Dataset Information

Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies.

ABSTRACT: Questions persist concerning the comparative effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG). The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) collaborated to compare the rates of long-term survival after PCI and CABG.We linked the ACCF National Cardiovascular Data Registry and the STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database to claims data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for the years 2004 through 2008. Outcomes were compared with the use of propensity scores and inverse-probability-weighting adjustment to reduce treatment-selection bias.Among patients 65 years of age or older who had two-vessel or three-vessel coronary artery disease without acute myocardial infarction, 86,244 underwent CABG and 103,549 underwent PCI. The median follow-up period was 2.67 years. At 1 year, there was no significant difference in adjusted mortality between the groups (6.24% in the CABG group as compared with 6.55% in the PCI group; risk ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 1.00). At 4 years, there was lower mortality with CABG than with PCI (16.4% vs. 20.8%; risk ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.82). Similar results were noted in multiple subgroups and with the use of several different analytic methods. Residual confounding was assessed by means of a sensitivity analysis.In this observational study, we found that, among older patients with multivessel coronary disease that did not require emergency treatment, there was a long-term survival advantage among patients who underwent CABG as compared with patients who underwent PCI. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.).

SUBMITTER: Weintraub WS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4671393 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies.

Weintraub William S WS Grau-Sepulveda Maria V MV Weiss Jocelyn M JM O'Brien Sean M SM Peterson Eric D ED Kolm Paul P Zhang Zugui Z Klein Lloyd W LW Shaw Richard E RE McKay Charles C Ritzenthaler Laura L LL Popma Jeffrey J JJ Messenger John C JC Shahian David M DM Grover Frederick L FL Mayer John E JE Shewan Cynthia M CM Garratt Kirk N KN Moussa Issam D ID Dangas George D GD Edwards Fred H FH

The New England journal of medicine 20120327 16

<h4>Background</h4>Questions persist concerning the comparative effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG). The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) collaborated to compare the rates of long-term survival after PCI and CABG.<h4>Methods</h4>We linked the ACCF National Cardiovascular Data Registry and the STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database to claims data from the Centers for Medicare an ...[more]

PMID: 22452338

Similar Datasets

Project description:Whether fractional flow reserve (FFR) should be available for revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD) is controversial. We aimed to compare the efficacy of various complete revascularization (CR) regimens for STEMI patients with MVD. The PubMed and Cochrane Library databases and clinicaltrial.gov were searched for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the FFR-guided CR, angiography-guided CR, and culprit-only revascularization (COR) strategies in STEMI patients with MVD. A Bayesian random-effect model was employed to synthesize the evidence in network meta-analysis. We used relative risk (RR) and 95% credible interval (CrI) as measures of effect size. The primary endpoint was the composite outcome of all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction (MI). Twelve RCTs were included. Angiography-guided CR showed a lower event rate of the composite outcome (RR, 0.68; 95%CrI, 0.50-0.87), all-cause mortality (RR, 0.75; 95%CrI, 0.55-0.96), MI (RR, 0.63; 95%CrI, 0.43-0.86), and repeat revascularization (RR, 0.36; 95% CrI, 0.24-0.55) compared with COR. Additionally, angiography-guided CR had a lower risk of primary outcome (RR, 0.64; 95%CrI, 0.38-0.94) and MI (RR, 0.58; 95%CrI, 0.31-0.92) than FFR-guided CR. The difference between the FFR-guided CR and COR in terms of composite outcome, all-cause mortality, and MI was similar. Angiography-guided CR was associated with the highest probability of optimal treatment for the primary outcome (98.5%), followed by FFR-guided CR (1.2%) and COR (0.3%). STEMI patients with MVD benefitted more from angiography-guided CR than from FFR-guided CR. However, only one study compared the effectiveness of FFR-guided and angiography-guided PCI; thus, the comparison between FFR-guided and angiography-guided PCI relied on indirect evidence. Therefore, further studies directly comparing the effectiveness of these two CR strategies are warranted.

Project description:Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the 2nd leading cause of cancer death in the US, though CRC death can be reduced by screening. However, there is uncertainty as to which screening strategy is most clinically and cost-effective from a population perspective where the aim is to optimize completion of the entire screening process continuum. Modeling studies suggest benefits and harms of colonoscopy and stool blood test strategies are similar, but generally assume 100% participation and subsequent clinically appropriate follow up--something never achieved in clinical practice. Comparative effectiveness studies of testing strategies, including comparisons of specific tests and approaches to optimizing effective test use, are necessary. Safety-net health systems care for populations at increased risk for adverse CRC outcomes, such as the uninsured and minorities, and have more limited resources. Therefore, safety-nets must resolve the uncertainty regarding the most effective screening strategy. The investigators will conduct a system-level, randomized comparative effectiveness trial of the benefits, harms, and costs of 3 screening strategies over 3 years, among 6000 patients age 50-64 years, who are not up-to-date with CRC screening, served by a large safety net health system. The three strategies studied will be: 1) Fecal immunochemical testing, with annual mailed invitation outreach (including a test kit), and a centralized process to promote participation and complete clinical follow up (FIT); 2) Colonoscopy, with annual mailed invitation outreach, and a centralized process to promote participation and complete clinical follow up (Colo); 3) Usual Care, with no mailed invitation outreach, and screening offered at primary care visits. The primary measure of benefit will be an outcome measure that summarizes patient-specific effective screening successes. The primary measure of harm will be screening non-participation. The primary measure of cost will be cost per-patient effectively screened. Our specific aims are to: 1) Compare benefits, harms, and costs of a FIT strategy versus a Colo strategy for CRC screening among patients not up-to-date with screening, and 2) Compare benefits, harms, and costs of a) the FIT strategy vs. Usual Care and b) the Colo strategy vs. Usual Care for CRC screening.

Project description:BackgroundRandomized studies have shown optimal medical therapy to be as efficacious as revascularization in stable ischemic heart disease (IHD). It is not known if these efficacy results are reflected by real-world effectiveness.ObjectiveTo evaluate the comparative effectiveness of routine medical therapy versus revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in stable IHD.DesignObservational cohort study.PatientsStable IHD patients from 1 October 2008 to 30 September 2011, identified using a Registry of all angiography patients in Ontario, Canada.InterventionRevascularization, defined as PCI/CABG within 90 days after index angiography.Main measuresDeath, myocardial infarction (MI) or repeat PCI/CABG. Revascularization was compared to medical therapy using a) multivariable Cox-proportional hazard models with therapy strategy treated as a time-varying covariate; and b) a propensity score matched analysis. Post-angiography medication use was determined.Key resultsWe identified 39,131 stable IHD patients, of whom 15,139 were treated medically, and 23,992 were revascularized (PCI = 15,604; CABG = 8,388). Mean follow-up was 2.5 years. Revascularization was associated with fewer deaths (HR 0.76; 95 % CI 0.68-0.84; p < 0.001) ,MIs (HR 0.78; 95 % CI 0.72-0.85; p < 0.001) and repeat PCI/CABG (HR 0.59; 95 % CI 0.50-0.70; p < 0.001) than medical therapy. In the propensity-matched analysis of 12,362 well-matched pairs of revascularized and medical therapy patients, fewer deaths (8.6 % vs 12.7 %; HR 0.75; 95 % CI 0.69-0.81; p < 0.001) , MIs (11.7 % vs 14.4 %; HR 0.84; 95 % CI 0.77-0.93 p < 0.001) and repeat PCI/CABG ( 17.4 % vs 24.1 %;HR 0.67; 95 % 0.63-0.71; p < 0.001) occurred in revascularized patients, over the 4.1 years of follow-up. The revascularization patients had higher uptake of clopidogrel (70.3 % vs 27.2 %; p < 0.001), ?-blockers (78.2 % vs 76.7 %; p = 0.010), and statins (94.7 % vs 91.5 %, p < 0.001) in the 1-year post-angiogram.ConclusionsStable IHD patients treated with revascularization had improved risk-adjusted outcomes in clinical practice, potentially due to under-treatment of medical therapy patients.

Dataset Information

Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies.

Publications

Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets