Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Stakeholder Engagement to Identify Priorities for Improving the Quality and Value of Critical Care.


ABSTRACT: Large amounts of scientific evidence are generated, but not implemented into patient care (the 'knowledge-to-care' gap). We identified and prioritized knowledge-to-care gaps in critical care as opportunities to improve the quality and value of healthcare.We used a multi-method community-based participatory research approach to engage a Network of all adult (n = 14) and pediatric (n = 2) medical-surgical intensive care units (ICUs) in a fully integrated geographically defined healthcare system serving 4 million residents. Participants included Network oversight committee members (n = 38) and frontline providers (n = 1,790). Network committee members used a modified RAND/University of California Appropriateness Methodology, to serially propose, rate (validated 9 point scale) and revise potential knowledge-to-care gaps as priorities for improvement. The priorities were sent to frontline providers for evaluation. Results were relayed back to all frontline providers for feedback.Initially, 68 knowledge-to-care gaps were proposed, rated and revised by the committee (n = 32 participants) over 3 rounds of review and resulted in 13 proposed priorities for improvement. Then, 1,103 providers (62% response rate) evaluated the priorities, and rated 9 as 'necessary' (median score 7-9). Several factors were associated with rating priorities as necessary in multivariable logistic regression, related to the provider (experience, teaching status of ICU) and topic (strength of supporting evidence, potential to benefit the patient, potential to improve patient/family experience, potential to decrease costs).A community-based participatory research approach engaged a diverse group of stakeholders to identify 9 priorities for improving the quality and value of critical care. The approach was time and cost efficient and could serve as a model to prioritize areas for research quality improvement across other settings.

SUBMITTER: Stelfox HT 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4619641 | biostudies-literature | 2015

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Stakeholder Engagement to Identify Priorities for Improving the Quality and Value of Critical Care.

Stelfox Henry T HT   Niven Daniel J DJ   Clement Fiona M FM   Bagshaw Sean M SM   Cook Deborah J DJ   McKenzie Emily E   Potestio Melissa L ML   Doig Christopher J CJ   O'Neill Barbara B   Zygun David D  

PloS one 20151022 10


<h4>Background</h4>Large amounts of scientific evidence are generated, but not implemented into patient care (the 'knowledge-to-care' gap). We identified and prioritized knowledge-to-care gaps in critical care as opportunities to improve the quality and value of healthcare.<h4>Methods</h4>We used a multi-method community-based participatory research approach to engage a Network of all adult (n = 14) and pediatric (n = 2) medical-surgical intensive care units (ICUs) in a fully integrated geograph  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8218276 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3751765 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8527860 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4645923 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8300992 | biostudies-literature