Arrhythmogenic remodeling of ?2 versus ?1 adrenergic signaling in the human failing heart.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Arrhythmia is the major cause of death in patients with heart failure, for which ?-adrenergic receptor blockers are a mainstay therapy. But the role of ?-adrenergic signaling in electrophysiology and arrhythmias has never been studied in human ventricles.We used optical imaging of action potentials and [Ca(2+)]i transients to compare the ?1- and ?2-adrenergic responses in left ventricular wedge preparations of human donor and failing hearts. ?1-Stimulation significantly increased conduction velocity, shortened action potential duration, and [Ca(2+)]i transients duration (CaD) in donor but not in failing hearts, because of desensitization of ?1-adrenergic receptor in heart failure. In contrast, ?2-stimulation increased conduction velocity in both donor and failing hearts but shortened action potential duration only in failing hearts. ?2-Stimulation also affected transmural heterogeneity in action potential duration but not in [Ca(2+)]i transients duration. Both ?1- and ?2-stimulation augmented the vulnerability and frequency of ectopic activity and enhanced substrates for ventricular tachycardia in failing, but not in donor, hearts. Both ?1- and ?2-stimulation enhanced Purkinje fiber automaticity, whereas only ?2-stimulation promoted Ca-mediated premature ventricular contractions in heart failure.During end-stage heart failure, ?2-stimulation creates arrhythmogenic substrates via conduction velocity regulation and transmurally heterogeneous repolarization. ?2-Stimulation is, therefore, more arrhythmogenic than ?1-stimulation. In particular, ?2-stimulation increases the transmural difference between [Ca(2+)]i transients duration and action potential duration, which facilitates the formation of delayed afterdepolarizations.
SUBMITTER: Lang D
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4608687 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Apr
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA