Dataset Information

Autoinduction Specificities of the Lantibiotics Subtilin and Nisin.

ABSTRACT: The biosynthesis of the lantibiotics subtilin and nisin is regulated by autoinduction via two-component systems. Although subtilin is structurally closely related to nisin and contains the same lanthionine ring structure, both lantibiotics specifically autoinduce their biosynthesis. Subtilin and also the subtilin-like lantibiotics entianin and ericin autoinduce the two-component system SpaRK of Bacillus subtilis, whereas the biosynthesis of nisin is autoinduced via the two-component system NisRK of Lactococcus lactis. Autoinduction is highly specific for the respective lantibiotic and therefore of major importance for the functional expression of genetically engineered subtilin-like lantibiotics. To identify the structural features required for subtilin autoinduction, subtilin-nisin hybrids and specific point mutations of amino acid position 1 were generated. For subtilin autoinduction, the N-terminal tryptophan is the most important for full SpaK activation. The failure of subtilin to autoinduce the histidine kinase NisK mainly depends on the N-terminal tryptophan, as its single exchange to the aliphatic amino acid residues isoleucine, leucine, and valine provided NisK autoinduction. In addition, the production of subtilin variants which did not autoinduce their own biosynthesis could be rescued upon heterologous coexpression in B. subtilis DSM15029 by the autoinducing subtilin-like lantibiotic entianin.

SUBMITTER: Spieß T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4616960 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Autoinduction Specificities of the Lantibiotics Subtilin and Nisin.

Spieß Tobias T Korn Sophie Marianne SM Kötter Peter P Entian Karl-Dieter KD

Applied and environmental microbiology 20150904 22

The biosynthesis of the lantibiotics subtilin and nisin is regulated by autoinduction via two-component systems. Although subtilin is structurally closely related to nisin and contains the same lanthionine ring structure, both lantibiotics specifically autoinduce their biosynthesis. Subtilin and also the subtilin-like lantibiotics entianin and ericin autoinduce the two-component system SpaRK of Bacillus subtilis, whereas the biosynthesis of nisin is autoinduced via the two-component system NisRK ...[more]

PMID: 26341212

Similar Datasets

Project description:Lantibiotics are ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified antimicrobial compounds containing lanthionine and methyl-lanthionine residues. Nisin, one of the most extensively studied and used lantibiotics, has been shown to display very potent activity against Gram-positive bacteria, and stable resistance is rarely observed. By binding to lipid II and forming pores in the membrane, nisin can cause the efflux of cellular constituents and inhibit cell wall biosynthesis. However, the activity of nisin against Gram-negative bacteria is much lower than that against Gram-positive bacteria, mainly because lipid II is located at the inner membrane, and the rather impermeable outer membrane in Gram-negative bacteria prevents nisin from reaching lipid II. Thus, if the outer membrane-traversing efficiency of nisin could be increased, the activity against Gram-negative bacteria could, in principle, be enhanced. In this work, several relatively short peptides with activity against Gram-negative bacteria were selected from literature data to be fused as tails to the C terminus of either full or truncated nisin species. Among these, we found that one of three tails (tail 2 [T2; DKYLPRPRPV], T6 [NGVQPKY], and T8 [KIAKVALKAL]) attached to a part of nisin displayed improved activity against Gram-negative microorganisms. Next, we rationally designed and reengineered the most promising fusion peptides. Several mutants whose activity significantly outperformed that of nisin against Gram-negative pathogens were obtained. The activity of the tail 16 mutant 2 (T16m2) construct against several important Gram-negative pathogens (i.e., Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter aerogenes) was increased 4- to 12-fold compared to that of nisin. This study indicates that the rational design of nisin can selectively and significantly improve its outer membrane-permeating capacity as well as its activity against Gram-negative pathogens.IMPORTANCE Lantibiotics are antimicrobial peptides that are highly active against Gram-positive bacteria but that have relatively poor activity against most Gram-negative bacteria. Here, we modified the model lantibiotic nisin by fusing parts of it to antimicrobial peptides with known activity against Gram-negative bacteria. The appropriate selection of peptidic moieties that could be attached to (parts of) nisin could lead to a significant increase in its inhibitory activity against Gram-negative bacteria. Using this strategy, hybrids that outperformed nisin by displaying 4- to 12-fold higher levels of activity against relevant Gram-negative bacterial species were produced. This study shows the power of modified peptide engineering to alter target specificity in a desired direction.

Dataset Information

Autoinduction Specificities of the Lantibiotics Subtilin and Nisin.

Publications

Autoinduction Specificities of the Lantibiotics Subtilin and Nisin.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets