Dataset Information

Systemic inflammation as a predictor of clinical outcomes after lower extremity angioplasty/stenting.

ABSTRACT: The activation state of the systemic inflammatory milieu has been proposed as a critical regulator of vascular repair after injury. We evaluated the early inflammatory response after endovascular intervention for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease to determine its association with clinical success or failure.Blood samples were obtained from 14 patients undergoing lower extremity angioplasty/stenting and analyzed using high-throughput gene arrays, multiplex serum protein analyses, and flow cytometry.Time-dependent plasma protein and monocyte phenotype analyses demonstrated endovascular revascularization had a modest influence on the overall activation state of the systemic inflammatory system, with baseline variability exceeding the perturbations induced by the intervention. In contrast, specific time-dependent changes in the monocyte genome are evident in the initial 28 days, predominately in those genes associated with leukocyte extravasation. Investigating the relationship between inflammation and the 1-year success or failure of the intervention showed no single plasma protein was correlated with outcome, but a more comprehensive cluster analysis revealed a clear pattern of protein expression that was closely related to the clinical phenotype. Corresponding examination of the monocyte genome identified a gene subset at 1 day postprocedure that was predictive of clinical outcome, with most of these genes active in cell-cycle signaling.Although the global influence of angioplasty/stenting on systemic inflammation was modest, circulating cytokine and monocyte genome analyses support a pattern of early inflammation that is associated with ultimate intervention success vs failure. Molecular profiles incorporating genes involved in monocyte cell-cycle progression and homing, or proinflammatory cytokines, or both, offer the most promise for the development of class prediction tools for clinical application.

SUBMITTER: DeSart K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4670612 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Systemic inflammation as a predictor of clinical outcomes after lower extremity angioplasty/stenting.

DeSart Kenneth K O'Malley Kerri K Schmit Bradley B Lopez Maria-Cecilia MC Moldawer Lyle L Baker Henry H Berceli Scott S Nelson Peter P

Journal of vascular surgery 20150606 3

<h4>Objective</h4>The activation state of the systemic inflammatory milieu has been proposed as a critical regulator of vascular repair after injury. We evaluated the early inflammatory response after endovascular intervention for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease to determine its association with clinical success or failure.<h4>Methods</h4>Blood samples were obtained from 14 patients undergoing lower extremity angioplasty/stenting and analyzed using high-throughput gene arrays, multiplex ...[more]

PMID: 26054584

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveOptimal patient selection for lower extremity revascularization remains a clinical challenge among the hemodialysis-dependent (HD). The purpose of this study was to examine contemporary real world open and endovascular outcomes of HD patients to better facilitate patient selection for intervention.MethodsA regional multicenter registry was queried between 2003 and 2013 for HD patients (N = 689) undergoing open surgical bypass (n = 295) or endovascular intervention (n = 394) for lower extremity revascularization. Patient demographics and comorbidities were recorded. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included graft patency, freedom from major adverse limb events, and amputation-free survival (AFS). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for death and amputation.ResultsAmong the 689 HD patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization, 66% were male, and 83% were white. Ninety percent of revascularizations were performed for critical limb ischemia and 8% for claudication. Overall survival at 1, 2, and 5 years survival remained low at 60%, 43%, and 21%, respectively. Overall 1- and 2-year AFS was 40% and 17%. Mortality accounted for the primary mode of failure for both open bypass (78%) and endovascular interventions (80%) at two years. Survival, AFS, and freedom from major adverse limb event outcomes did not differ significantly between revascularization techniques. At 2 years, endovascular patency was higher than open bypass (76% vs 26%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.71; P = .02). Multivariate analysis identified age ≥80 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.5; P < .01), indication of rest pain or tissue loss (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.6; P < .01), preoperative wheelchair/bedridden status (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1; P < .01), coronary artery disease (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.9; P < .01), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8; P = .01) as independent predictors of death. The presence of three or more risk factors resulted in predicted 1-year mortality of 64%.ConclusionsOverall survival and AFS among HD patients remains poor, irrespective of revascularization strategy. Mortality remains the primary driver for these findings and justifies a prudent approach to patient selection. Focus for improved results should emphasize predictors of survival to better identify those most likely to benefit from revascularization.

Project description:AimsWe performed a meta-analysis to indirectly compare the treatment effectiveness of balloon angioplasty and stenting for patients with intracranial arterial stenosis.MethodsLiterature searches were performed in well-known databases to identify eligible studies published before January 04, 2021. The incidence of restenosis, transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke, death, and dissection after balloon angioplasty or stenting were pooled. An indirect comparison of balloon angioplasty vs. stenting was performed, and the ratios of incidence (RIs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model.Results120 studies that recruited 10,107 patients with intracranial arterial stenosis were included. The pooled incidence of restenosis after balloon angioplasty and stenting were 13% (95%CI: 8-17%) and 11% (95%CI: 9-13%), respectively, with no significant difference between them (RI: 1.18; 95%CI: 0.78-1.80; P = 0.435). Moreover, the pooled incidence of TIA after balloon angioplasty and stenting was 3% (95%CI: 0-6%) and 4% (95%CI: 3%-5%), and no significant difference was observed (RI: 0.75; 95%CI: 0.01-58.53; P = 0.897). The pooled incidence of stroke after balloon angioplasty and stenting was 7% (95%CI: 5-9%) and 8% (95%CI: 7-9%), respectively, and the difference between groups was found to be statistically insignificant (RI: 0.88; 95%CI: 0.64-1.20; P = 0.413). Additionally, the pooled incidence of death after balloon angioplasty and stenting was 2% (95%CI: 1-4%) and 2% (95%CI: 1-2%), with no significant difference between groups (RI: 1.00; 95%CI: 0.44-2.27; P = 1.000). Finally, the pooled incidence of dissection after balloon angioplasty and stenting was 13% (95%CI: 5-22%) and 3% (95%CI: 2-5%), respectively, and balloon angioplasty was associated with a higher risk of dissection than that with stenting for patients with intracranial arterial stenosis (RI: 4.33; 95%CI: 1.81-10.35; P = 0.001).ConclusionThis study found that the treatment effectiveness of balloon angioplasty and stenting were similar for patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.

Project description:BackgroundVertebral artery stenosis (narrowing of the vertebral artery) is an important cause of posterior circulation ischaemic stroke. Medical treatment (MT) e.g. controlling risk-factors and drug treatment, surgery, and endovascular treatment (ET) are the prevailing treatment strategies for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis. ET consist s of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (balloon catheter through the skin), with or without stenting. However, optimal management of people with symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis has not yet been established.ObjectivesTo assess the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, with or without stenting, combined with MT, compared to MT alone, in people with episodes of cerebral ischaemia due to vertebral artery stenosis.Search methodsWe searched the Cochrane Stroke Group, MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, and two other indexes in Web of Science, China Biological Medicine Database, Chinese Science and Technique Journals Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang Data, as well as ClinicalTrials.gov trials register and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to 23 July 2021.Selection criteriaWe included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared ET plus MT with MT alone in treating people aged 18 years or over with symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis. We included all types of ET modalities (e.g. angioplasty alone, balloon-mounted stenting, and angioplasty followed by placement of a self-expanding stent). MT included risk factor control, antiplatelet therapy, lipid-lowering therapy, and individualised management for people with hypertension or diabetes.Data collection and analysisTwo review authors independently screened potentially eligible studies, extracted data, and assessed trial quality and risk of bias. We applied the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. The primary outcomes were 30-day post-randomisation death/stroke (short-term outcome) and fatal/non-fatal stroke after 30 days post-randomisation to completion of follow-up (long-term outcome). MAIN RESULTS: We included three RCTs with 349 participants with symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis with a mean age of 64.4 years. The included RCTs were at low risk of bias overall. However, all included studies had a high risk of performance bias because blinding of the ET was not feasible. There was no significant difference in 30-day post-randomisation deaths/strokes between ET plus MT and MT alone (risk ratio (RR) 2.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 7.07; 3 studies, 349 participants; low-certainty evidence). There were no significant differences between ET plus MT and MT alone in fatal/non-fatal strokes in the territory of the treated vertebral artery stenosis after 30 days post-randomisation to completion of follow-up (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.01; 3 studies, 349 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke during the entire follow-up period (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.32; 3 studies, 349 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), death during the entire follow-up period (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.62; 3 studies, 349 participants; low-certainty evidence), and stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) during the entire follow-up period (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.06; 2 studies, 234 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).Authors' conclusionsThis Cochrane Review provides low- to moderate-certainty evidence indicating that there are no significant differences in either short- or long-term risks of stroke, death, or TIA between people with symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis treated with ET plus MT and those treated with MT alone.

Project description:BackgroundThe systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), as a novel inflammatory biomarker, has recently attracted attention in cardiovascular disease research. However, the relationship between SII and risk of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (LEDVT) remains unclear to date. Thus, this study aimed to explore the association in a large sample over a 10-year period (2012-2022).MethodsAll hospitalized patients undergoing lower extremity compression ultrasonography (CUS) examination were consecutively screened by searching our hospital information system database. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify the optimal cut-off value for high and low SII group. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the relationship between SII and LEDVT risk. Propensity score matching (PSM), subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also conducted. Moreover, restricted cubic spline (RCS) regression and two-piecewise linear regression models were used to assess the dose-response relationship between natural log transformed SII [ln(SII)] and risk of LEDVT.ResultsA total of 16,725 consecutive hospitalized patients were included, and 1,962 LEDVT events occurred. After adjusting for confounding factors, patients in the high SII group (≥ 574.2 × 109/L) showed a 1.740-fold risk of LEDVT (95% CI: 1.546-1.959, P < 0.001), and elevated ln(SII) was associated with a 36.1% increased risk of LEDVT (95% CI: 1.278-1.449, P < 0.001). PSM, subgroup and sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the association. A non-linear relationship was observed (P non-linear < 0.001), with a threshold value of 5.6 × 109/L for all LEDVT events. Above the threshold, each unit increase in ln(SII) had a 1.369-fold higher risk of LEDVT (95% CI: 1.271-1.475, P < 0.001). The association also existed in both distal and proximal LEDVT.ConclusionElevated SII is significantly associated with an increased risk of LEDVT in hospitalized patients. Additionally, the association is non-linear and exhibit a threshold effect.

Project description:Our aim was to evaluate the effect of gender on early and late procedural and functional outcomes of lower extremity bypass (LEB).We reviewed the records of 2576 patients (828 women; 32%) who underwent LEB for claudication or critical limb ischemia (CLI) in the Vascular Study Group of New England from 2003 to 2010. Logistic regression and proportional hazards models were used to adjust for potential confounding differences between genders. Morbidity, mortality, graft patency, freedom from major amputation, ambulation, and living status were analyzed postoperatively and over 1 year.Women were older (70 vs 68 years; P < .001), had more hypertension (89% vs 85%; P = .006), less coronary artery disease (35% vs 39%; P = .03), smoking (73% vs 88%; P < .001), and preoperative statin use (60% vs 64%; P = .04). Women were more likely to have CLI (76% vs 71%; P = .003), and ambulate with assistance at presentation (19% vs 16%; P = .02). Morbidity was similar except women had higher rates of reoperation for thrombosis (4% vs 2%; P < .001) without differences in major amputation (2% vs 1%; P = .13) or in-hospital mortality (1.7% vs 1.7%; P = .96). Women and men with claudication had similar 1-year graft patency rates. Women with CLI had lower rates of primary (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.48; P = .02), assisted primary (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.15-1.76; P = .001) and secondary patency (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.10-1.77; P = .006) during the first year compared with men. Freedom from amputation was similar for men and women with CLI (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.84-1.63; P = .36). There were no differences in late survival between women and men with claudication (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.60-1.31; P = .36) or CLI (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.81-1.09; P = .39). More female claudicants were not independently ambulatory at discharge (30% vs 19%; P = .002) and were discharged to a nursing home (15% vs 5%; P < .001) but these differences did not persist at 1 year. Women with CLI were more likely to be nonambulatory at discharge (13% vs 9%; P = .006) and at 1 year (13% vs 8%; P < .001). More women with CLI were discharged to a nursing home (44% vs 35%; P = .01) and resided there at 1 year (11% vs 7%; P = .02).Women have complication rates similar to men with inferior early and late functional outcomes after LEB. The reduced patency rates in women with CLI did not translate into differences in limb salvage. These findings might help define physician and patient expectations for women before revascularization.

Dataset Information

Systemic inflammation as a predictor of clinical outcomes after lower extremity angioplasty/stenting.

Publications

Systemic inflammation as a predictor of clinical outcomes after lower extremity angioplasty/stenting.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets