Dataset Information

Safety, tolerability and effects on cardiometabolic risk factors of empagliflozin monotherapy in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: a double-blind extension of a Phase III randomized controlled trial.

ABSTRACT: To investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of empagliflozin monotherapy compared with placebo and sitagliptin in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Of 899 patients randomized to receive empagliflozin 10 mg, empagliflozin 25 mg, placebo, or sitagliptin 100 mg once daily for 24 weeks, 615 continued in a double-blind extension trial for ?52 weeks. Exploratory endpoints included changes from baseline in HbA1c, weight and blood pressure at week 76.Compared with placebo, adjusted mean changes from baseline in HbA1c at week 76 were -0.78 % (95 % CI -0.94, -0.63; p < 0.001) and -0.89 % (95 % CI -1.04, -0.73; p < 0.001) for empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg, respectively. Compared with placebo, adjusted mean changes from baseline in weight at week 76 were -1.8 kg (95 % CI -2.4, -1.3; p < 0.001) and -2.0 kg (95 % CI -2.6, -1.5; p < 0.001) for empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg, respectively. Empagliflozin led to reductions in systolic blood pressure (SBP) compared with placebo in the primary analysis but not in sensitivity analyses. Compared with sitagliptin, empagliflozin 25 mg reduced HbA1c and both empagliflozin doses reduced weight and SBP. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 76.8, 78.0, 76.4 and 72.2 % of patients on empagliflozin 10 mg, empagliflozin 25 mg, placebo and sitagliptin, respectively. Confirmed hypoglycaemic AEs (glucose ?3.9 mmol/l and/or requiring assistance) were reported in two patients (0.9 %) per treatment group.Empagliflozin monotherapy for ?76 weeks was well tolerated and led to sustained reductions in HbA1c and weight compared with placebo.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01289990.

SUBMITTER: Roden M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4690334 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Safety, tolerability and effects on cardiometabolic risk factors of empagliflozin monotherapy in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes: a double-blind extension of a Phase III randomized controlled trial.

Roden Michael M Merker Ludwig L Christiansen Anita Vedel AV Roux Flavien F Salsali Afshin A Kim Gabriel G Stella Peter P Woerle Hans J HJ Broedl Uli C UC

Cardiovascular diabetology 20151223

<h4>Background</h4>To investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of empagliflozin monotherapy compared with placebo and sitagliptin in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.<h4>Methods</h4>Of 899 patients randomized to receive empagliflozin 10 mg, empagliflozin 25 mg, placebo, or sitagliptin 100 mg once daily for 24 weeks, 615 continued in a double-blind extension trial for ≥52 weeks. Exploratory endpoints included changes from baseline in HbA1c, weight and blood pressure at week ...[more]

PMID: 26701110

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimsThis post hoc analysis assessed the efficacy and safety/tolerability of adjunctive perampanel in patients from China (aged ≥12 years) with focal seizures (FS), with/without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS), or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS).MethodsStudy centers in China were identified using data from five double-blind, randomized, phase III studies of adjunctive perampanel (2-12 mg/day) and their open-label extensions (OLEx). Efficacy assessments included median percent reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days, and 50% and 75% responder and seizure-freedom rates. Safety/tolerability assessments included monitoring of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).ResultsOverall, 277 patients (placebo, n = 79; perampanel, n = 198) were included in the double-blind safety analysis set. The full analysis set comprised 274 patients (FS, n = 238 [placebo, n = 60; perampanel, n = 178]; FBTCS, n = 120 [placebo, n = 31; perampanel, n = 89]; GTCS, n = 36 [placebo, n = 18; perampanel, n = 18]). Median percent reductions in seizure frequency for placebo vs perampanel were as follows: 16.6% vs 32.4% (FS; P < 0.05) and 39.1% vs 48.2% (FBTCS; not significant [NS]) at 4-12 mg/day, and 37.9% vs 82.6% (GTCS; NS) at 8 mg/day; 50% responder rates were 31.7% vs 37.4% (FS; NS), 48.4% vs 51.9% (FBTCS; NS), and 33.3% vs 61.1% (GTCS; NS), respectively. Seizure-freedom rates were 1.7% vs 9.2%, 16.1% vs 25.3%, and 16.7% vs 44.4%, respectively (all NS). Overall, 262 patients entered the OLEx (FS, n = 228; GTCS, n = 34). Perampanel was efficacious for up to four years for FS and FBTCS and up to two years for GTCS. Across the double-blind and OLEx studies, TEAEs were reported in 65.7% and 81.3% of perampanel-treated patients, respectively; the most common was dizziness. Efficacy and safety/tolerability outcomes were generally similar between Chinese and non-Chinese patients.ConclusionAdjunctive perampanel (up to 12 mg/day) may be a suitable treatment for Chinese patients with FS, with/without FBTCS, or GTCS, with similar efficacy and safety/tolerability compared to non-Chinese patients.

Project description:ObjectiveTo prospectively assess the efficacy, general safety, and joint safety of fasinumab, an anti-nerve growth factor monoclonal antibody, in osteoarthritis (OA) hip and/or knee pain.MethodsPatients with moderate-to-severe OA pain (knee or hip) and history of inadequate response or intolerance to analgesics were randomized to receive fasinumab (at 1 mg, 3 mg, 6 mg, or 9 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks over 16 weeks and were followed up to week 36. Efficacy end points were the change from baseline to week 16 in the pain and physical function subscale scores of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC), and patient global assessment (PGA) of OA. Joints were monitored at scheduled assessments (by plain film radiography and magnetic resonance imaging) during treatment and follow-up, and if prompted, at the time of active joint symptoms.ResultsOf the 421 patients randomized, 342 completed the 36-week study. All doses of fasinumab yielded statistically significant and clinically important reductions in pain compared to placebo (least squares mean difference in WOMAC pain subscale scores at week 16 ranging -0.78 to -1.40), without any clear dose dependence. Physical function and PGA scores improved in parallel. Treatment-emergent adverse event rates were 17% with fasinumab and 10% with placebo, and 4% and 1% of patients, respectively, discontinued treatment. Arthropathies (25 in total, 7% of fasinumab-treated patients and 1% of placebo-treated patients) occurred in a dose-dependent manner, with 2 occurring in patients receiving the lowest dose of fasinumab and 10 in patients receiving the highest dose. Most of the arthropathies (16 of 25) were discovered with scheduled radiographs and not based on symptoms. Destructive arthropathy (in 1 of 337 treated patients) occurred in 1 patient who was receiving 6 mg fasimumab.ConclusionFasinumab provided improvements in OA pain and function, even in those benefitting little from previous analgesics. The observed benefit-to-risk relationship favors further clinical development to explore the lowest doses of fasinumab in patients with knee or hip OA.

Project description:IntroductionThe long-term safety of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) has been studied in mainly Caucasian patients. The present interim analysis aimed to evaluate the 72-week safety of DMF in Japanese patients with RRMS.MethodsSafety data of Japanese subjects enrolled in the 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled APEX study (Part I) and its following open-label extension (Part II) were analysed at 72 weeks from the beginning of Part I. In Part I, subjects were randomised to DMF treatment or matching placebo while all subjects received DMF treatment during Part II. Adverse events (AEs) reported throughout the study period were recorded.ResultsOverall, 109 Japanese subjects completed 72 weeks of treatment. The incidence of AEs and serious AEs was 95% and 19%, respectively, in the DMF group compared with 84% and 18%, respectively, in the placebo group at 24 weeks. Common AEs (at least 5%) reported with treatment included nasopharyngitis, flushing, hot flush, gastrointestinal events, pruritus, rash, headache, increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). AEs led to discontinuation of DMF in 5% of patients and included MS relapse, flushing, abdominal pain, liver disorder and increased ALT/AST. After an initial decrease from baseline of 17% in the DMF group at week 24, the mean lymphocyte counts stabilised and were maintained until week 72. No opportunistic/serious infections nor malignancies were reported with DMF treatment. The incidences of AEs, serious AEs, and discontinuation due to AEs were similar between the DMF and the placebo groups.ConclusionThe 72-week safety profile of DMF in Japanese patients with RRMS was consistent with previous studies that enrolled mostly Caucasian patients, with a lower incidence of flushing and related symptoms and a lower reduction in the lymphocyte count compared with previous reports.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01838668.FundingBiogen Japan Ltd.

Project description:IntroductionWe characterized the safety and tolerability of empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, empagliflozin 10 mg, or empagliflozin 25 mg in clinical trials.MethodsPooled data were analyzed from patients with T2DM treated with placebo (N = 4203), empagliflozin 10 mg (N = 4221), or empagliflozin 25 mg (N = 4196) in 15 randomized phase I-III trials plus four extension studies. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed descriptively in participants who took at least one dose of study drug. AE incidence rates per 100 patient-years were calculated to adjust for differences in drug exposure between trials.ResultsTotal exposure was 7369, 7782, and 7754 patient-years in the placebo, empagliflozin 10 mg, and 25 mg groups, respectively. The incidence of any AEs, severe AEs, serious AEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation was no higher in participants treated with empagliflozin vs. placebo. Empagliflozin was not associated with an increased risk of hypoglycemia vs. placebo, except in participants on background sulfonylurea. The incidence of events consistent with urinary tract infection was similar across treatment groups (8.7-9.5/100 patient-years). Events consistent with genital infection occurred more frequently in participants treated with empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg (3.5 and 3.4/100 patient-years, respectively) than placebo (0.9/100 patient-years). The incidence of AEs consistent with volume depletion was similar across treatment groups (1.7-1.9/100 patient-years) but was higher with empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg vs. placebo in participants aged 75 years or older (3.2 and 3.0 vs. 2.3/100 patient-years, respectively). The rates of bone fractures, cancer events, renal AEs, venous thromboembolic events, hepatic injury, acute pancreatitis, lower limb amputations, and diabetic ketoacidosis were similar across treatment groups.ConclusionThis analysis of pooled safety data based on more than 15,000 patient-years' exposure supports a favorable benefit-risk profile of empagliflozin in patients with T2DM.FundingBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH.

Project description:A 14-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study of Japanese patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) who were randomized to either duloxetine 60?mg once daily or placebo.This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of duloxetine monotherapy in Japanese patients with CLBP.In Japan, duloxetine is approved for the treatment of depression, diabetic neuropathic pain, and pain associated with fibromyalgia; however, no clinical study of duloxetine has been conducted for CLBP.The primary efficacy measure was the change in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) average pain score from baseline to Week 14. Secondary efficacy measures included BPI pain (worst pain, least pain, pain right now), Patient's Global Impression of Improvement, Clinical Global Impressions of Severity, and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, among other measures, and safety and tolerability.In total, 458 patients were randomized to receive either duloxetine (n?=?232) or placebo (n?=?226). The BPI average pain score improved significantly in the duloxetine group compared with that in the placebo group at Week 14 [-2.43?±?0.11 vs. -1.96?±?0.11, respectively; between-group difference (95% confidence interval),?-?0.46 [-0.77 to-0.16]; P?=?0.0026]. The duloxetine group showed significant improvement in many secondary measures compared with the placebo group, including BPI pain (least pain, pain right now) (between-group difference: -1.69?±?0.10, P?=?0.0009; -2.42?±?0.12, P P?=?0.0230, respectively), Patient's Global Impression of Improvement (2.46?±?0.07, P?=?0.0026), Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (-1.46?±?0.06, P?=?0.0019), and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (-3.86?±?0.22, P?=?0.0439). Adverse events occurring at a significantly higher incidence in the duloxetine group were somnolence, constipation, nausea, dizziness, and dry mouth, most of which were mild or moderate in severity and were resolved or improved.Duloxetine 60?mg was effective and well tolerated in Japanese CLBP patients.2.

Dataset Information

Safety, tolerability and effects on cardiometabolic risk factors of empagliflozin monotherapy in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: a double-blind extension of a Phase III randomized controlled trial.

Publications

Safety, tolerability and effects on cardiometabolic risk factors of empagliflozin monotherapy in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes: a double-blind extension of a Phase III randomized controlled trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets