How effective are patient safety initiatives? A retrospective patient record review study of changes to patient safety over time.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objectives
To assess whether, compared with previous years, hospital care became safer in 2011/2012, expressing itself in a fall in preventable adverse event (AE) rates alongside patient safety initiatives.Design
Retrospective patient record review at three points in time.Setting
In three national AE studies, patient records of 2004, 2008 and 2011/2012 were reviewed in, respectively, 21 hospitals in 2004, 20 hospitals in 2008 and 20 hospitals in 2011/2012. In each hospital, 400, 200 and 200 patient records were sampled, respectively.Participants
In total, 15 997 patient admissions were included in the study, 7926 patient admissions from 2004, 4023 from 2008 and 4048 from 2011/2012.Interventions
The main patient safety initiatives in hospital care at a national level between 2004 and 2012 have been small as well as large-scale multifaceted programmes.Main outcome measures
Rates of both AEs and preventable AEs.Results
Uncorrected crude overall AE rates showed no change in 2011/2012 in comparison with 2008, whereas preventable AE rates showed a reduction of 45%. After multilevel corrections, the decrease in preventable AE rate in 2011/2012 was still clearly visible with a decrease of 30% in comparison to 2008 (p=0.10). In 2011/2012, fewer preventable AEs were found in older age groups, or related to the surgical process, in comparison with 2008.Conclusions
Our study shows some improvements in preventable AEs in the areas that were addressed during the comprehensive national safety programme. There are signs that such a programme has a positive impact on patient safety.
SUBMITTER: Baines R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4552927 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:ObjectivesThis review was commissioned by WHO, South Africa-Country office because of an exponential increase in medical litigation claims related to patient safety in obstetrical care in the country. A rapid review was conducted to examine the effectiveness of quality improvement (QI) strategies on maternal and newborn patient safety outcomes, risk of litigation and burden of associated costs.DesignA rapid review of the literature was conducted to provide decision-makers with timely evidence. Medical and legal databases (eg, MEDLINE, Embase, LexisNexis Academic, etc) and reference lists of relevant studies were searched. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, abstracted data and appraised risk of bias. Results were summarised narratively.InterventionsWe included randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of QI strategies targeting health systems (eg, team changes) and healthcare providers (eg, clinician education) to improve the safety of women and their newborns. Eligible studies were limited to trials published in English between 2004 and 2015.Primary and secondary outcome measuresRCTs reporting on patient safety outcomes (eg, stillbirths, mortality and caesarean sections), litigation claims and associated costs were included.ResultsThe search yielded 4793 citations, of which 10 RCTs met our eligibility criteria and provided information on over 500?000 participants. The results are presented by QI strategy, which varied from one study to another. Studies including provider education alone (one RCT), provider education in combination with audit and feedback (two RCTs) or clinician reminders (one RCT), as well as provider education with patient education and audit and feedback (one RCT), reported some improvements to patient safety outcomes. None of the studies reported on litigation claims or the associated costs.ConclusionsOur results suggest that provider education and other QI strategy combinations targeting healthcare providers may improve the safety of women and their newborns during childbirth.
| S-EPMC6042535 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine if the implementation of large-scale patient safety initiatives have been successful in reducing overall and preventable adverse event rates in hospital inpatients.DesignThe design used in this study was systematic review and meta-analysis.Data resourcesWe followed our published protocol (PROSPERO [CRD42019140058]) and searched the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Embase from inception to February 2020. The reference lists of eligible studies were also searched.EligibilityAll longitudinal retrospective record review studies that examined adverse event rates before and after the introduction of patient safety initiatives in hospital inpatients were included.Data extractionData extraction, quality, and risk of bias assessment were carried out by 2 independent reviewers. Information on study design, setting, demographics, interventions, and safety outcome measures was extracted.ResultsA total of 3894 articles were screened, and 7 articles met the eligibility criteria for our systematic review with 5 of these providing sufficient information for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The degree of heterogeneity was high among studies. The meta-analysis demonstrated a minimal risk reduction in overall adverse event rates of 0.017 (95% confidence interval, 0.002-0.032) when the lower-quality studies were excluded, with one adverse event being prevented for every 59 hospital admissions.ConclusionsThese findings are significant when the large numbers of admissions to a hospital every year are considered. Given the low numbers of large-scale implementation studies, there is a need for more research on the effectiveness of patient safety initiatives to further assess the impact of such initiatives on adverse events.
| S-EPMC7908854 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesDocumentation of allergies in a coded, non-free-text format in the electronic health record (EHR) triggers clinical decision support to prevent adverse events. Health system-wide patient safety initiatives to improve EHR allergy documentation by specifically decreasing free-text allergy entries have not been reported. The goal of this initiative was to systematically reduce free-text allergen entries in the EHR allergy module.MethodsWe assessed free-text allergy entries in a commercial EHR used at a multihospital integrated health care system in the greater Boston area. Using both manual and automated methods, a multidisciplinary consensus group prioritized high-risk and frequently used free-text allergens for conversion to coded entries, added new allergen entries, and deleted duplicate allergen entries. Environmental allergies were moved to the patient problem list.ResultsWe identified 242,330 free-text entries, which included a variety of environmental allergies (42%), food allergies (18%), contrast media allergies (13%), "no known allergy" (12%), drug allergies (2%), and "no contrast allergy" (2%). Most free-text entries were entered by medical assistants in ambulatory settings (34%) and registered nurses in perioperative settings (20%). We remediated a total of 52,206 free-text entries with automated methods and 79,578 free-text entries with manual methods.ConclusionsThrough this multidisciplinary intervention, we identified and remediated 131,784 free-text entries in our EHR to improve clinical decision support and patient safety. Additional strategies are required to completely eliminate free-text allergy entry, and establish systematic, consistent, and safe guidelines for documenting allergies.
| S-EPMC7704710 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:There is limited research, and guidance, on how to address safety in general practice proactively. OBJECTIVES:This review aimed to synthesize the literature describing the use of patient record review (PRR) to measure and improve patient safety in primary care. The PRR methodologies utilized and the resulting outcomes were examined. METHODS:Searches were conducted using Medline, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO in February 2017. Reference lists of included studies and existing review papers were also screened. English language, peer-reviewed studies that utilized PRR to identify patient safety incidents (PSIs) occurring in general practice were included. Two researchers independently extracted data from articles and applied the Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Designs. RESULTS:A total of 3265 studies were screened, with 15 included. Trigger tools were the most frequent method used for the PRRs (n = 6). The mean number of safety incidents per 100 records was 12.6. Within studies, a mean of 30.6% of incidents were associated with severe harm (range 8.6-50%), and a mean of 55.6% of incidents was considered preventable (range 32.7-93.5%). The most commonly identified types of PSIs related to medication and prescribing, diagnosis, communication and treatment. Three studies reported on improvement actions taken after the PRRs. CONCLUSION:This review suggests that PRR may be a promising means of proactively identifying patient safety incidents and informing improvements.
| S-EPMC6104614 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Rationale & Objective Identification of treatable risk factors for kidney allograft failure is necessary to improve graft longevity. Metabolic acidosis with either low serum bicarbonate or normal serum bicarbonate (eubicarbonatemic metabolic acidosis) is implicated in native kidney disease progression but its effects in kidney transplant recipients are unclear. Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting & Participants An Integrated Claims-Clinical dataset of US patients with chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rates <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and serum bicarbonate data were used to generate a cohort of kidney transplant recipients with data from ≥1 year before and after transplantation. Primary Predictor The primary independent variable was a change in serum bicarbonate from baseline. Outcomes The primary outcomes were graft failure and all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiac events and all-cause hospitalization. Analytical Approach We used adjusted time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models to assess the risk of graft failure, all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac events, and time to first hospitalization. Results In this US community-based cohort of 1,915 kidney transplant recipients with a median follow-up of ∼2.5 years, each 1-mEq/L increase in serum bicarbonate was associated with significantly lower hazard of graft loss, death, major adverse cardiac events, and hospitalization by 10%, 8%, 4%, and 8%, respectively. Limitations Possible residual confounding. Conclusions In a US community-based population of kidney transplant recipients, even small incremental increases in serum bicarbonate (1 mEq/L) were significantly associated with reduced hazard of graft loss, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. Interventional trials evaluating the potential benefits of treating metabolic acidosis in kidney transplant recipients are warranted. Visual Abstract
| S-EPMC9850186 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSince 2007, Cancer Care Ontario has been collecting data using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System as a patient-reported outcome measure for use in routine care. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the factors associated with Edmonton Symptom Assessment System uptake among cancer patients seen at regional cancer centres and to examine if these associations have changed over time.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study among cancer patients eligible to complete Edmonton Symptom Assessment System assessments who were seen at regional cancer centres in Ontario between 2007 and 2015. We used linked administrative sources of health care data. Our primary outcome for each patient was defined as the rate of ESAS assessments, which was analyzed overall and on an annual basis.ResultsWe identified 525 409 unique patients with at least 1 visit to a cancer centre during the study period. The percentage of patients with at least 1 Edmonton Symptom Assessment System assessment increased from 5% in 2007 to 67% in 2015. Analysis demonstrated that variation by region and by cancer type decreased over time: relative rates for region ranged from 0.31 to 13.3 in 2007 whereas they ranged from 0.7 to 1.56 in 2015, and relative rates for cancer type ranged from 0.03 to 1.0 in 2007 whereas they ranged from 0.55 to 1.0 in 2015. In 2015 women and people living in poorer neighbourhoods had a lower Edmonton Symptom Assessment System uptake (relative rate 0.93 and 0.91, respectively).InterpretationOntario has implemented a patient-reported outcome program across the province; over time, uptake has improved and variation by cancer type and region has decreased. Variation persists for other patient characteristics, which suggests that there are opportunities to improve equity in the program.
| S-EPMC6380903 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Introduction:Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is important for improving patient outcomes and patient safety; however, interprofessional education (IPE) is required to develop skills necessary for successful IPC. IPE is resource intensive and requires advance planning and negotiation of logistical challenges. The goal of this faculty development workshop is to train administrators and educators from academic health care institutions to address potential challenges faced during design and implementation of IPE programs. Methods:This educational module presents best practices for implementing simulation-based IPE to enhance patient safety through an interactive workshop. We utilize hands-on practice with coaching through a facilitated small-group tabletop simulation followed by a large-group discussion driven by the case-based method to maximize learning and engage a diverse audience. The materials associated with the module include a workshop outline, a PowerPoint slide show, and a summary handout for the participants. To facilitate the tabletop simulation and the subsequent large-group discussion, we have included two versions of the small-group prompts, a worksheet for the participants to complete during the tabletop exercise, and a facilitator guide. Results:We have received positive feedback regarding the learning value of the module from faculty attendees at a regional simulation conference as well as the International Meeting on Simulation in Healthcare in January of 2016. Discussion:Implementing simulation-based IPE curricula to address patient safety initiatives comes with a unique set of challenges that require prior training and knowledge. We provide insight and evidence-based strategies in this module to help interested parties successfully implement their own programs.
| S-EPMC6464423 | biostudies-other
Project description:BACKGROUND:The rapid implementation of patient portals, through which patients can view their electronic health record, creates possibilities for information exchange and communication between patients and health care professionals. However, real-time disclosure of test results and clinical reports poses a source of concern. OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to examine negative experiences resulting from real-time disclosure of medical information through a patient portal. METHODS:Data were collected over a 2-year period in 4 datasets consisting of incidents reported by health care professionals, complaints of patients, patient issues at a portal helpdesk, and a survey among health care professionals. Incidents, complaints, issues, and answers on the survey were counted and analyzed through an iterative process of coding. RESULTS:Within the chosen time frame of 2 years, on average, 7978 patients per month logged into the portal at least once. The amount of negative incidents and complaints was limited. A total of 6 incidents, 4 complaints, and 2506 issues at the helpdesk concerning the patient portal were reported, of which only 2, 1, and 3 cases of these respective databases concerned real-time disclosure of medical information through the patient portal. Moreover, 32 out of 216 health care professionals reported patients that had negative experiences with real-time disclosure. Most negative consequences concerned confused and anxious patients when confronted with unexpected or incomprehensible results. CONCLUSIONS:Real-time access through a patient portal did not substantially result in negative consequences. The negative consequences that did occur can be mitigated by adequate preparation and instruction of patients concerning the various functionalities of the patient portal, real-time disclosure of test results in particular, and can also be managed through educating health care professionals about the patient portal and making adjustments in the daily practice of health care professionals.
| S-EPMC7055752 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ContextIncident-reporting systems (IRSs) are used to gather information about patient safety incidents. Despite the financial burden they imply, however,little is known about their effectiveness. This article systematically reviews the effectiveness of IRSs as a method of improving patient safety through organizational learning.MethodsOur systematic literature review identified 2 groups of studies: (1)those comparing the effectiveness of IRSs with other methods of error reporting and (2) those examining the effectiveness of IRSs on settings, structures, and outcomes in regard to improving patient safety. We used thematic analysis to compare the effectiveness of IRSs with other methods and to synthesize what was effective, where, and why. Then, to assess the evidence concerning the ability of IRSs to facilitate organizational learning, we analyzed studies using the concepts of single-loop and double-loop learning.FindingsIn total, we identified 43 studies, 8 that compared IRSs with other methods and 35 that explored the effectiveness of IRSs on settings, structures,and outcomes. We did not find strong evidence that IRSs performed better than other methods. We did find some evidence of single-loop learning, that is, changes to clinical settings or processes as a consequence of learning from IRSs, but little evidence of either improvements in outcomes or changes in the latent managerial factors involved in error production. In addition, there was insubstantial evidence of IRSs enabling double-loop learning, that is, a cultural change or a change in mind-set.ConclusionsThe results indicate that IRSs could be more effective if the criteria for what counts as an incident were explicit, they were owned and ledby clinical teams rather than centralized hospital departments, and they were embedded within organizations as part of wider safety programs.
| S-EPMC4678941 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Calling Cards is a platform technology to record a cumulative history of transient protein-DNA interactions in the genome of genetically targeted cell types. The record of these interactions are recovered by next generation sequencing. Compared to other genomic assays, whose readout provides a snapshot at the time of harvest, Calling Cards enables correlation of historical molecular states to eventual outcomes or phenotypes. To achieve this, Calling Cards uses the piggyBac transposase to insert self-reporting transposon (SRT) “Calling Cards” into the genome, leaving permanent marks at interaction sites. Calling Cards can be deployed in a variety of in vitro and in vivo biological systems to study gene regulatory networks involved in development, aging, and disease. Out of the box, it assesses enhancer usage but can be adapted to profile specific transcription factor binding with custom transcription factor (TF)-piggyBac fusion proteins. The Calling Cards workflow has five main stages: delivery of Calling Card reagents, sample preparation, library preparation, sequencing, and data analysis. Here, we first present a comprehensive guide for experimental design, reagent selection, and optional customization of the platform to study additional TFs. Then, we provide an updated protocol for the five steps, using reagents that improve throughput and decrease costs, including an overview of a newly deployed computational pipeline. This protocol is designed for users with basic molecular biology experience to process samples into sequencing libraries in 1-2 days. Familiarity with bioinformatic analysis and command line tools is required to set up the pipeline in a high performance computing environment and to conduct downstream analyses.
2023-02-01 | GSE223926 | GEO