Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
To determine whether a Bayley-III motor composite score of 85 may overestimate moderate-severe motor impairment by analyzing Bayley-III motor components and developing cut-point scores for each.Study design
Retrospective study of 1183 children born <27 weeks gestation at NICHD Neonatal Research Network centers and evaluated at 18-22 months corrected age. Gross Motor Function Classification System determined gross motor impairment. Statistical analyses included linear and logistic regression and sensitivity/specificity.Results
Bayley-III motor composite scores were strong indicators of gross/fine motor impairment. A motor composite cut-point of 73 markedly improved the specificity for identifying gross and/or fine motor impairment (94% compared with a specificity of 76% for the proposed new cut-point of 85). A Fine Motor Scaled Score <3 differentiated mild from moderate-severe fine motor impairment.Conclusions
This study indicates that a Bayley-III motor composite score of 85 may overestimate impairment. Further studies are needed employing term controls and longer follow-up.
SUBMITTER: Duncan AF
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4531094 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Duncan A F AF Bann C C Boatman C C Hintz S R SR Vaucher Y E YE Vohr B R BR Yolton K K Heyne R J RJ
Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association 20150129 7
<h4>Objective</h4>To determine whether a Bayley-III motor composite score of 85 may overestimate moderate-severe motor impairment by analyzing Bayley-III motor components and developing cut-point scores for each.<h4>Study design</h4>Retrospective study of 1183 children born <27 weeks gestation at NICHD Neonatal Research Network centers and evaluated at 18-22 months corrected age. Gross Motor Function Classification System determined gross motor impairment. Statistical analyses included linear an ...[more]