Dataset Information

Oral dabigatran etexilate versus enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prevention after total hip arthroplasty: pooled analysis of two phase 3 randomized trials.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Two phase 3 trials compared 28-35 days of treatment with oral dabigatran 220 mg or 150 mg (RE-NOVATE) or 220 mg (RE-NOVATE II) once daily with subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg once daily for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after elective total hip arthroplasty. METHODS:This prespecified pooled analysis compared the outcomes for the dabigatran 220 mg dose with enoxaparin, which included 4,374 patients. Total VTE (venographic and symptomatic) plus all-cause mortality (primary efficacy), major VTE (proximal deep vein thrombosis [DVT] or non-fatal pulmonary embolism) plus VTE-related death, and bleeding events were evaluated. Efficacy analysis was based on the modified intention-to-treat (ITT) population and safety analysis was based on all treated patients. The common risk difference (RD) for dabigatran versus enoxaparin was estimated using a fixed effects model. RESULTS:Total VTE and all-cause mortality occurred in 6.8 % (114/1,672) and 7.7 % (129/1,682) (RD:-0.8 %, 95 % confidence interval [CI] -2.6 to 0.9) for dabigatran and enoxaparin, respectively. Major VTE plus VTE-related mortality occurred in 2.7 % (46/1,714) and 4.0 % (69/1,711) (RD: -1.4 %, 95 % CI -2.6 to -0.2) of patients receiving dabigatran 220 mg and enoxaparin, respectively. Major bleeding occurred in 1.7 % (37/2,156) and 1.3 % (27/2,157) (RD: 0.5 %, 95 % CI -0.2 to 1.2), for dabigatran and enoxaparin respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Extended prophylaxis with oral dabigatran 220 mg once daily was as effective as enoxaparin 40 mg once daily in reducing the risk of total VTE and all-cause mortality after total hip arthroplasty, with a similar bleeding profile. The clinically relevant outcome of major VTE and VTE-related death was significantly reduced with dabigatran versus enoxaparin. TRIAL REGISTRATION:NCT00657150 and NCT00168818.

SUBMITTER: Eriksson BI

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4647514 | biostudies-literature | 2015

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Oral dabigatran etexilate versus enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prevention after total hip arthroplasty: pooled analysis of two phase 3 randomized trials.

Eriksson Bengt I BI Dahl Ola E OE Rosencher Nadia N Clemens Andreas A Hantel Stefan S Feuring Martin M Kreuzer Jörg J Huo Michael M Friedman Richard J RJ

Thrombosis journal 20151117

<h4>Background</h4>Two phase 3 trials compared 28-35 days of treatment with oral dabigatran 220 mg or 150 mg (RE-NOVATE) or 220 mg (RE-NOVATE II) once daily with subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg once daily for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after elective total hip arthroplasty.<h4>Methods</h4>This prespecified pooled analysis compared the outcomes for the dabigatran 220 mg dose with enoxaparin, which included 4,374 patients. Total VTE (venographic and symptomatic) plus all-cause mortal ...[more]

PMID: 26578849

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe objective of this analysis was to assess the effects of edoxaban compared with enoxaparin on key coagulation biomarkers and present pooled primary efficacy and safety results from phase 3 STARS E-3 and STARS J-V trials for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA).MethodsIn the randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, STARS E-3 and STARS J-V trials, patients received edoxaban 30 mg or enoxaparin 2000 IU (20 mg) twice daily for 11 to 14 days. The studies were conducted in Japan and Taiwan; enoxaparin dosing was based on Japanese label recommendations. The primary efficacy endpoint was incidence of VTE; the safety endpoint was major or clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM) bleeding. Blood samples were taken at presurgical evaluation, pretreatment (postsurgery), predose on day 7, predose on completion of treatment, and at a follow-up examination 25 to 35 days after the last dose of study drug for D-dimer, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1+2), and soluble fibrin monomer complex (SFMC) measurement.ResultsA total of 716 patients enrolled in STARS E-3 and 610 patients enrolled in STARS J-V; 1326 patients overall. This analysis included 657 patients who received edoxaban 30 mg QD and 650 patients who received enoxaparin 20 mg BID. Incidence of VTE was 5.1 and 10.7% for edoxaban and enoxaparin, respectively (P <0.001). Incidence of combined major and CRNM bleeding was 4.6 and 3.7% for edoxaban and enoxaparin, respectively (P = 0.427). On day 7, mean D-dimer (4.4 vs 5.5 μg/mL), F1+2 (363 vs 463 pmol/L), and SFMC (5.7 vs 6.8 μg/mL) were lower in edoxaban-treated patients relative to enoxaparin-treated patients, respectively (P <0.0001 for all). At end of treatment, mean D-dimer (5.4 vs 6.2 μg/mL), F1+2 (292 vs 380 pmol/L), and SFMC (6.2 vs 7.2 μg/mL) were lower in edoxaban-treated patients relative to enoxaparin-treated patients (P <0.0001 for all).ConclusionsEdoxaban was superior to enoxaparin in prevention of VTE following TKA and THA, with comparable rates of bleeding events. Relative to enoxaparin, edoxaban significantly reduced D-dimer, F1+2, and SFMC.Trial registrationClintrials.gov NCT01181102 and NCT01181167. Both registered 8/12/2010.

Project description:Dabigatran etexilate is an oral, reversible, direct thrombin inhibitor licensed for the prevention of venous thromboembolism and stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether, and to what extent, a switch from enoxparin to dabigatran etexilate affects the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters and safety profile of dabigatran.Enoxaparin 40 mg was administered subcutaneously once daily for 3 days followed by a single dose of dabigatran etexilate 220 mg (test treatment) on day 4 in an open-label, two-way cross-over trial in healthy volunteers. Dabigatran plasma levels were measured using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method. Anticoagulant activity was measured using a number of clotting tests, including prothrombinase-induced clotting time (PiCT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), ecarin clotting time (ECT), and diluted thrombin time (dTT).PK, PD, and safety data were available for 23 subjects for each treatment. The adjusted geometric mean test/reference ratio of area under the concentration-time curve for total dabigatran was 84% (90% confidence interval 67.2-105.0%) and 86% (67.0-110.0%) for maximum plasma concentration. The PiCT test/reference ratio, which represents the activity of enoxaparin and dabigatran, was elevated by approximately 15% for peak maximum effect ratio to baseline and total area under the effect curve (AUEC????) activity, suggesting that some anticoagulant activity of enoxaparin was still present. Enoxaparin pre-treatment increased the AUEC???? of activated partial thromboplastin time by approximately 14%. All other dabigatran-related PD markers were unaffected. Tolerability was good, with only mild and reversible adverse events during the treatment.Prior administration of enoxaparin did not meaningfully affect the PK or PD properties of dabigatran, and the switch from enoxaparin to dabigatran etexilate was well tolerated among the study subjects. These data support the safety of switching patients from enoxaparin to dabigatran etexilate.

Dataset Information

Oral dabigatran etexilate versus enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prevention after total hip arthroplasty: pooled analysis of two phase 3 randomized trials.

Publications

Oral dabigatran etexilate versus enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prevention after total hip arthroplasty: pooled analysis of two phase 3 randomized trials.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets