Dataset Information

Clinical Implications of a Dimensional Approach: The Normal:Abnormal Spectrum of Early Irritability.

ABSTRACT: The importance of dimensional approaches is widely recognized, but an empirical base for clinical application is lacking. This is particularly true for irritability, a dimensional phenotype that cuts across many areas of psychopathology and manifests early in life. We examine longitudinal, dimensional patterns of irritability and their clinical import in early childhood.Irritability was assessed longitudinally over an average of 16 months in a clinically enriched, diverse community sample of preschoolers (N = 497; mean = 4.2 years; SD = 0.8). Using the Temper Loss scale of the Multidimensional Assessment Profile of Disruptive Behavior (MAP-DB) as a developmentally sensitive indicator of early childhood irritability, we examined its convergent/divergent, clinical, and incremental predictive validity, and modeled its linear and nonlinear associations with clinical risk.The Temper Loss scale demonstrated convergent and divergent validity to child and maternal factors. In multivariate analyses, Temper Loss predicted mood (separation anxiety disorder [SAD], generalized anxiety disorder [GAD], and depression/dysthymia), disruptive (oppositional defiant disorder [ODD], attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [ADHD], and conduct disorder [CD]) symptoms. Preschoolers with even mildly elevated Temper Loss scale scores showed substantially increased risk of symptoms and disorders. For ODD, GAD, SAD, and depression, increases in Temper Loss scale scores at the higher end of the dimension had a greater impact on symptoms relative to increases at the lower end. Temper Loss scale scores also showed incremental validity over DSM-IV disorders in predicting subsequent impairment. Finally, accounting for the substantial heterogeneity in longitudinal patterns of Temper Loss significantly improved prediction of mood and disruptive symptoms.Dimensional, longitudinal characterization of irritability informs clinical prediction. A vital next step will be empirically generating parameters for the incorporation of dimensional information into clinical decision-making with reasonable certainty.

SUBMITTER: Wakschlag LS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4515952 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Clinical Implications of a Dimensional Approach: The Normal:Abnormal Spectrum of Early Irritability.

Wakschlag Lauren S LS Estabrook Ryne R Petitclerc Amelie A Henry David D Burns James L JL Perlman Susan B SB Voss Joel L JL Pine Daniel S DS Leibenluft Ellen E Briggs-Gowan Margaret L ML

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 20150614 8

<h4>Objective</h4>The importance of dimensional approaches is widely recognized, but an empirical base for clinical application is lacking. This is particularly true for irritability, a dimensional phenotype that cuts across many areas of psychopathology and manifests early in life. We examine longitudinal, dimensional patterns of irritability and their clinical import in early childhood.<h4>Method</h4>Irritability was assessed longitudinally over an average of 16 months in a clinically enriched ...[more]

PMID: 26210331

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesCharacterize the dimensional spectrum of preadolescent (PA) irritability, a robust transdiagnostic vulnerability marker, using the youth version of the Multidimensional Assessment Profiles Temper Loss (MAPS-TL-Youth) scale including common and with developmentally specific items. Based on this, derive and validate a clinically optimized irritability screener to flag psychopathology risk in preadolescents.MethodsThe normal:abnormal irritability spectrum was modeled using MAPS-TL-Youth data from the Multidimensional Assessment of Preschoolers Study (MAPS) Study PA wave (n = 340) via item response theory. Both cross-cutting core items from the MAPS scales and developmentally specific items were used to generate this dimension. Stepwise logistic regression was then used to optimize MAPS-TL-Youth irritability items in relation to Kiddie Schedule of Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia impairment to generate a clinically optimized irritability screener. Receiver operator characteristic analysis identified the irritability threshold for the screener. For the first time, youth self-report of their own irritability on the MAPS-TL was also modeled via the MAPS-TL-Youth-Self-Report (MAPS-TL-Youth-SR).ResultsIrritability was unidimensional and ranged from mild and common to severe and rare behaviors. Developmentally specific items allowed detection of more severe irritability. Items for the screener were identified in relation to concurrent impairment. These included low frustration tolerance and pathognomonic severe behaviors. The clinically optimized screener demonstrated very good sensitively (87%) and specificity (81%) in regard to concurrent irritability-related DSM disorders. Modeling of the MAPS-TL-Youth-SR yielded similar results.ConclusionCharacterizing the normal: abnormal spectrum of irritability in preadolescence advances application of Research Domain Criteria methods to this developmental period. This foundational work yielded two developmentally specified tools for irritability characterization in preadolescence: a nuanced dimensional scale to precisely characterize the full normal-abnormal irritability spectrum, and a pragmatic, clinically optimized screener suitable for real world use. Future application in mechanistic and clinical studies will be important for establishing validity and incremental utility.

Project description:ImportancePatients with abnormal (positive) exercise electrocardiography, but normal stress echocardiography (+ECG/-Echo) are commonly encountered in clinical practice; however, the prognostic significance of this discordant result is unclear.ObjectiveTo determine whether patients with +ECG/-Echo have a higher rate of adverse clinical events and a poorer prognosis than patients with negative exercise ECG and normal stress Echo imaging (-ECG/-Echo).Design, setting, and participantsBetween January 1, 2000, and February 28, 2014, a total of 47 944 consecutive patients without known coronary artery disease who underwent exercise stress Echo at Duke University Medical Center were evaluated for inclusion in this observational cohort study. Data analysis was conducted from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2016.Interventions/exposuresPatients were categorized as having -ECG/-Echo, +ECG/-Echo, or +Echo (-ECG/+Echo and +ECG/+Echo).Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was a composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, and coronary revascularization. Secondary outcomes included individual adverse events and downstream testing.ResultsAfter excluding submaximal tests and nondiagnostic ECG or stress imaging results, 15 077 patients (mean [SD] age, 52 [13] years; 6228 [41.3%] men) were classified by stress test results. Of these, 12 893 patients (85.5%) had -ECG/-Echo, 1286 patients (8.5%) had +ECG/-Echo, and 898 patients (6.0%) had +Echo. Through a median follow-up of 7.3 (interquartile range, 4.4-10.0) years, the composite end point occurred in 794 patients with -ECG/-Echo (8.5%), 142 patients with +ECG/-Echo (14.6%), and 297 patients with +Echo (37.4%). Death occurred in 425 patients with -ECG/-Echo (4.8%), 50 patients with +ECG/-Echo (5.9%), and 70 patients with +Echo (11.2%). Myocardial infarction occurred in 195 patients with -ECG/-Echo (2.2%), 31 patients with +ECG/-Echo (3.6%), and 59 patients with +Echo (8.7%). The addition of stress ECG findings to clinical and exercise data yielded incremental prognostic value. Patients with -ECG/-Echo imaging results had the least downstream testing (2.3%), followed by +ECG/-Echo (12.8%), and +Echo (33.6%) (P < .001).Conclusions and relevanceThe presence of +ECG results with normal stress Echo imaging may identify a population of patients who are at slightly increased risk for adverse cardiac events, which was not previously recognized. Further study is needed to determine whether these patients will benefit from intensification of medical management.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:Advances in developmentally sensitive measurement have enabled differentiation of normative versus clinically salient irritability in early childhood. However, clinical application of these measures is still nascent. The authors developed an optimized model of clinically salient irritable behaviors at preschool age. Based on this model, the authors derived an empirically based cutoff in relation to concurrent DSM-5 irritability-related disorders (i.e., oppositional defiant disorder, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, other depressive disorders) and used longitudinal models to test the predictive validity of the cutoff for impairment and irritability trajectories and later DSM disorders. METHOD:Preschool children oversampled for irritability were followed over 3 time points into early school age (N = 425; mean age at baseline 4.7 years, mean follow-up 2.9 years). Mothers reported on children's irritability using the developmentally validated Multidimensional Assessment of Profile of Disruptive Behavior (MAP-DB) Temper Loss scale, impairment using the Family Life Impairment Scale, and DSM categories using the Preschool Age Psychiatric Assessment and the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime Version. RESULTS:Of 22 MAP-DB Temper Loss behaviors, 2 behaviors-1 normative (easily frustrated) and 1 rare dysregulated (destructive tantrums)-were uniquely related to cross-domain impairment. At baseline, these 2 irritability items identified diagnostic status (oppositional defiant disorder, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, other depressive disorders) with good sensitivity (70-73%) and specificity (74-83%). Children above the irritability cutoff at baseline also exhibited more persistent irritability and impairment and greater likelihood of DSM disorders in early school age. CONCLUSION:Clinical identification of early-onset irritability can be enhanced using brief, developmentally optimized indicators. Further research to apply these findings to tiered early intervention is important.

Dataset Information

Clinical Implications of a Dimensional Approach: The Normal:Abnormal Spectrum of Early Irritability.

Publications

Clinical Implications of a Dimensional Approach: The Normal:Abnormal Spectrum of Early Irritability.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets