Dataset Information

Investigating decision rules with a new experimental design: the EXACT paradigm.

ABSTRACT: In the decision-making field, it is important to distinguish between the perceptual process (how information is collected) and the decision rule (the strategy governing decision-making). We propose a new paradigm, called EXogenous ACcumulation Task (EXACT) to disentangle these two components. The paradigm consists of showing a horizontal gauge that represents the probability of receiving a reward at time t and increases with time. The participant is asked to press a button when they want to request a reward. Thus, the perceptual mechanism is hard-coded and does not need to be inferred from the data. Based on this paradigm, we compared four decision rules (Bayes Risk, Reward Rate, Reward/Accuracy, and Modified Reward Rate) and found that participants appeared to behave according to the Modified Reward Rate. We propose a new way of analysing the data by using the accuracy of responses, which can only be inferred in classic RT tasks. Our analysis suggests that several experimental findings such as RT distribution and its relationship with experimental conditions, usually deemed to be the result of a rise-to-threshold process, may be simply explained by the effect of the decision rule employed.

SUBMITTER: Biscione V

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4630306 | biostudies-literature | 2015

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Investigating decision rules with a new experimental design: the EXACT paradigm.

Biscione Valerio V Harris Christopher M CM

Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience 20151103

In the decision-making field, it is important to distinguish between the perceptual process (how information is collected) and the decision rule (the strategy governing decision-making). We propose a new paradigm, called EXogenous ACcumulation Task (EXACT) to disentangle these two components. The paradigm consists of showing a horizontal gauge that represents the probability of receiving a reward at time t and increases with time. The participant is asked to press a button when they want to requ ...[more]

PMID: 26578916

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: The CRISPR/Cas9 toolbox has recently been expanded to include approaches for modulating gene expression. To successfully build on this work, and apply it for answering biological questions, it is important to establish it in a broad range of circumstances. Genome-scale CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) has been used in human cells lines, however the rules for designing effective guide RNAs (gRNAs) in different organisms are not well known. We sought to determine rules that determine gRNA effectiveness at transcriptional repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Results: We created an inducible single plasmid CRISPRi system for gene repression in yeast, and used it to analyze fitness effects of gRNAs under 18 small molecule treatments. Our approach correctly identified previously-described chemical-genetic interactions, as well as a new mechanism of suppressing fluconazole toxicity by repression of the ERG25 gene. Assessment of multiple target loci across treatments allowed us to determine generalizable features associated with gRNA efficacy. Guides that target regions with low nucleosome occupancy and high chromatin accessibility were clearly more effective. We also found the best region to target gRNAs was between the transcription start site (TSS) and 200bp upstream of the TSS. Finally, unlike nuclease-proficient Cas9 in human cells, point mutations were tolerated equally well by truncated (18 nt specificity sequence) and full length (20 nt) gRNAs, however, 18 nt gRNAs were generally less potent than full length gRNAs. Conclusions: Our results establish a powerful functional genomics screening method, provide rules for designing effective gRNAs for gene repression, and show that 18 nt and 20 nt gRNAs exhibit similar tolerance to mismatches in the target sequence. These findings will enable effective library design and genome-wide screening in many genetic backgrounds. An expression construct was created for inducible CRISPRi in yeast. Key features include ORFs expressing dCas9-Mxi1 and the tetracycline repressor (TetR), as well as a tetracycline inducible gRNA locus containing the RPR1 promoter with a TetO site, a NotI site for cloning new gRNA specificity sequences, and the constant part of the gRNA. When yeast containing this plasmid are grown in the absence of anhydrotetracycline (ATc) TetR binds the gRNA promoter and prevents PolIII from binding and transcribing the gRNA. This in turn prevents dCas9-Mxi1 from binding the target site. In the presence of ATc, TetR dissociates and gRNA is expressed, allowing dCas9-Mxi1 to bind its target locus, and repress gene expression. gRNA libraries were cloned into this construct and transformed into yeast to create pools. Experiments were conducted in which yeast pools were grown in inducing (+ATc) and non-inducing conditions (-ATc) in the presence of different drugs. After multiple generations of growth in these conditions, yeast plasmids were minipreped and the gRNA locus was PCRed and sequenced via MiSeq. Counts of each gRNA were compared in different conditions.

Project description:This study investigates if and under which conditions humans are able to identify and follow the most advantageous leader who will them provide with the most resources. In an iterated economic game with the aim of earning monetary reward, 150 participants were asked to repeatedly choose one out of four leaders. Unbeknownst to participants, the leaders were computer-controlled and programmed to yield different expected payout values that participants had to infer from repeated interaction over 30 rounds. Additionally, participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: single, independent, or cohesion. The conditions were designed to investigate the ideal circumstances that lead to identifying the most advantageous leader: when participants are alone (single condition), in a group that lets individuals sample information about leaders independently (independent condition), or in a group that is rewarded for cohesive behavior (cohesion condition). Our results show that participants are generally able to identify the most advantageous leader. However, participants who were incentivized to act cohesively in a group were more likely to settle on a less advantageous leader. This suggests that cohesion might have a detrimental effect on group decision making. To test the validity of this finding, we explore possible explanations for this pattern, such as the length of exploration and exploitation phases, and present techniques to check for confounding factors in group experiments in order to identify or exclude them as alternative explanations. Finally, we show that the chosen reward structure of the game strongly affects the observed following behavior in the group and possibly occludes other effects. We conclude with a recommendation to carefully choose reward structures and evaluate possible alternative explanations in experimental group research that should further pursue the study of exploration/exploitation phases and the influence of group cohesion on group decision making as promising topics for further research.

Dataset Information

Investigating decision rules with a new experimental design: the EXACT paradigm.

Publications

Investigating decision rules with a new experimental design: the EXACT paradigm.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets