Dataset Information

Determination of the optimal case definition for the diagnosis of end-stage renal disease from administrative claims data in Manitoba, Canada.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a major public health problem with increasing prevalence and costs. An understanding of the long-term trends in dialysis rates and outcomes can help inform health policy. We determined the optimal case definition for the diagnosis of ESRD using administrative claims data in the province of Manitoba over a 7-year period.

Methods

We determined the sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and overall accuracy of 4 administrative case definitions for the diagnosis of ESRD requiring chronic dialysis over different time horizons from Jan. 1, 2004, to Mar. 31, 2011. The Manitoba Renal Program Database served as the gold standard for confirming dialysis status.

Results

During the study period, 2562 patients were registered as recipients of chronic dialysis in the Manitoba Renal Program Database. Over a 1-year period (2010), the optimal case definition was any 2 claims for outpatient dialysis, and it was 74.6% sensitive (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.3%-76.9%) and 94.4% specific (95% CI 93.6%-95.2%) for the diagnosis of ESRD. In contrast, a case definition of at least 2 claims for dialysis treatment more than 90 days apart was 64.8% sensitive (95% CI 62.2%-67.3%) and 97.1% specific (95% CI 96.5%-97.7%). Extending the period to 5 years greatly improved sensitivity for all case definitions, with minimal change to specificity; for example, for the optimal case definition of any 2 claims for dialysis treatment, sensitivity increased to 86.0% (95% CI 84.7%-87.4%) at 5 years.

Conclusion

Accurate case definitions for the diagnosis of ESRD requiring dialysis can be derived from administrative claims data. The optimal definition required any 2 claims for outpatient dialysis. Extending the claims period to 5 years greatly improved sensitivity with minimal effects on specificity for all case definitions.

SUBMITTER: Komenda P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4596097 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose of reviewGenetic testing can improve diagnostic precision in some patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) providing the potential for targeted therapy and improved patient outcomes. We sought to describe the genetic architecture of ESRD and Canadian data sources available for further genetic investigation into ESRD.Sources of informationWe performed PubMed searches of English, peer-reviewed articles using keywords "chronic kidney disease," "ESRD," "genetics," "sequencing," and "administrative databases," and searched for nephrology-related Mendelian diseases on the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man database.MethodsIn this narrative review, we discuss our evolving understanding of the genetic architecture of kidney disease and ESRD, the risks and benefits of using genetic data to help diagnose and manage patients with ESRD, existing public Canadian biobanks and databases, and a vision for future genetic studies of ESRD in Canada.Key findingsESRD has a polygenic architecture including rare Mendelian mutations and common small effect genetic polymorphism contributors. Genetic testing will improve diagnostic accuracy and contribute to a precision medicine approach in nephrology. However, the risk and benefits of genetic testing needs to be considered from an individual and societal perspective, and further research is required. Merging existing health data, linking biobanks and administrative databases, and forming Canadian collaborations hold great potential for genetic research into ESRD. Large sample sizes are necessary to perform the suitably powered investigations required to bring this vision to reality.LimitationsThis is a narrative review of the literature discussing future directions and opportunities. It reflects the views and academic biases of the authors.ImplicationsNational collaborations will be required to obtain sample sizes required for impactful, robust research. Merging established datasets may be one approach to obtain adequate samples. Patient education and engagement will improve the value of knowledge gained.

Project description:BackgroundNearly 30 years ago, a series of studies showed increased hip fracture mortality in Manitoba compared to the United States, but these data have not been updated. Our objective was to compare the organization of hip fracture care and short-term outcomes in Manitoba and New York State using contemporary data.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of administrative data for all adults aged 50 years or more admitted to hospital with hip fracture between Jan. 1, 2011, and Oct. 31, 2013 in Manitoba and New York State. We compared the 2 jurisdictions with respect to: 1) the proportion of hospitals treating hip fracture and annual hip fracture volume, 2) hospital length of stay, 3) death and 4) hospital readmission. We used descriptive statistics, univariate methods and regression models to compare differences in care between jurisdictions.ResultsWe identified 2845 patients (mean age 82.2 yr, 2061 women [72.4%]) with hip fracture in Manitoba and 31 524 patients (mean age 81.9 yr, 22 973 women [72.9%]) with hip fracture in New York. A smaller proportion of hospitals in Manitoba than in New York treated hip fracture (7/30 [23%] v. 180/239 [75.3%]) (p < 0.001); the mean annual hospital hip fracture volume was higher in Manitoba (140.0) than in New York (68.9), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.2). For patients with femoral neck fractures, the median hospital length of stay was longer in Manitoba than in New York (13 d v. 7 d). The rate of death within 7 days of admission was similar in Manitoba and New York (1.3% v. 2.0%, p = 0.07), although the rate of in-hospital death was higher in Manitoba (5.7% v. 3.5%, p < 0.001). Readmission within 30 days of discharge was less frequent in Manitoba than in New York (9.8% v. 12.0%, p = 0.02). Results were similar for patients with intertrochanteric fractures.InterpretationPoor short-term outcomes for patients with hip fracture in Manitoba that were documented in the 1980s seem to have been eliminated. Our results should provide optimism that reengineering of clinical care can produce substantive improvements in quality.

Project description:INTRODUCTION:Lifestyle factors, such as diet, physical activity and sleep, are associated with the development of many chronic diseases. The objective of The Manitoba Personalized Lifestyle Research study is to understand how these lifestyle factors interact with each other and with other factors, such as an individual's genetics and gut microbiome, to influence health. METHODS:An observational study of adults, with extensive phenotyping by objective health and lifestyle assessments, and retrospective assessment of early life experiences, with retrospective and prospective utilisation of secondary data from administrative health records. STUDY POPULATION:A planned non-random convenience sample of 840 Manitobans aged 30-46 recruited from the general population, stratified by sex (equal men and women), body mass index (BMI; 60% of participants with a BMI>25?kg/m2) and geography (25% from rural areas). These stratifications were selected based on Manitoba demographics. MEASUREMENTS:Lifestyle factors assessed will include dietary pattern, physical activity, cardiovascular fitness, and sleep. Factors such as medical history, socioeconomic status, alcohol and tobacco consumption, cognition, stress, anxiety, and early life experiences will also be documented. A maternal survey will be performed. Body composition and bone density will be measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Blood pressure, pulse wave velocity, and augmentation index will be measured on two consecutive days. Chronic disease risk biomarkers will be measured in blood and urine samples. DNA will be extracted for genetic analysis. A faecal sample will be collected for microbiome analysis. Participants may provide their Manitoba personal health information number to link their study data with administrative health records. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:Ethics approval has been obtained from the University of Manitoba Health Research Ethics Board (protocol # HS18951; 05/01/2016). Data analysis, release of results and publication of manuscripts are scheduled to start in early 2019. Additional information at www.TMPLR.ca. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:NCT03674957; Pre-results.