Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Stomach cancer and occupational exposure to asbestos: a meta-analysis of occupational cohort studies.


ABSTRACT:

Background

A recent Monographs Working Group of the International Agency for Research on Cancer concluded that there is limited evidence for a causal association between exposure to asbestos and stomach cancer.

Methods

We performed a meta-analysis to quantitatively evaluate this association. Random effects models were used to summarise the relative risks across studies. Sources of heterogeneity were explored through subgroup analyses and meta-regression.

Results

We identified 40 mortality cohort studies from 37 separate papers, and cancer incidence data were extracted for 15 separate cohorts from 14 papers. The overall meta-SMR for stomach cancer for total cohort was 1.15 (95% confidence interval 1.03-1.27), with heterogeneous results across studies. Statistically significant excesses were observed in North America and Australia but not in Europe, and for generic asbestos workers and insulators. Meta-SMRs were larger for cohorts reporting a SMR for lung cancer above 2 and cohort sizes below 1000.

Conclusions

Our results support the conclusion by IARC that exposure to asbestos is associated with a moderate increased risk of stomach cancer.

SUBMITTER: Fortunato L 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4647249 | biostudies-literature | 2015 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Stomach cancer and occupational exposure to asbestos: a meta-analysis of occupational cohort studies.

Fortunato L L   Rushton L L  

British journal of cancer 20150430 11


<h4>Background</h4>A recent Monographs Working Group of the International Agency for Research on Cancer concluded that there is limited evidence for a causal association between exposure to asbestos and stomach cancer.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a meta-analysis to quantitatively evaluate this association. Random effects models were used to summarise the relative risks across studies. Sources of heterogeneity were explored through subgroup analyses and meta-regression.<h4>Results</h4>We identifi  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8062011 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5610800 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4654666 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6427112 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4865877 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6370155 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4934017 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8305339 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3773512 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3927979 | biostudies-literature