Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

20 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Using published data in Mendelian randomization: a blueprint for efficient identification of causal risk factors.

ABSTRACT: Finding individual-level data for adequately-powered Mendelian randomization analyses may be problematic. As publicly-available summarized data on genetic associations with disease outcomes from large consortia are becoming more abundant, use of published data is an attractive analysis strategy for obtaining precise estimates of the causal effects of risk factors on outcomes. We detail the necessary steps for conducting Mendelian randomization investigations using published data, and present novel statistical methods for combining data on the associations of multiple (correlated or uncorrelated) genetic variants with the risk factor and outcome into a single causal effect estimate. A two-sample analysis strategy may be employed, in which evidence on the gene-risk factor and gene-outcome associations are taken from different data sources. These approaches allow the efficient identification of risk factors that are suitable targets for clinical intervention from published data, although the ability to assess the assumptions necessary for causal inference is diminished. Methods and guidance are illustrated using the example of the causal effect of serum calcium levels on fasting glucose concentrations. The estimated causal effect of a 1 standard deviation (0.13 mmol/L) increase in calcium levels on fasting glucose (mM) using a single lead variant from the CASR gene region is 0.044 (95 % credible interval -0.002, 0.100). In contrast, using our method to account for the correlation between variants, the corresponding estimate using 17 genetic variants is 0.022 (95 % credible interval 0.009, 0.035), a more clearly positive causal effect.

SUBMITTER: Burgess S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4516908 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Causal factors for osteoarthritis risk revealed by mendelian randomization analysis.

Project description:Osteoarthritis (OA), a prevalent chronic disease among the elderly, presents a complex pathogenesis and currently lacks effective treatment. Traditional observational studies are time-consuming, labor-intensive, susceptible to confounding factors, and cannot establish causal relationships. Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, leveraging genetic variation to assess causal associations between exposures and outcomes, offers a cost-effective and efficient alternative. Over the past decade, large-scale genome-wide association studies have identified numerous genetic variants linked to OA risk factors, facilitating MR study design. In this review, we systematically identified 52 MR studies meeting specific criteria and evaluated their quality, exploring the impact of lifestyle, nutrition, comorbidities, circulating metabolites, plasma proteins, and other health factors on OA risk. We discuss the results and potential mechanisms of MR findings, addressing conflicting evidence based on existing literature and our prior research. With the ongoing expansion of genome-wide association data, we anticipate MR's role in future OA studies to broaden, particularly in drug development research using targeted MR approaches. We thus aim for this paper to offer valuable insights for researchers and clinicians in related fields.

| S-EPMC11341639 | biostudies-literature

Causal Associations of Urate With Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization.

Project description:BackgroundMendelian Randomization (MR) studies show conflicting causal associations of genetically predicted serum urate with cardiovascular risk factors (i.e., hypertension, diabetes, lipid profile, and kidney function). This study aimed to robustly investigate a causal relationship between urate and cardiovascular risk factors considering single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as instrumental variables using two-sample MR and various sensitivity analyses.MethodsData on SNP-urate associations were taken from the Global Urate Genetics Consortium and data on SNP-cardiovascular risk factor associations were taken from various consortia/UK Biobank. SNPs were selected by statistically and biologically driven approaches as instrumental variables. Various sensitivity analyses were performed using different MR methods including inverse variance weighted, MR-Egger, weighted median/mode, MR-PRESSO, and the contamination mixture method.ResultsThe statistically driven approach showed significant causal effects of urate on HDL-C and triglycerides using four of the six MR methods, i.e., every 1 mg/dl increase in genetically predicted urate was associated with 0.047 to 0.103 SD decrease in HDL-C and 0.034 to 0.207 SD increase in triglycerides. The biologically driven approach to selection of SNPs from ABCG2, SLC2A9, SLC17A1, SLC22A11, and SLC22A12 showed consistent causal effects of urate on HDL-C from all methods with 0.038 to 0.057 SD decrease in HDL-C per 1 mg/dl increase of urate, and no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy was detected.ConclusionOur study suggests a significant and robust causal effect of genetically predicted urate on HDL-C. This finding may explain a small proportion (7%) of the association between increased urate and cardiovascular disease but points to urate being a novel cardiac risk factor.

| S-EPMC8297413 | biostudies-literature

Selecting likely causal risk factors from high-throughput experiments using multivariable Mendelian randomization.

Project description:Modern high-throughput experiments provide a rich resource to investigate causal determinants of disease risk. Mendelian randomization (MR) is the use of genetic variants as instrumental variables to infer the causal effect of a specific risk factor on an outcome. Multivariable MR is an extension of the standard MR framework to consider multiple potential risk factors in a single model. However, current implementations of multivariable MR use standard linear regression and hence perform poorly with many risk factors. Here, we propose a two-sample multivariable MR approach based on Bayesian model averaging (MR-BMA) that scales to high-throughput experiments. In a realistic simulation study, we show that MR-BMA can detect true causal risk factors even when the candidate risk factors are highly correlated. We illustrate MR-BMA by analysing publicly-available summarized data on metabolites to prioritise likely causal biomarkers for age-related macular degeneration.

| S-EPMC6946691 | biostudies-literature

Causal effects of modifiable risk factors on kidney stones: a bidirectional mendelian randomization study.

Project description:BackgroundIncreasing epidemiological studies demonstrated that modifiable risk factors affected the risk of kidney stones. We aimed to systemically assess these causal associations using a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.MethodsWe obtained instrumental variables related to each exposure at the genome-wide significant threshold (P < 5 × 10-8). Summary level data for outcomes from the FinnGen consortium and UK Biobank were utilized in the discovery and replication stage. The Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was used as the primary analysis, with additional sensitivity analyses and fix-effect meta-analysis to verify the robustness of IVW results.ResultsAmong 46 risk factors, five were significantly associated with nephrolithiasis risk in the FinnGen consortium, UK Biobank, and meta-analyses collectively. The odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals [95%CIs]) of kidney stones were 1.21 (1.13, 1.29) per standard deviation (SD) increase in serum calcium, 1.55 (1.01, 2.36) per SD increase in serum 25(OH)D, 1.14 (1.00, 1.29) per SD increase in total triglycerides, 2.38 (1.34, 4.22) per SD increase in fasting insulin, and 0.28 (0.23, 0.35) per unit increase in log OR of urine pH. In addition, genetically predicted serum phosphorus, urinary sodium, tea consumption, and income affected the risk of kidney stones (false discovery rate [FDR] P < 0.05) based on the outcome data from the FinnGen consortium, and the significant associations of education and waist-to-hip ratio with nephrolithiasis risks were found after FDR correction (FDR P < 0.05) based on the outcome data from UK Biobank.ConclusionsOur findings comprehensively provide modifiable risk factors for the prevention of nephrolithiasis. Genome-wide association studies with larger sample sizes are needed to verify these causal associations in the future further.

| S-EPMC10116718 | biostudies-literature

Detecting potential causal relationship between multiple risk factors and Alzheimer's disease using multivariable Mendelian randomization.

Project description:BackgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive brain disorder characterized by cognitive skills deterioration that affects many elderly individuals. The identified genetic loci for AD failed to explain the large variability in AD and very few causal factors have been identified so far.ResultsmvMR showed that increasing years of schooling (OR=0.674, 95%CI: 0.571-0.796, P=3.337E-06) and genetically elevated HDL cholesterol (OR ranging from 0.697 to 0.830, P=6.940E-10) were inversely associated with AD risk, genetically predicted total cholesterol (OR=1.300, 1.196 to 1.412; P=6.223E-10) and LDL cholesterol (OR=1.193, 1.097 to 1.296, P=3.564E-05) were associated with increasing AD risk. Genetically predicted FG was suggestively associated with increased AD risk. Furthermore, MR-BMA analysis also confirmed FG and years of schooling as two of the top five causal risk factors for AD.ConclusionsOur findings might provide us novel insights for treatment and intervention into the causal risk factors for AD or AD-related complex diseases.MethodsBy using extension methods of Mendelian randomization (MR)--multivariable MR (mvMR) and MR based on Bayesian model averaging (MR-BMA), we intend to estimate the potential causal relationship between nine risk factors and AD outcome and try to prioritize the most causal risk factors for AD.

| S-EPMC7695397 | biostudies-literature

Causal influence of immune factors on the risk of diabetic retinopathy: a mendelian randomization study.

Project description:ObjectivesDiabetic retinopathy (DR) is a prevalent microvascular complication in diabetic patients. Various mechanisms have been implicated in the pathogenesis of DR. Previous studies have observed the relationship between immune factors and DR, but the causal relationship has not been determined.MethodsWe conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis of 731 immune cells and DR, using publicly available genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics, to evaluate potential causal relationships between them. Four types of immune traits were included in the analysis through flow cytometry. GWAS statistics for DR were obtained from the Finngen database, which performed GWAS on 190,594 European individuals (Ncase = 14,584, Ncontrol = 176,010) to assess genetically predicted DR. The primary method used to perform causality analysis was inverse variance weighting (IVW).ResultsFollowing false discovery rate (FDR) correction, 11MFI-DR, 5AC-DR, 5RC-DR, and 1MP-DR reached a significant causal association level (PFDR < 0.05). Notably, all AC traits exhibited potential associations with a decreased risk of DR(OR < 1), while a majority of MFI traits, along with the singular MP trait, exhibited potential associations with an increased risk of DR (OR > 1). The highest proportion of T-cell subsets in the final results.ConclusionThis study elucidates that the progression of DR is intricately influenced by immune responses, thereby confirming the immunological susceptibility of DR. Our findings may offer new targets for diagnosing and treating DR, as well as aid in developing therapeutic strategies from an immunological standpoint.

| S-EPMC11318264 | biostudies-literature

Mendelian randomization analysis revealed potential metabolic causal factors for breast cancer.

Project description:Observational studies showed that metabolic phenotypes were associated with the risk of developing breast cancer (BC). However, those results are inconsistent regarding the magnitude of the association, particularly by subtypes of breast cancer. Furthermore, the mechanisms of the association remain unclear. We performed two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to evaluate the causal effect of metabolic risk factors on breast cancer in the European population. Assessed individually using MR, body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] 0.94, 95% Confidence interval [CI] 0.90-0.98, P = 0.007), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.07-1.13, P = 6.10 × 10-11) and triglycerides (TG) (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.90-0.96, P = 1.58 × 10-6) were causally related to breast cancer risk. In multivariable MR, only HDL-C (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.02-1.14; P = 0.02) retained a robust effect, suggesting that the genetic association between BMI, HDL-C and TG with breast cancer risk in univariable analysis was explained via HDL-C. These findings suggest a possible causal role of HDL-C in breast cancer etiology.

| S-EPMC10471756 | biostudies-literature

Cross-fitted instrument: A blueprint for one-sample Mendelian randomization.

Project description:Bias from weak instruments may undermine the ability to estimate causal effects in instrumental variable regression (IVR). We present here a new approach to handling weak instrument bias through the application of a new type of instrumental variable coined 'Cross-Fitted Instrument' (CFI). CFI splits the data at random and estimates the impact of the instrument on the exposure in each partition. These estimates are then used to perform an IVR on each partition. We adapt CFI to the Mendelian randomization (MR) setting and term this adaptation 'Cross-Fitting for Mendelian Randomization' (CFMR). We show that, even when using weak instruments, CFMR is, at worst, biased towards the null, which makes it a conservative one-sample MR approach. In particular, CFMR remains conservative even when the two samples used to perform the MR analysis completely overlap, whereas current state-of-the-art approaches (e.g., MR RAPS) display substantial bias in this setting. Another major advantage of CFMR lies in its use of all of the available data to select genetic instruments, which maximizes statistical power, as opposed to traditional two-sample MR where only part of the data is used to select the instrument. Consequently, CFMR is able to enhance statistical power in consortia-led meta-analyses by enabling a conservative one-sample MR to be performed in each cohort prior to a meta-analysis of the results across all the cohorts. In addition, CFMR enables a cross-ethnic MR analysis by accounting for ethnic heterogeneity, which is particularly important in meta-analyses where the participating cohorts may have different ethnicities. To our knowledge, none of the current MR approaches can account for such heterogeneity. Finally, CFMR enables the application of MR to exposures that are either rare or difficult to measure, which would normally preclude their analysis in the regular two-sample MR setting.

| S-EPMC9462731 | biostudies-literature

In-depth Mendelian randomization analysis of causal factors for coronary artery disease.

Project description:Selecting a set of valid genetic variants is critical for Mendelian randomization (MR) to correctly infer risk factors causing a disease. We here developed a method for selecting genetic variants as valid instrumental variables for inferring risk factors causing coronary artery disease (CAD). Using this method, we selected two sets of single-nucleotide-polymorphism (SNP) genetic variants (SNP338 and SNP363) associated with each of the three potential risk factors for CAD including low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) and triglycerides (TG) from two independent GWAS datasets. We performed in-depth multivariate MR (MVMR) analyses and the results from both datasets consistently showed that LDL-c was strongly associated with increased risk for CAD (? = 0.396,OR = 1.486 per 1?SD (equivalent to 38?mg/dL), 95CI = (1.38, 1.59) in SNP338; and ? = 0.424, OR = 1.528 per 1?SD, 95%CI = (1.42, 1.65) in SNP363); HDL-c was strongly associated with reduced risk for CAD (? = -0.315, OR = 0.729 per 1?SD (equivalent to 16?mg/dL), 95CI = (0.68, 0.78) in SNP338; and ? = -0.319, OR = 0.726 per 1?SD, 95%CI = (0.66, 0.80), in SNP363). In case of TG, when using the full datasets, an increased risk for CAD (? = 0.184, OR = 1.2 per 1?SD (equivalent to 89?mg/dL), 95%CI = (1.12, 1.28) in SNPP338; and ? = 0.207, OR = 1.222 per 1?SD, 95%CI = (1.10, 1.36) in SNP363) was observed, while using partial datasets that contain shared and unique SNPs showed that TG is not a risk factor for CAD. From these results, it can be inferred that TG itself is not a causal risk factor for CAD, but it's shown as a risk factor due to pleiotropic effects associated with LDL-c and HDL-c SNPs. Large-scale simulation experiments without pleiotropic effects also corroborated these results.

| S-EPMC7280530 | biostudies-literature

Mendelian randomization analysis using mixture models for robust and efficient estimation of causal effects.

Project description:Mendelian randomization (MR) has emerged as a major tool for the investigation of causal relationship among traits, utilizing results from large-scale genome-wide association studies. Bias due to horizontal pleiotropy, however, remains a major concern. We propose a novel approach for robust and efficient MR analysis using large number of genetic instruments, based on a novel spike-detection algorithm under a normal-mixture model for underlying effect-size distributions. Simulations show that the new method, MRMix, provides nearly unbiased or/and less biased estimates of causal effects compared to alternative methods and can achieve higher efficiency than comparably robust estimators. Application of MRMix to publicly available datasets leads to notable observations, including identification of causal effects of BMI and age-at-menarche on the risk of breast cancer; no causal effect of HDL and triglycerides on the risk of coronary artery disease; a strong detrimental effect of BMI on the risk of major depressive disorder.

| S-EPMC6486646 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data