage of AMR genes to medically important antibiotics and close clustering of the probiotic strains with other human and cattle fecal strains suggests that probiotic strains may pose risk to serve as a source of transmitting AMR genes to other gut bacteria.

Dataset Information

Identification and Antimicrobial Resistance of Bacteria Isolated from Probiotic Products Used in Shrimp Culture.

Publications

Identification and Antimicrobial Resistance of Bacteria Isolated from Probiotic Products Used in Shrimp Culture.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets