Dataset Information

Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To investigate whether language used in science abstracts can skew towards the use of strikingly positive and negative words over time.

Design

Retrospective analysis of all scientific abstracts in PubMed between 1974 and 2014.

Methods

The yearly frequencies of positive, negative, and neutral words (25 preselected words in each category), plus 100 randomly selected words were normalised for the total number of abstracts. Subanalyses included pattern quantification of individual words, specificity for selected high impact journals, and comparison between author affiliations within or outside countries with English as the official majority language. Frequency patterns were compared with 4% of all books ever printed and digitised by use of Google Books Ngram Viewer.

Main outcome measures

Frequencies of positive and negative words in abstracts compared with frequencies of words with a neutral and random connotation, expressed as relative change since 1980.

Results

The absolute frequency of positive words increased from 2.0% (1974-80) to 17.5% (2014), a relative increase of 880% over four decades. All 25 individual positive words contributed to the increase, particularly the words "robust," "novel," "innovative," and "unprecedented," which increased in relative frequency up to 15,000%. Comparable but less pronounced results were obtained when restricting the analysis to selected journals with high impact factors. Authors affiliated to an institute in a non-English speaking country used significantly more positive words. Negative word frequencies increased from 1.3% (1974-80) to 3.2% (2014), a relative increase of 257%. Over the same time period, no apparent increase was found in neutral or random word use, or in the frequency of positive word use in published books.

Conclusions

Our lexicographic analysis indicates that scientific abstracts are currently written with more positive and negative words, and provides an insight into the evolution of scientific writing. Apparently scientists look on the bright side of research results. But whether this perception fits reality should be questioned.

SUBMITTER: Vinkers CH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4677695 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: The incidence of small renal masses (SRMs) has increased in recent years in line with increased in abdominal imaging. SRMs are defined as enhancing solid lesions measuring ? 4cm. We present our experience with percutaneous renal tumour biopsy (RTB) of SRMs, which to our knowledge, is the largest to date. Methods: We reviewed our database to ascertain the incidence of benign, malignant and non-diagnostic biopsies of SRMs performed at our institution from 2001 to July 2013. A total of 519 RTBs were performed (496 SRMs). The diagnostic rate was compared over time. The accuracy of the biopsies was correlated with the definitive pathology in the cases where the biopsy led to surgery. Results: The mean size of the 519 biopsied lesions was 2.5 (±0.9) cm. The diagnostic rate at the first biopsy was 89.1% (442/496). Of the diagnostic biopsies, 116 (26.2%) were benign and 326 (73.7%) were malignant. Of the 54 non-diagnostic biopsies, 23 (42.6%) had a repeat biopsy. A diagnosis was obtained in 19 cases (82.6%; 8 [42.1%] benign, 11 [57.9%] malignant). Therefore RTB led to a diagnosis in 461 of the 496 SRMs (92.9%). Over time, there was a decrease in the rate of non-diagnostic biopsies from 15.0% to 6.0% (p>0.05). Of the available surgical pathology, there was agreement between histology in 92.5% (125/135). For the conventional cell carcinoma (n=85), there was concordance between histology and grade in 97.6% (83/85) and 96.1% (74/77), respectively. Conclusions: RTB of SRMs provided a diagnosis in 92.9% of the cases. Surgery was avoided in more than 23% of patients following RTB because of benign histology. The rate of non-diagnostic biopsies diminished over time. Finally, there was a high correlation between the biopsy and the final pathology with regards to both histology and grade. In an era where overdiagnosis and overtreatment of favourable cancers is gaining attention, routine RTB for SRM leads to diminished intervention and, going forward ,personalization of care.