Dataset Information

A Comparison of Free-Standing versus Co-Located Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Long-term acute care hospitals (LTACs) provide specialized treatment for patients with chronic critical illness. Increasingly LTACs are co-located within traditional short-stay hospitals rather than operated as free-standing facilities, which may affect LTAC utilization patterns and outcomes.

Methods

We compared free-standing and co-located LTACs using 2005 data from the United States Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. We used bivariate analyses to examine patient characteristics and timing of LTAC transfer, and used propensity matching and multivariable regression to examine mortality, readmissions, and costs after transfer.

Results

Of 379 LTACs in our sample, 192 (50.7%) were free-standing and 187 (49.3%) were co-located in a short-stay hospital. Co-located LTACs were smaller (median bed size: 34 vs. 66, p <0.001) and more likely to be for-profit (72.2% v. 68.8%, p = 0.001) than freestanding LTACs. Co-located LTACs admitted patients later in their hospital course (average time prior to transfer: 15.5 days vs. 14.0 days) and were more likely to admit patients for ventilator weaning (15.9% vs. 12.4%). In the multivariate propensity-matched analysis, patients in co-located LTACs experienced higher 180-day mortality (adjusted relative risk: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00-1.11, p = 0.04) but lower readmission rates (adjusted relative risk: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75-0.98, p = 0.02). Costs were similar between the two hospital types (mean difference in costs within 180 days of transfer: -$3,580, 95% CI: -$8,720 -$1,550, p = 0.17).

Conclusions

Compared to patients in free-standing LTACs, patients in co-located LTACs experience slightly higher mortality but lower readmission rates, with no change in overall resource use as measured by 180 day costs.

SUBMITTER: Kahn JM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4595282 | biostudies-literature | 2015

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A Comparison of Free-Standing versus Co-Located Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals.

Kahn Jeremy M JM Barnato Amber E AE Lave Judith R JR Pike Francis F Weissfeld Lisa A LA Le Tri Q TQ Angus Derek C DC

PloS one 20151006 10

<h4>Background</h4>Long-term acute care hospitals (LTACs) provide specialized treatment for patients with chronic critical illness. Increasingly LTACs are co-located within traditional short-stay hospitals rather than operated as free-standing facilities, which may affect LTAC utilization patterns and outcomes.<h4>Methods</h4>We compared free-standing and co-located LTACs using 2005 data from the United States Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. We used bivariate analyses to examine patien ...[more]

PMID: 26440102

Similar Datasets

Project description:Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) may represent a phenomenon associated with sources of atrial fibrillation (AF) and are being used increasingly as targets of catheter ablation. However, current methods have limited efficacy for characterizing CFAEs important to substrate arrhythmogenicity and do not measure electrogram morphology.The purpose of this study was to develop a methodology for quantifying the degree of morphologic heterogeneity in CFAE deflections, and to determine whether there are differences in this measurement between paroxysmal and persistent AF patients.Two successive bipolar CFAEs of length 8.4 seconds each were acquired during AF from two sites each at the ostia of the four pulmonary veins (PVs) and from the anterior and posterior left atrial free wall in patients with paroxysmal AF (N = 10) and long-standing persistent AF (N = 10). Extrinsic and intrinsic features of electrogram shape were used to characterize fractionation in CFAE sequences. The extrinsic parameters were the amplitude, upslope, downslope, and width of each deflection. The intrinsic parameter was the voltage profile as characterized by the sum of absolute values. These measurements were compared to the mean interval between CFAE deflections, a standard fractionation indicator.The variability of intrinsic/extrinsic morphologic parameters was higher in paroxysmal than persistent AF at the left superior PV (P < or =.003), the posterior left atrial free wall, anterior left atrial free wall, left inferior PV, and right superior PV (P <.05 for most parameters), and the right inferior PV (not significant). Mean CFAE deflection intervals were longer at all locations in paroxysmal AF but were significant only at the left superior PV and posterior left atrial free wall (P <.05). Quantitative morphologic parameters were not well correlated with dominant frequency (r(2) <0.32); thus, our new measures are robust to changes in activation rate.A novel method for quantifying CFAEs, independent of activation rate, has been developed. The method demonstrates greater significance in the difference between CFAE morphology in paroxysmal and long-standing AF compared with mean interval between CFAE deflections. The differences identified suggest that CFAE morphology may evolve as AF persists.

Project description:BackgroundLong-term acute care hospital (LTACH) use varies considerably across the U.S., which may reflect uncertainty about the effectiveness of LTACHs vs. skilled nursing facilities (SNF), the principal post-acute care alternative. Given that LTACHs provide more intensive care and thus receive over triple the reimbursement of SNFs for comparable diagnoses, we sought to compare outcomes and spending between LTACH versus SNF transfer.MethodsUsing Medicare claims linked to electronic health record (EHR) data from six Texas Hospitals between 2009 and 2010, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized on a medicine service in a high-LTACH use region and discharged to either an LTACH or SNF and followed for one year. The primary outcomes included mortality, 60-day recovery without inpatient care, days at home, and healthcare spending RESULTS: Of 3503 patients, 18% were transferred to an LTACH. Patients transferred to LTACHs were younger (median 71 vs. 82 years), less likely to be female (50.5 vs 66.6%) and white (69.0 vs. 84.1%), but were sicker (24.3 vs. 14.2% for prolonged intensive care unit stay; median diagnosis resource intensity weight of 2.03 vs. 1.38). In unadjusted analyses, patients transferred to an LTACH vs. SNF were less likely to survive (59.1 vs. 65.0%) or recover (62.5 vs 66.0%), and spent fewer days at home (186 vs. 200). Adjusting for demographic and clinical confounders available in Medicare claims and EHR data, LTACH transfer was not significantly associated with differences in mortality (HR, 1.12, 95% CI, 0.94-1.33), recovery (SHR, 1.07, 0.93-1.23), and days spent at home (IRR, 0.96, 0.83-1.10), but was associated with greater Medicare spending ($16,689 for one year, 95% CI, $12,216-$21,162).ConclusionLTACH transfer for Medicare beneficiaries is associated with similar clinical outcomes but with higher healthcare spending compared to SNF transfer. LTACH use should be reserved for patients who require complex inpatient care and cannot be cared for in SNFs.

Dataset Information

A Comparison of Free-Standing versus Co-Located Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

A Comparison of Free-Standing versus Co-Located Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets