Dataset Information

Both PON1 Q192R and CYP2C19*2 influence platelet response to clopidogrel and ischemic events in Chinese patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

ABSTRACT: Clopidogrel nonresponsiveness increases the recurrence of cardiovascular events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Previous studies found that genetic variants such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of CYP2C19 and PON1 may influence clopidogrel response, cause high platelet reactivity (HPR) and increase cardiovascular events. However, these studies were inconsistent and inconclusive, especially in the Eastern Asian population. In this study, we investigated the effects of genetic variants on clopidogrel response and clinical outcomes in Chinese patients undergoing PCI. A total of 336 acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing PCI were included, 53 (15.77%) of whom were categorized as HPR. Among the 10 SNPs studied (ABCB1, CYP2C19*2, CYP2C19*3, CYP2C19*4, CYP2C19*17, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, ITGB3, P2Y12 and PON1 Q192R), the CYP2C19*4 and P2Y12 variants were not found in our population. The PON1 192Q and CYP2C19*2 alleles were significantly higher in the HPR group compared with the normal platelet reactivity (NPR) group (P=0.033 and 0.038, respectively), while the other SNPs were not significantly different between the two groups. Platelet aggregation of the PON1 192Q allele carriers was significantly higher than that of non-carriers both at baseline and 1 month after PCI (P=0.010 and 0.024, respectively); this was the case for CYP2C19*2 allele carriers, as well (P=0.005 and 0.003, respectively). The risk of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) increased with the presence of the PON1 192Q and CYP2C19*2 alleles during 6-month follow-up (P=0.012 and 0.003, respectively). In conclusion, both the PON1 Q192R and CYP2C19*2 variants are associated with HPR and an increased risk of ischemic events in Chinese patients undergoing PCI.

SUBMITTER: Chen Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4538118 | biostudies-literature | 2015

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Both PON1 Q192R and CYP2C19*2 influence platelet response to clopidogrel and ischemic events in Chinese patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Chen Yu Y Huang Xiaohong X Tang Yong Y Xie Yuquan Y Zhang Yachen Y

International journal of clinical and experimental medicine 20150615 6

Clopidogrel nonresponsiveness increases the recurrence of cardiovascular events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Previous studies found that genetic variants such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of CYP2C19 and PON1 may influence clopidogrel response, cause high platelet reactivity (HPR) and increase cardiovascular events. However, these studies were inconsistent and inconclusive, especially in the Eastern Asian population. In this study, we investigated ...[more]

PMID: 26309584

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceCurrent guidelines recommend ticagrelor as the preferred P2Y12 platelet inhibitor for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), primarily based on a single large randomized clinical trial. The benefits and risks associated with ticagrelor vs clopidogrel in routine practice merits attention.ObjectiveTo determine the association of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel with ischemic and hemorrhagic events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ACS in clinical practice.Design, setting, and participantsA retrospective cohort study of patients with ACS who underwent PCI and received ticagrelor or clopidogrel was conducted using 2 United States electronic health record-based databases and 1 nationwide South Korean database from November 2011 to March 2019. Patients were matched using a large-scale propensity score algorithm, and the date of final follow-up was March 2019.ExposuresTicagrelor vs clopidogrel.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end point was net adverse clinical events (NACE) at 12 months, composed of ischemic events (recurrent myocardial infarction, revascularization, or ischemic stroke) and hemorrhagic events (hemorrhagic stroke or gastrointestinal bleeding). Secondary outcomes included NACE or mortality, all-cause mortality, ischemic events, hemorrhagic events, individual components of the primary outcome, and dyspnea at 12 months. The database-level hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled to calculate summary HRs by random-effects meta-analysis.ResultsAfter propensity score matching among 31 290 propensity-matched pairs (median age group, 60-64 years; 29.3% women), 95.5% of patients took aspirin together with ticagrelor or clopidogrel. The 1-year risk of NACE was not significantly different between ticagrelor and clopidogrel (15.1% [3484/23 116 person-years] vs 14.6% [3290/22 587 person-years]; summary HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.00-1.10]; P = .06). There was also no significant difference in the risk of all-cause mortality (2.0% for ticagrelor vs 2.1% for clopidogrel; summary HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.81-1.16]; P = .74) or ischemic events (13.5% for ticagrelor vs 13.4% for clopidogrel; summary HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.98-1.08]; P = .32). The risks of hemorrhagic events (2.1% for ticagrelor vs 1.6% for clopidogrel; summary HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.13-1.61]; P = .001) and dyspnea (27.3% for ticagrelor vs 22.6% for clopidogrel; summary HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.17-1.26]; P < .001) were significantly higher in the ticagrelor group.Conclusions and relevanceAmong patients with ACS who underwent PCI in routine clinical practice, ticagrelor, compared with clopidogrel, was not associated with significant difference in the risk of NACE at 12 months. Because the possibility of unmeasured confounders cannot be excluded, further research is needed to determine whether ticagrelor is more effective than clopidogrel in this setting.

Project description:ImportanceGuidelines currently recommend ticagrelor over clopidogrel for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) based on randomized clinical trial data in which ticagrelor reduced major adverse coronary events (MACE) vs clopidogrel but increased bleeding and dyspnea.ObjectiveTo compare the risk of MACE with ticagrelor vs clopidogrel in patients with ACS treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), to compare major bleeding and dyspnea, and to evaluate the association between P2Y12 inhibitor adherence and MACE.Design, setting, and participantsPopulation-based cohort study using data of patients discharged alive after PCI for ACS from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease registry from April 1, 2012, to March 31, 2016, with follow-up to 1 year. Analysis began April 2018.ExposuresOutpatient prescription for ticagrelor or clopidogrel within 31 days after PCI. Adherence was defined as a medication refill adherence value of 80% or higher.Main outcomes and measuresMajor adverse coronary events, a composite of all-cause death, hospitalization for ACS, unplanned coronary revascularization, or stent thrombosis within 365 days after index PCI. Secondary outcomes included hospitalization for major bleeding and emergency department visit for dyspnea.ResultsOf 11 185 individuals who underwent PCI, the median (interquartile range) age was 61 (54-71) years, and 2760 (24.7%) were women. Ticagrelor users (4076 [36.4%]) were generally younger and had fewer cardiac and noncardiac comorbidities than clopidogrel users. Ticagrelor was not associated with lower risk of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.85-1.10); however, it was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (aHR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.29-1.78) and dyspnea (aHR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.47-2.65). A total of 3328 ticagrelor users (81.6%) were adherent during the study vs 5256 of clopidogrel users (73.9%) (P < .001; χ2 = 86.4). In the full cohort, adherence was associated with a lower MACE risk (aHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.90 for adherence of ≥80% vs <80%). Differences in other secondary outcomes were not statistically significant. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were consistent with primary analyses.Conclusions and relevanceIn this population-based cohort study of patients with ACS who underwent PCI, outpatient use of ticagrelor was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in MACE vs clopidogrel; however, it was associated with more major bleeding and dyspnea.

Project description:ObjectivesThis study sought to evaluate the influence of the genetic polymorphisms on platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients taking clopidogrel.BackgroundLittle research has been published on relationships between genetic polymorphisms, platelet reactivity, and clinical outcomes in stroke patients treated with clopidogrel.MethodsPatients hospitalized in Changhai Hospital with acute ischemic stroke were randomly enrolled into treatment with a 75-mg daily maintenance dose of clopidogrel. Genotyping was detected by the MassARRAY iPLEX genotyping system (Sequenom Inc, San Diego, CA), and platelet reactivity was evaluated by the VerifyNow P2Y12 test (Accumetrics Inc., San Diego, CA). Sixteen single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within 9 genes were selected and high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined as P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) value ≥230. The primary endpoint was ischemic events, including major adverse cardiac events (MACE), recurrence of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and the composite of vascular death, and the secondary endpoint was bleeding.ResultsOf the 345 patients recruited, 275 (79.7%) patients were followed up for 1 year and 122 (35.4%) patients were categorized as HPR. Among the SNPs selected, only the CYP2C19*2 allele and the CYP2C19*3 allele were statistically significantly associated with PRU (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). Similarly, the prevalence of HPR was associated with CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3 (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). During the 1 year of follow-up, a total of 64 (23.3%) cases of clinical events occurred, including 60 ischemic events and 4 bleeding events. There were no correlation between CYP2C19 variant alleles and clinical outcomes (P > 0.05), but a statistically significant relevance was found between the HPR and the ischemic events in 1 year of follow-up (P = 0.001).ConclusionsCYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3 had a significant impact on clopidogrel response, but was not associated with ischemic events during 1 year of follow-up in patients with acute ischemic stroke. HPR was an independent risk factor for ischemic events, and the VerifyNow P2Y12 test may be available to guide individualized antiplatelet therapies in stroke patients in China.

Dataset Information

Both PON1 Q192R and CYP2C19*2 influence platelet response to clopidogrel and ischemic events in Chinese patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Publications

Both PON1 Q192R and CYP2C19*2 influence platelet response to clopidogrel and ischemic events in Chinese patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure