Dataset Information

A Randomised Controlled Trial to Reduce Sedentary Time in Young Adults at Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Project STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes).

ABSTRACT:

Aims

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), a serious and prevalent chronic disease, is traditionally associated with older age. However, due to the rising rates of obesity and sedentary lifestyles, it is increasingly being diagnosed in the younger population. Sedentary (sitting) behaviour has been shown to be associated with greater risk of cardio-metabolic health outcomes, including T2DM. Little is known about effective interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour in younger adults at risk of T2DM. We aimed to investigate, through a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design, whether a group-based structured education workshop focused on sitting reduction, with self-monitoring, reduced sitting time.

Methods

Adults aged 18-40 years who were either overweight (with an additional risk factor for T2DM) or obese were recruited for the Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes (STAND) RCT. The intervention programme comprised of a 3-hour group-based structured education workshop, use of a self-monitoring tool, and follow-up motivational phone call. Data were collected at three time points: baseline, 3 and 12 months after baseline. The primary outcome measure was accelerometer-assessed sedentary behaviour after 12 months. Secondary outcomes included other objective (activPAL) and self-reported measures of sedentary behaviour and physical activity, and biochemical, anthropometric, and psycho-social variables.

Results

187 individuals (69% female; mean age 33 years; mean BMI 35 kg/m2) were randomised to intervention and control groups. 12 month data, when analysed using intention-to-treat analysis (ITT) and per-protocol analyses, showed no significant difference in the primary outcome variable, nor in the majority of the secondary outcome measures.

Conclusions

A structured education intervention designed to reduce sitting in young adults at risk of T2DM was not successful in changing behaviour at 12 months. Lack of change may be due to the brief nature of such an intervention and lack of focus on environmental change. Moreover, some participants reported a focus on physical activity rather than reductions in sitting per se. The habitual nature of sedentary behaviour means that behaviour change is challenging.

Trial registration

Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN08434554.

SUBMITTER: Biddle SJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4666612 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesTo test the efficacy of a multicomponent technology intervention for reducing daily sedentary time and improving cardiometabolic disease risk among sedentary, overweight university employees.DesignBlinded, randomised controlled trial.SettingA large south-eastern university in the USA.Participants49 middle-aged, primarily female, sedentary and overweight adults working in sedentary jobs enrolled in the study. A total of 40 participants completed the study.InterventionsParticipants were randomised to either: (1) an intervention group (N=23; 47.6+9.9 years; 94.1% female; 33.2+4.5 kg/m(2)); (2) or wait-list control group (N=17; 42.6+8.9 years; 86.9% female; 31.7+4.9 kg/m(2)). The intervention group received a theory-based, internet-delivered programme, a portable pedal machine at work and a pedometer for 12 weeks. The wait-list control group maintained their behaviours for 12 weeks.Outcome measuresPrimary (sedentary and physical activity behaviour measured objectively through StepWatch) and secondary (heart rate, blood pressure, height, weight, waist circumference, per cent body fat, cardiorespiratory fitness, fasting lipids) outcomes were measured at baseline and postintervention (12 weeks). Exploratory outcomes including intervention compliance and process evaluation measures were also assessed postintervention.ResultsCompared to controls, the intervention group reduced daily sedentary time (mean change (95%CI): -58.7 min/day (-118.4 to 0.99; p<0.01)) after adjusting for baseline values and monitor wear time. Intervention participants logged on to the website 71.3% of all intervention days, used the pedal machine 37.7% of all working intervention days and pedalled an average of 31.1 min/day.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that the intervention was engaging and resulted in reductions in daily sedentary time among full-time sedentary employees. These findings hold public health significance due to the growing number of sedentary jobs and the potential of these technologies in large-scale worksite programmes.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01371084.

Project description:Preclinical models of type 1 diabetes mellitus exhibit marked declines in skeletal muscle health including significant impairments in muscle repair. The present study investigated, for the first time, whether muscle repair was altered in young adults with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes (T1D) following damaging exercise.In this cohort study, eighteen physically-active young adults (M=22.1, SEM=0.9 years) with T1D (n, male/female=4/5; MHbA1c= 58, SEMHbA1c=5.9 mmol/mol) and without T1D (n, male/female=4/5) performed 300 unilateral eccentric contractions (90°s-1) of the knee extensors. Prior to exercise, at 48-hours and at 96-hours after exercise, participants gave a venous blood sample and vastus lateralis biopsy and performed a maximal voluntary isometric knee extension. Skeletal muscle extracellular matrix content, and satellite cell content/proliferation were assessed by immunofluorescence. Transmission electron microscopy was used to quantify ultrastructural damage.Maximal isometric strength was comparable between T1D and their sex-matched control group prior to exercise for both sexes. Immediately following damaging exercise, strength was decreased in both groups but there was a moderate effect size for lower strength during recovery in the T1D group at both 48-hours and 96-hours. Serum creatine kinase, an indicator of muscle damage, was moderately higher in T1D participants compared to controls at rest, and exhibited a small elevation 96-hours after exercise. Immunofluorescence analyses showed satellite cell content was lower at all timepoints in those with type 1 diabetes. T1D participants demonstrated a moderate delay in satellite cell proliferation (as assessed by Pax7+/Ki67+ nuclei counts) after exercise, reaching peak levels of proliferation 48-hours after control participants. Despite these differences, those with T1D did not exhibit greater ultrastructural muscle damage than controls as assessed by electron microscopy. Finally, a transcriptomic investigation of T1D muscle revealed several networks of dysregulated genes involving RNA translation as well as mitochondrial respiration function, providing potential explanations for previous observations of mitochondrial dysfunction in similar T1D cohorts. Our novel findings indicate that skeletal muscle from physically active, young adults with moderately controlled T1D may have a reduced ability to handle, and repair from, damaging exercise. While larger cohort studies are clearly needed, these results suggest that those with T1D may require longer recovery times following damaging exercise.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Prolonged daily sedentary time is associated with increased risk of cardiometabolic diseases, impaired physical function, and mortality. Older adults are more sedentary than any other age group and those in assisted living residences accumulate more sedentary time as they often have little need to engage in light-intensity or standing activities such as cleaning or meal preparation. This "low movement" environment can hasten functional decline. Thus, the purpose of this study was to develop a multi-level intervention to reduce and interrupt sedentary time within assisted living residences and conduct a pilot study to determine if the intervention is feasible and if further testing is warranted. METHODS:"Stand When You Can" (SWYC) was developed using a Social Ecological framework based on a review of literature and consultation with residents and staff at assisted living residences. After development, a six-week pilot study was conducted in two different residences with 10 older adults (82.2?±?8.7?years). Before and after the 6 weeks, ActivPAL™ inclinometers were used to measure daily movement behaviours and self-report questionnaires assessed time spent in different sedentary behaviours and quality of life. Physical function was assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery. Paired sample t-tests examined pre-post differences for pooled data and individual sites. At the end of the pilot study, feedback on the intervention was gathered from both residents and staff to examine feasibility. RESULTS:There was a trend towards a decrease in self-reported sitting time (142?min/day; p?=?0.09), although device-measured sedentary time did not change significantly. Participants with lower physical function at baseline showed clinically meaningful improvements in physical function after the 6?weeks (p?=?0.04, Cohen's d?=?0.89). There was no change in quality of life. Residents and staff reported that the intervention strategies were acceptable and practical. CONCLUSION:This study suggests that a multi-level intervention for reducing prolonged sedentary time is feasible for implementation at assisted living residences. The intervention could potentially help delay functional decline among older adults when they transition to a supportive living environment. Longer and larger trials to test the efficacy of SWYC are necessary. TRIAL REGISTRATION:Name of Clinical Trial Registry: clinicaltrials.gov Trial Registration number: NCT04458896 . Date of registration: July 8, 2020. (Retrospectively registered).

Project description:BACKGROUND: Occupational sedentary behaviour is an important contributor to overall sedentary risk. There is limited evidence for effective workplace interventions to reduce occupational sedentary time and increase light activity during work hours. The purpose of the study was to determine if participatory workplace interventions could reduce total sedentary time, sustained sedentary time (bouts >30 minutes), increase the frequency of breaks in sedentary time and promote light intensity activity and moderate/vigorous activity (MVPA) during work hours. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial (ANZCTR NUMBER: ACTN12612000743864) was conducted using clerical, call centre and data processing workers (n?=?62, aged 25-59 years) in 3 large government organisations in Perth, Australia. Three groups developed interventions with a participatory approach: 'Active office' (n?=?19), 'Active Workstation' and promotion of incidental office activity; 'Traditional physical activity' (n?=?14), pedometer challenge to increase activity between productive work time and 'Office ergonomics' (n?=?29), computer workstation design and breaking up computer tasks. Accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X, 7 days) determined sedentary time, sustained sedentary time, breaks in sedentary time, light intensity activity and MVPA on work days and during work hours were measured before and following a 12 week intervention period. RESULTS: For all participants there was a significant reduction in sedentary time on work days (-1.6%, p?=?0.006) and during work hours (-1.7%, p?=?0.014) and a significant increase in number of breaks/sedentary hour on work days (0.64, p?=?0.005) and during work hours (0.72, p?=?0.015); there was a concurrent significant increase in light activity during work hours (1.5%, p?=?0.012) and MVPA on work days (0.6%, p?=?0.012). CONCLUSIONS: This study explored novel ways to modify work practices to reduce occupational sedentary behaviour. Participatory workplace interventions can reduce sedentary time, increase the frequency of breaks and improve light activity and MVPA of office workers by using a variety of interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTN12612000743864.