Dataset Information

Novel risk scores for survival and intracranial failure in patients treated with radiosurgery alone to melanoma brain metastases.

ABSTRACT: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone is an increasingly common treatment strategy for brain metastases. However, existing prognostic tools for overall survival (OS) were developed using cohorts of patients treated predominantly with approaches other than SRS alone. Therefore, we devised novel risk scores for OS and distant brain failure (DF) for melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treated with SRS alone.We retrospectively reviewed 86 patients treated with SRS alone for MBM from 2009-2014. OS and DF were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards modeling identified clinical risk factors. Risk scores were created based on weighted regression coefficients. OS scores range from 0-10 (0 representing best OS), and DF risk scores range from 0-5 (0 representing lowest risk of DF). Predictive power was evaluated using c-index statistics. Bootstrapping with 200 resamples tested model stability.The median OS was 8.1 months from SRS, and 54 (70.1 %) patients had DF at a median of 3.3 months. Risk scores for OS were predicated on performance status, extracranial disease (ED) status, number of lesions, and gender. Median OS for the low-risk group (0-3 points) was not reached. For the moderate-risk (4-6 points) and high-risk (6.5-10) groups, median OS was 7.6 months and 2.4 months, respectively (p?

SUBMITTER: Chowdhury IH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4666036 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Novel risk scores for survival and intracranial failure in patients treated with radiosurgery alone to melanoma brain metastases.

Chowdhury Imran H IH Ojerholm Eric E McMillan Matthew T MT Miller Denise D Kolker James D JD Kurtz Goldie G Dorsey Jay F JF Nagda Suneel N SN Geiger Geoffrey A GA Brem Steven S O'Rourke Donald M DM Zager Eric L EL Gangadhar Tara T Schuchter Lynn L Lee John Y K JY Alonso-Basanta Michelle M

Radiation oncology (London, England) 20151201

<h4>Purpose</h4>Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone is an increasingly common treatment strategy for brain metastases. However, existing prognostic tools for overall survival (OS) were developed using cohorts of patients treated predominantly with approaches other than SRS alone. Therefore, we devised novel risk scores for OS and distant brain failure (DF) for melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treated with SRS alone.<h4>Methods and materials</h4>We retrospectively reviewed 86 patients treated wi ...[more]

PMID: 26626714

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose:Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in combination with immunotherapy (IMT) or targeted therapy is increasingly being used in the setting of melanoma brain metastases (MBMs). The synergistic properties of combination therapy are not well understood. We compared the distant intracranial failure rates of intact MBMs treated with SRS, SRS?+?IMT, and SRS?+?targeted therapy. Methods and materials:Combination therapy was defined as delivery of SRS within 3 months of IMT (anti-CTLA-4 /anti-PD-1 therapy) or targeted therapy (BRAF/MEK inhibitors). The primary endpoint was distant intracranial failure after SRS, which was defined as any new MBM identified on brain magnetic resonance imaging. Outcomes were evaluated using the Kaplan Meier method and Cox proportional hazards. Results:A total of 72 patients with melanoma with 233 MBMs were treated between April 2006 and April 2016. The number of MBMs within each treatment group was as follows: SRS: 121; SRS?+?IMT: 48; and SRS?+?targeted therapy: 64. The median follow-up was 8.9 months. One-year distant intracranial control rates for SRS, SRS?+?IMT, and SRS?+?targeted therapy were 11.5%, 60%, and 10%, respectively (P?<?.001). On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for steroid use and number of MBMs, SRS?+?IMT remained associated with a significant reduction in distant intracranial failure compared with SRS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.80; P?=?.003) and compared with SRS?+?targeted therapy (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.25-0.68; P?=?.001).One-year local control for SRS, SRS?+?IMT, and SRS?+?targeted therapy was 66%, 85%, and 72%, respectively (P?=?.044). On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for dose, SRS?+?IMT remained associated with a significant reduction in local failure compared with SRS alone (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.14-0.95; P?=?.04). Conclusions:SRS with immunotherapy is associated with decreased distant and local intracranial failure compared with SRS alone. Prospective studies are warranted to validate this result.

Project description:BackgroundThe benefits of adding upfront whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) to surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) when compared to surgery or SRS alone for treatment of brain metastases are unclear.ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy and safety of surgery or SRS plus WBRT with that of surgery or SRS alone for treatment of brain metastases in patients with systemic cancer.Search methodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to May 2013 and annual meeting proceedings of ASCO and ASTRO up to September 2012 for relevant studies.Selection criteriaRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surgery or SRS plus WBRT with surgery or SRS alone for treatment of brain metastases.Data collection and analysisTwo review authors undertook the quality assessment and data extraction. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes include progression free survival (PFS), local and distant intracranial disease progression, neurocognitive function (NF), health related quality of life (HRQL) and neurological adverse events. Hazard ratios (HR), risk ratio (RR), confidence intervals (CI), P-values (P) were estimated with random effects models using Revman 5.1 MAIN RESULTS: We identified five RCTs including 663 patients with one to four brain metastases. The risk of bias associated with lack of blinding was high and impacted to a greater or lesser extent on the quality of evidence for all of the outcomes. Adding upfront WBRT decreased the relative risk of any intracranial disease progression at one year by 53% (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.66, P value < 0.0001, I(2) =34%, Chi(2) P value = 0.21, low quality evidence) but there was no clear evidence of a difference in OS (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.48, P value = 0.47, I(2) = 52%, Chi(2) P value = 0.08, low quality evidence) and PFS (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.10, P value = 0.14, I(2) = 16%, Chi(2) P value = 0.28, low quality evidence). Subgroup analyses showed that the effects on overall survival were similar regardless of types of focal therapy used, number of brain metastases, dose and sequence of WBRT. The evaluation of the impact of upfront WBRT on NF, HRQL and neurological adverse events was limited by the unclear and high risk of reporting, performance and detection bias, and inconsistency in the instruments and methods used to measure and report results across studies.Authors' conclusionsThere is low quality evidence that adding upfront WBRT to surgery or SRS decreases any intracranial disease progression at one year. There was no clear evidence of an effect on overall and progression free survival. The impact of upfront WBRT on neurocognitive function, health related quality of life and neurological adverse events was undetermined due to the high risk of performance and detection bias, and inconsistency in the instruments and methods used to measure and report results across studies.

Project description:Abstract Background Brain metastases (BM) are the most frequent neoplasm in the central nervous system (CNS) and primary tumors frequently involved are melanoma, lung cancer and breast cancer. CNS localisation is associated with poor prognosis, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) represents a treatment option for patients with a good performance status. Glutamate (Glu) is a neurotransmitter which plays a facilitating role in carcinogenesis and progression of malignant tumors, as well as in excitotoxicity. Glu efflux from the brain is regulated by scavengers glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT), glutamate-pyruvate transaminase (GPT) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), with aspartate and lactate as catabolites. Glu efflux from the brain seems to be impaired in advanced-stage cancers, resulting in increased blood Glu levels where scavengers exert a protective role. Our hypothesis is that serum Glu and scavengers’ levels are related to neuroinvasion and treatment response in patients with BM and may represent potential biomarkers for BM course and prognosis. Material and Methods Serum Glu scavengers (GOT1, GPT and LDH), serum Glu, aspartate and lactate levels are collected in included patients treated and grouped in A) BM group of patients affected by BM from lung or breast cancer or melanoma, treated with SRS; B) Control-1 group of patients affected by lung cancer, breast cancer or melanoma but without BM and C) Control-2 group of patients with benign intracranial lesions (meningiomas, acoustic schwannomas) treated with SRS.In A) and C) serum metabolites and scavengers will be analyzed before and after SRS treatment (at 3, 6, 9 months) while in B) analyzed once. Blood levels in A) and C) help in identifying differences related to malignancy, the role of SRS and the association with disease control, while blood levels in A) and B) help in detecting differences related to BMs. Exclusion criteria are surgical or previous radiosurgical treatment for BM. This study has received Institutional Ethical Committee approval on 3rd August 2020 (Project NCH04-2020, Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04785521). Preliminary results Comparison between BM group (n = 32) and Control-1 (n=18) revealed a significant difference in LDH (271.93 vs 217.56 U/L; p 0.041) and lactate (1.86 vs 1.34 mmol/L, p = 0.022) and a trend towards significance in glutamate (103.43 vs 73.74 µmol/L, p = 0.07). Comparison between BM group (n=32) and Control-2 (n = 37) revealed a difference in LDH (271.93 vs 210.89 U/L; p < 0.001), lactate (1.86 vs 1.24 mmol/L; p < 0.001), aspartate (16.36 vs 10.22 µmol/L, p 0.006) and glutamate levels (123 vs 103 µmol/L, p = 0.052). Conclusion The present study is the first one addressing serum glutamate and scavenger levels in patients with BM. If the hypothesis will be confirmed, new targets in glutamate signalling pathway could be identified to define new therapeutic strategies in this challenging disease.

Project description:ImportanceClinical trials for metastatic malignant neoplasms are increasingly being extended to patients with brain metastases. Despite the preeminence of progression-free survival (PFS) as a primary oncologic end point, the correlation of intracranial progression (ICP) and extracranial progression (ECP) events with overall survival (OS) is poorly understood for patients with brain metastases following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).ObjectiveTo determine the correlation of ICP and ECP with OS among patients with brain metastases completing an initial SRS course.Design, setting, and participantsThis multi-institutional retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020. We included patients who completed an initial course of SRS for brain metastases during the study period, including receipt of single and/or multifraction SRS, prior whole-brain radiotherapy, and brain metastasis resection. Data analysis was performed on November 15, 2022.ExposuresNon-OS end points included intracranial PFS, extracranial PFS, PFS, time to ICP, time to ECP, and any time to progression. Progression events were radiologically defined, incorporating multidisciplinary clinical consensus.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was correlation of surrogate end points to OS. Clinical end points were estimated from time of SRS completion via the Kaplan-Meier method, while end-point correlation to OS was measured using normal scores rank correlation with the iterative multiple imputation approach.ResultsThis study included 1383 patients, with a mean age of 63.1 years (range, 20.9-92.8 years) and a median follow-up of 8.72 months (IQR, 3.25-19.68 months). The majority of participants were White (1032 [75%]), and more than half (758 [55%]) were women. Common primary tumor sites included the lung (757 [55%]), breast (203 [15%]), and skin (melanoma; 100 [7%]). Intracranial progression was observed in 698 patients (50%), preceding 492 of 1000 observed deaths (49%). Extracranial progression was observed in 800 patients (58%), preceding 627 of 1000 observed deaths (63%). Irrespective of deaths, 482 patients (35%) experienced both ICP and ECP, 534 (39%) experienced ICP (216 [16%]) or ECP (318 [23%]), and 367 (27%) experienced neither. The median OS was 9.93 months (95% CI, 9.08-11.05 months). Intracranial PFS had the highest correlation with OS (ρ = 0.84 [95% CI, 0.82-0.85]; median, 4.39 months [95% CI, 4.02-4.92 months]). Time to ICP had the lowest correlation with OS (ρ = 0.42 [95% CI, 0.34-0.50]) and the longest median time to event (median, 8.76 months [95% CI, 7.70-9.48 months]). Across specific primary tumor types, correlations of intracranial PFS and extracranial PFS with OS were consistently high despite corresponding differences in median outcome durations.Conclusions and relevanceThe results of this cohort study of patients with brain metastases completing SRS suggest that intracranial PFS, extracranial PFS, and PFS had the highest correlations with OS and time to ICP had the lowest correlation with OS. These data may inform future patient inclusion and end-point selection for clinical trials.

Dataset Information

Novel risk scores for survival and intracranial failure in patients treated with radiosurgery alone to melanoma brain metastases.

Publications

Novel risk scores for survival and intracranial failure in patients treated with radiosurgery alone to melanoma brain metastases.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets