Rationale and development of image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy post-prostatectomy: the present standard of care?
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Murray JR
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4646477 | biostudies-literature | 2015
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Rationale and development of image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy post-prostatectomy: the present standard of care?
Murray Julia R JR McNair Helen A HA Dearnaley David P DP
Cancer management and research 20151111
The indications for post-prostatectomy radiotherapy have evolved over the last decade, although the optimal timing, dose, and target volume remain to be well defined. The target volume is susceptible to anatomical variations with its borders interfacing with the rectum and bladder. Image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy has become the gold standard for radical prostate radiotherapy. Here we review the current evidence for image-guided techniques with intensity-modulated radiotherapy to th ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:The optimal field size of salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for biochemical recurrence, particularly for patients with high-risk prostate cancer, remains undefined. This retrospective analysis was performed to investigate oncological outcomes as well as treatment-related toxicity following salvage intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to the whole pelvis and to compare the results with other studies implementing a small field size of the prostate bed.The medical records of 170 patients with high-risk prostate cancer who received SRT for biochemical recurrence following prostatectomy were reviewed. Whole-pelvic IMRT was administered with a median dose of 66 Gy in 30 fractions. To improve treatment accuracy, an endorectal balloon device and daily cone-beam computed tomography were utilized. Androgen-deprivation therapy combined with SRT was administered to 97 (57.1%) patients.Eventually, 68 (40.0%) patients showed biochemical progression (BCP) after SRT. With a median follow-up period of 56 months, the 5-year BCP-free survival was 38.6%. The overall and cause-specific survival rates were 90.9% and 96.7%, respectively. Regarding BCP-free survival analysis, pathological T stage, persistent prostate-specific antigen (PSA) elevation after prostatectomy, and preSRT PSA level were significant prognostic factors on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, pathological T stage and preSRT PSA value retained their significance. Acute and late grade-3 genitourinary toxicities were observed in one (0.6%) and five (2.9%) patients, respectively. One patient each developed acute and late grade-3 gastrointestinal toxicity.SRT to whole pelvis using IMRT and image guidance is as safe as SRT to the prostate bed, but its efficacy should be confirmed in ongoing randomized trials. PreSRT PSA was the only controllable prognostic factor, suggesting the benefit of early SRT.
| S-EPMC5761863 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAdvanced radiotherapy (RT) techniques allow normal tissue to be spared in patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS). This work aims to evaluate toxicity and outcome after neoadjuvant image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) as helical intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with reduced margins based on MRI-based target definition in patients with STS.MethodsBetween 2010 to 2014, 41 patients with extremity STS were treated with IGRT delivered as helical IMRT on a tomotherapy machine. The tumor site was in the upper extremity in 6 patients (15%) and lower extremity in 35 patients (85%). Reduced margins of 2.5?cm in longitudinal direction and 1.0?cm in axial direction were used to expand the MRI-defined gross tumor volume, including peritumoral edema, to the clinical target volume. An additional margin of 5?mm was added to receive the planning target volume. The full total dose of 50?Gy in 2?Gy fractions was sucessfully applied in 40 patients. Two patients received chemotherapy instead of surgery due to systemic progression. All patients were included into a strict follow-up program and were seen interdisciplinarily by the Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Radiation Oncology.ResultsThirty eight patients that received total RT total dose and subsequent resection were analyzed for outcome. After a median follow-up of 38.5?months cumulative OS, local PFS and systemic PFS at 2?years were determined at 78.2, 85.2 and 54.5%, respectively. Two of 6 local recurrences were proximal marginal misses. Negative resection margins were achieved in 84% of patients. The rate of major wound complications was comparable to previous IMRT studies with 36.8%. RT was overall tolerable with low toxicity rates.ConclusionsIMRT-IGRT offers neoadjuvant treatment for extremity STS with reduced safety margins and thus low toxicity rates. Wound complication rates were comparable to previously reported frequencies. Two reported marginal misses suggest a word of caution for reduction of longitudinal safety margins.
| S-EPMC6327451 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundImage-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) is increasingly being used to treat patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) of the head and neck. Although there is no comparison between IMRT and conventional radiation therapy (CRT) concerning their efficacy. In this analysis, we compared CRT and IMRT outcomes for head and neck STS.Patients and methodsSixty-seven patients who underwent radiotherapy between 1994 and 2017 were identified.ResultsThe median follow-up was 31 months. Of the 67 patients, 34% were treated with CRT technique and 66% with IG-IMRT. The locoregional relapse rate following IMRT was 21% versus 70% with CRT (p<0.001) and the 5-year locoregional control was 69% versus 28%, respectively (p=0.01). IG-IMRT was associated with non-significant, less acute, and chronic adverse events. In the multivariate analysis, a significant influence of radiation technique on locoregional control was confirmed (p=0.04).ConclusionIG-IMRT seems to be associated both with higher locoregional control as well as lower acute and chronic toxicities.
| S-EPMC6689378 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo report acute hematological toxicity (HT) in patients receiving post-operative bowel sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and cisplatin and its dosimetric predictors.MethodsClinical database of Phase III trial (NCT01279135), that randomized patients to post-operative conformal or intensity modulated radiation therapy, was searched to select patient strata that received bowel sparing IMRT (50 Gy/25#/5 wks) and concurrent cisplatin (40 mg m-2). Pelvic bone marrow (BM) was retrospectively delineated in two sets: whole bone (WB), and freehand (FH) inner cavity of bone. Dose volume histograms (DVH) of BM were obtained. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve identified DVH thresholds that predicted for Grade≥ II HT with highest specificity. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed.ResultsOverall 75 patients received concurrent cisplatin. Grades I-V HT was observed in 38.7%, 42.7%, 14.7%, 0%, and 0% patients, respectively. Grade ≥ II leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were observed in 26%, 40%, 26.5%, and 1.4% respectively. None of the HT resulted in treatment break. On univariate analysis, whole pelvis+ lumbar FH V30 >55% & V40>35%, whole pelvis WB and FH V40 > 35%, and lower pelvis WB and FH V40 >20% correlated for Grade ≥ II leucopenia and neutropenia. None of the BM dose volume constraints predicted for overall HT or neutropenia on multivariate analysis.ConclusionThe IMRT arm of NCT01279135 (PARCER study) that employed strict bowel constraints had unintentional but desirable BM sparing. None of the BM subvolume DVH parameters could be validated on multivariate analysis.Advances in knowledgeThe prospective study reports feasibility of bone marrow sparing with bowel sparing post-operative pelvic IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy for cervical cancer. The present study reports low incidence of hematological and gastrointestinal toxicity during post-operative chemoradiation with IMRT. As both whole bone and freehand pelvis BM contours predicted for HT, hence an easier method of whole bone contouring should continue to be used till further validation of more specific BM subvolumes becomes available. The study results highlight the need for further research into dose volume constraints during post-operative IMRT.
| S-EPMC6319830 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Gliomas represent a broad spectrum of disease with life-expectancy outcomes ranging from months to decades. As our understanding of the molecular profiles of gliomas expands rapidly, practitioners are now better able to identify patients with favorable versus nonfavorable prognoses. Radiation therapy plays a key role in glioma treatment, improving disease control and oftentimes survival. However, for survivors, either long-term or short-term, radiation-induced cognitive impairments may negatively impact their quality of life. For patients with both favorable and unfavorable prognoses, intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) may offer significant, yet unproven benefits. IMPT is the newest and most advanced proton delivery technique, one with substantial benefits compared with historical proton techniques. IMPT allows practitioners to maximize the physical benefits of protons, increasing normal tissue sparing and reducing the potential for adverse effects. For more aggressive tumors, the dose conformality and normal tissue sparing afforded by IMPT may also allow for dose escalation to target volumes. However, in order to truly maximize the clinical potential of IMPT, the field of radiation oncology must not only implement the most advanced technologies, but also understand and capitalize on the unique biologic aspects of proton therapy.
| S-EPMC5463497 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and purposeImage-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) improves treatment set-up accuracy and provides the opportunity to reduce target volume margins. We introduced IGRT methods using standard (IGRT-S) or reduced (IGRT-R) margins in a randomised phase 2 substudy within CHHiP trial. We present a pre-planned analysis of the impact of IGRT on dosimetry and acute/late pelvic side effects using gastrointestinal and genitourinary clinician and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and evaluate efficacy.Materials and methodsCHHiP is a randomised phase 3, non-inferiority trial for men with localised prostate cancer. 3216 patients were randomly assigned to conventional (74?Gy in 2?Gy/fraction (f) daily) or moderate hypofractionation (60 or 57?Gy in 3?Gy/f daily) between October 2002 and June 2011. The IGRT substudy included a second randomisation assigning to no-IGRT, IGRT-S (standard CTV-PTV margins), or IGRT-R (reduced CTV-PTV margins). Primary substudy endpoint was late RTOG bowel and urinary toxicity at 2?years post-radiotherapy.ResultsBetween June 2010 to July 2011, 293 men were recruited from 16 centres. Median follow-up is 56.9(IQR 54.3-60.9)?months. Rectal and bladder dose-volume and surface percentages were significantly lower in IGRT-R compared to IGRT-S group; (p?<?0.0001). Cumulative proportion with RTOG grade???2 toxicity reported to 2?years for bowel was 8.3(95% CI 3.2-20.7)%, 8.3(4.7-14.6)% and 5.8(2.6-12.4)% and for urinary 8.4(3.2-20.8)%, 4.6(2.1-9.9)% and 3.9(1.5-9.9)% in no IGRT, IGRT-S and IGRT-R groups respectively. In an exploratory analysis, treatment efficacy appeared similar in all three groups.ConclusionIntroduction of IGRT was feasible in a national randomised trial and IGRT-R produced dosimetric benefits. Overall side effect profiles were acceptable in all groups but lowest with IGRT and reduced margins.Isrctn97182923.
| S-EPMC7005673 | biostudies-literature
Project description:OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in breast cancer and to compare it with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) as conventional tangential field radiotheraphy (conTFRT). METHODS: 12 patients (Stage I, 8: 6 left breast cancer and 2 right breast cancer; Stage II, 4: 2 on each side). Three plans were calculated for each case after breast-conserving surgery. Breast was treated with 50 Gy in four patients with supraclavicular lymph node inclusion, and in eight patients without the node inclusion. Multiple indices and dose parameters were measured. RESULTS: V95% was not achieved by any modality. Heterogeneity index: 0.16 (VMAT), 0.13 [intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)] and 0.14 (conTFRT). Conformity index: 1.06 (VMAT), 1.15 (IMRT) and 1.69 (conTFRT). For both indices, IMRT was more effective than VMAT (p=0.009, p=0.002). Dmean and V20 for ipsilateral lung were lower for IMRT than VMAT (p=0.0001, p=0.003). Dmean, V2 and V5 of contralateral lung were lower for IMRT than VMAT (p>0.0001, p=0.005). Mean dose and V5 to the heart were lower for IMRT than for VMAT (p=0.015, p=0.002). CONCLUSION: The hypothesis of equivalence of VMAT to IMRT was not confirmed for planning target volume parameter or dose distribution to organs at risk. VMAT was inferior to IMRT and 3D-CRT with regard to dose distribution to organs at risk, especially at the low dose level. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: New technology VMAT is not superior to IMRT or conventional radiotherapy in breast cancer in any aspect.
| S-EPMC3856548 | biostudies-other
Project description:PURPOSE:This study reported long-term outcomes of patients with cervical cancer who were treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy and 3-dimensional (3D) image-guided adapted brachytherapy (IMRT/3D-IGABT) compared with those treated with 2-dimensional (2D) external irradiation and 2D brachytherapy (2D EBRT/BT). METHODS AND MATERIALS:This study included patients with newly diagnosed cervical cancer and pretreatment fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans who were treated with curative-intent irradiation from 1997 to 2013. The treatment policy changed from using 2D EBRT/BT to IMRT/3D-IGABT in 2005. Patterns of recurrence, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Late gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity were scored with National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. RESULTS:The median follow-up for patients alive at the time of last follow-up in the 2D EBRT/BT group (n = 300) was 15.3 years (range, 10.8-20.5 years). In the IMRT/3D-IGABT group (n = 300), it was 7 years (range, 5-12.4 years). According to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 33% of tumors were stage IB1 to IB2, 41% were stage IIA to IIB, and 26% were stage IIIA to IVA. The results after 5 years for patients treated with 2D EBRT/BT showed that freedom from relapse (FFR) was 57%, CSS was 62%, and OS was 57%. For the IMRT/3D-IGABT group, the 5-year results showed that FFR was 65% (P = .04), CSS was 69% (P = .01), and OS was 61% (P = .04). When stratified by lymph node status according to positron emission tomography scan results, disease control was most improved with IMRT/3D-IGABT versus 2D EBRT/BT in patients with positive pelvic lymph nodes only (P = .02). Cumulatively, 88 of 600 patients (15%) had grade ?3 late bowel/bladder toxicity. The 2D EBRT/BT group had 55 patients (18%), and the IMRT/3D-IGABT group had 33 patients (11%; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS:IMRT/3D-IGABT was associated with improved survival and decreased gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity in patients with cervical cancer compared with those who received 2D EBRT/BT.
| S-EPMC7065668 | biostudies-literature
Project description:To compare the outcome of low-dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) and image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) for localized prostate cancer, we examined 488 LDR-BT and 269 IG-IMRT patients. IG-IMRT treated older and advanced disease with more hormonal therapy than LDR-BT, which excluded T3b-T4 tumor and initial PSA?>?50?ng/ml. The actuarial five-year biochemical failure-free survival rate was 88.7% and 96.7% (p?=?0.0003) in IG-IMRT and LDR-BT, respectively; it was 88.2% (85.1% for IG-IMRT and 94.9% for LDR-BT, p?=?0.0578) for the high-risk group, 95.2% (91.6% and 97.0%, p?=?0.3361) for the intermediate IG-IMRT and 96.8% (95.7% and 97%, p?=?0.8625) for the low-risk group. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) involving propensity scores was used to reduce background selection bias. IPTW showed a statistically significant difference between LDR-BT and IG-IMRT in high risk (p?=?0.0009) and high risk excluding T3-4/initial PSA?>?50?ng/ml group (p?=?0.0073). IG-IMRT showed more gastrointestinal toxicity (p?=?0.0023) and less genitourinary toxicity (p?<?0.0001) than LDR-BT. LDR-BT and IG-IMRT showed equivocal outcome in low- and intermediate-risk groups. For selected high-risk patients, LDR-BT showed more potential to improve PSA control rate than IG-IMRT.
| S-EPMC6043516 | biostudies-other
Project description:Purpose:Dose-volume histogram (DVH) toxicity relationships are poorly defined in men who receive radiation after radical prostatectomy (RP). We evaluated Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) study 0534 and institutional intact normal-tissue sparing guidelines, as well as dose to bladder trigone, for ability to minimize late toxicity. Methods and materials:164 men received intensity modulated radiation therapy (RT) to a median prostate bed dose of 66.6?Gy at a median of 22 months after RP. 46% of men were prescribed androgen deprivation therapy and pelvic lymph node irradiation to a median dose of 50.4?Gy. DVH relationships for the rectum, bladder, trigone, and bladder excluding the clinical target volume (bladder-CTV) were analyzed against the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events late grade 2?+?(G2+) gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity by log-rank test. RTOG 0534 (rectum V65, 40 Gy ?35, 55%, and bladder-CTV V65, 40 ?50, 70%) and intact prostate RT institutional guidelines (rectum V70, 65, 40 ?20, 40, 80% and bladder V70, 65, 40 ?30, 60, 80%, respectively) guidelines were evaluated. Results:With a median follow-up time of of 33 months, the 4-year freedom from G2?+?GI and GU toxicity were both 91%. G2?+?GI (n?=?12) and GU (n?=?15) toxicity included 4% diarrhea (n?=?6), 4% hemorrhage (n?=?6), 1% proctitis (n?=?1), and 4% urinary frequency (n?=?7), 1% obstructive (n?=?2), 2% cystitis (n?=?3), and 3% incontinence (n?=?5), respectively. RTOG 0534 rectum and bladder goals were not achieved in 65% and 41% of cases, while the institutional intact prostate goals were not achieved in 21% and 25% of cases, respectively. Neither dose to the bladder trigone nor any of the proposed normal tissue goals were associated with late toxicity (P?>?.1). In the univariate analysis, age, pelvic RT, RT dose, anticoagulation use, androgen deprivation therapy, time from RP to RT, and tobacco history were not associated with toxicity. Conclusions:More than 90% of men were free from late G2?+?toxicity 4 years after post-RP intensity modulated RT. No tested parameters were associated with late toxicity. In the absence of established normal-tissue DVH guidelines in the postoperative setting, the use of intact guidelines is reasonable.
| S-EPMC6128032 | biostudies-literature