Dataset Information

Comparing the efficacy and neuroinflammatory potential of three anti-abeta antibodies.

ABSTRACT: Immunotherapy is a promising strategy for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Antibodies directed against Amyloid Beta (A?) are able to successfully clear plaques and reverse cognitive deficits in mouse models. Excitement towards this approach has been tempered by high profile failures in the clinic, one key issue has been the development of inflammatory side effects in the brain (ARIAs). New antibodies are entering the clinic for Alzheimer's disease; therefore, it is important to learn all we can from the current generation. In this study, we directly compared 3 clinical candidates in the same pre-clinical model, with the same effector function, for their ability to clear plaques and induce inflammation in the brain. We produced murine versions of the antibodies: Bapineuzumab (3D6), Crenezumab (mC2) and Gantenerumab (chGantenerumab) with an IgG2a constant region. 18-month transgenic APP mice (Tg2576) were injected bilaterally into the hippocampus with 2 µg of each antibody or control. After 7 days, the mice tissue was analysed for clearance of plaques and neuroinflammation by histology and biochemical analysis. 3D6 was the best binder to plaques and in vitro, whilst mC2 bound the least strongly. This translated into 3D6 effectively clearing plaques and reducing the levels of insoluble A?, whilst chGantenerumab and mC2 did not. 3D6 caused a significant increase in the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1? and TNF?, and an associated increase in microglial expression of CD11B and CD68. chGantenerumab increased pro-inflammatory cytokines and microglial activation, but minimal changes in CD68, as an indicator of phagocytosis. Injection of mC2 did not cause any significant inflammatory changes. Our results demonstrate that the ability of an antibody to clear plaques and induce inflammation is dependent on the epitope and affinity of the antibody.

SUBMITTER: Fuller JP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4612324 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparing the efficacy and neuroinflammatory potential of three anti-abeta antibodies.

Fuller James P JP Stavenhagen Jeffrey B JB Christensen Søren S Kartberg Fredrik F Glennie Martin J MJ Teeling Jessica L JL

Acta neuropathologica 20151003 5

Immunotherapy is a promising strategy for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Antibodies directed against Amyloid Beta (Aβ) are able to successfully clear plaques and reverse cognitive deficits in mouse models. Excitement towards this approach has been tempered by high profile failures in the clinic, one key issue has been the development of inflammatory side effects in the brain (ARIAs). New antibodies are entering the clinic for Alzheimer's disease; therefore, it is important to learn a ...[more]

PMID: 26433971

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Multiple anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies have been approved, and in some diseases, there is a choice of more than one. Comparative efficacy, safety and tolerability are unknown. Methods: Randomized trials (RCTs) supporting the registration of single agent anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 inhibitors between 2015-2019 were identified. We extracted the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and calculated the odds ratio (OR) for commonly reported safety and tolerability outcomes. We then performed a network meta-analysis, reporting multiple pair-wise comparisons between different anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. Results: Sixteen RCTs comprising 10673 patients were included; 10 in non-small-cell lung cancer, 2 in melanoma, 2 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and 2 in urothelial cancer. Compared to pembrolizumab, efficacy was similar for nivolumab (HR: 1.02 95% CI: 0.91-1.14) and for atezolizumab (HR: 0.97 95% CI: 0.85-1.10), however, avelumab appeared inferior (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06-1.56). Pembrolizumab showed similar odds of serious adverse events (SAEs) as nivolumab (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.56-2.27) and atezolizumab (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.55-2.04). Compared to nivolumab, atezolizumab was associated with more SAEs (OR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.47-3.12). Avelumab had the lowest odds of grade 3-4 adverse events compared to pembrolizumab (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.24-0.74), nivolumab (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.24-0.62) and atezolizumab (OR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.14-0.33). The odds of treatment discontinuation without progression were similar between nivolumab and atezolizumab (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.73-2.00), and between pembrolizumab and nivolumab (OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.83-2.17), but was higher with atezolizumab compared to nivolumab (OR: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.29-5.00). Pembrolizumab was associated with higher OR of immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) compared to nivolumab (OR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.49-3.03) and atezolizumab (OR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.09-2.43). Conclusions: Pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and atezolizumab have similar efficacy. Avelumab appears less efficacious. Safety and tolerability seem better with avelumab, but worse with atezolizumab and pembrolizumab.

Project description:Ebselen (EBS) is an organo-selenium-containing compound that has anti-inflammatory, antitumor, and antibacterial properties. EBS is being explored as a possible treatment for reperfusion injury and stroke and is under clinical trials as a mimetic of lithium for the treatment of bipolar disorder [Mota et al. Synapse 2020, 74 (7), 1-6] and noise-induced hearing loss as a result of these actives [Martini et al. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2019, 109, 107-117. Slusarczyk et al. Neural Regener. Res. 2019, 17 (7), 1255-1261. Thangamani et al. PLoS One 2015, 10 (7), e0133877. Kil et al. Lancet 2017, 390 (10098), 969-979]. However, we wanted to characterize derivatives of EBS as neuroprotective, anti-neuroinflammatory, and antioxidant compounds. Recently, we have reported on a new thermal and photoinduced copper-mediated cross-coupling between potassium selenocyanate (KSeCN) and N-substituted ortho-halobenzamides to form ebselen derivatives with increased synthetic efficiency [Thanna et al. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82 (7), 3844-3854]. Our synthesis allows for the varying of the remote benzene ring with various substituents or replacing that ring with heterocyclic rings such as pyridine, pyrrole, thiophene, etc. In this study, we synthesized seven new heterocyclic EBS derivatives to further diversify our EBS library. These 21 compounds were then evaluated for their neuroprotective properties, with four compounds showing an equal or better neuroprotective profile than EBS. Compounds 5, 9, 23, and 27 showed 73, 86, 80, 84% cell viability, respectively, at a 10 μM concentration. These studies were performed using human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells in an oxygen and glucose deprivation (OGD) model of ischemia. At the same concentration, these compounds significantly inhibited lipopolysaccharide-induced nitric oxide and tumor necrosis factor alpha release from Human microglia clone 3 microglial cells. Compounds 9 and 27 showed significantly increased cell viability (84 and 80%, respectively) for SH-SY5Y cells exposed to microglia-activated media. These compounds showed only mild GPx-like reductive activity, with compounds 2, 7, 12, and 14 (115, 96, 95, and 82%, respectively) showing a higher percent rate of oxidation of NADPH in a coupled reaction assay compared to ebselen. This research highlights several derivatives of ebselen that show improved activity as neuroprotective agents over the parent compound.

Project description:BackgroundAnti-drug antibodies (ADAs) to bococizumab were detected in > 40% of subjects in the SPIRE lipid-lowering trials. The risk of cross-reactivity between anti-bococizumab antibodies and other approved anti-proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type-9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) was investigated using a single-assay approach.MethodsBococizumab immunogenicity was assessed in SPIRE-HR, a 52-week study. The highest ADA titer sample from each ADA-positive subject (n = 155) was tested in vitro for cross-reactivity to alirocumab and evolocumab using a novel ADA assay approach. Additional specificity tiers within the bococizumab ADA assay against each drug were validated using recombinant PCSK9 as a surrogate cross-reactive positive control. If the highest ADA titer sample showed cross-reactivity, additional samples from that subject were analyzed. Cross-reactivity was determined by the ability of alirocumab or evolocumab to inhibit the sample signal greater than or equal to the cross-reactivity cut-points.ResultsADAs were detected in 44.0% (155/352) of bococizumab-treated subjects, and 27.0% also developed neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Median ADA and NAb titers ranged from 276 to 526 and 8 to 12 over the course of the study, respectively. From 155 ADA-positive subjects tested for cross-reactivity, one (0.6%) subject showed weak cross-reactivity to both alirocumab and evolocumab. This cross-reactivity signal was transient (from Days 337 to 373) and undetectable at the last ADA-positive timepoint (Day 407).ConclusionA novel, single-assay approach was validated to assess the potential cross-reactivity of anti-bococizumab antibodies to alirocumab and evolocumab. In subjects who developed ADAs to bococizumab, the likelihood of clinically relevant cross-reactivity to marketed anti-PCSK9 mAbs is remote, based on the low frequency of cross-reactivity observed, which was weak in signal inhibition and transient in nature.Clinical trial registrationThe SPIRE-HR study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT01968954.

Dataset Information

Comparing the efficacy and neuroinflammatory potential of three anti-abeta antibodies.

Publications

Comparing the efficacy and neuroinflammatory potential of three anti-abeta antibodies.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets