Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Association between EPHX1 rs1051740 and lung cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Microsomal epoxide hydrolase 1 (EPHX1) may play an important role in epigenetic change and DNA repair concerned with lung cancer. Several studies have investigated the association between EPHX1 rs1051740 and lung cancer risk, but there is no consensus. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to further identify the relationship. METHODS:The Pubmed and Embase databases were searched for eligible studies. An odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was used to assess the correlation between EPHX1 rs1051740 polymorphism and lung cancer risk through a meta-analysis. RESULTS:Overall, no significant relationship was found between EPHX1 rs1051740 and lung cancer risk (CC vs. TT: OR=1.10, 95% CI=0.88-1.36; CC+CT vs. TT: OR=1.02, 95% CI=0.88-1.18; CC vs. TT+CT: OR=1.08, 95% CI=0.91-1.27; C vs. T: OR=1.04, 95% CI=0.93-1.17; CT vs. TT: OR=0.98, 95% CI=0.85-1.13). Nevertheless, further subgroup analysis by ethnicity demonstrated that EPHX1 rs1051740 with CC genotype or C allele was an increased risk for lung cancer in Asians (CC vs. TT: OR=1.54, 95% CI=1.23-1.94; CC vs. TT+CT: OR=1.43, 95% CI=1.20-1.71; C vs. T: OR=1.26, 95% CI=1.08-1.47). CONCLUSIONS:This meta-analysis indicates that EPHX1 rs1051740 with CC genotype or C allele may be a risk factor in Asians.

SUBMITTER: Zhang P 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4694288 | biostudies-literature | 2015

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Association between EPHX1 rs1051740 and lung cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis.

Zhang Peng P   Zhang Youzhi Y   Yang Haihua H   Li Wenjing W   Chen Xiaodong X   Long Feng F  

International journal of clinical and experimental medicine 20151015 10


<h4>Background</h4>Microsomal epoxide hydrolase 1 (EPHX1) may play an important role in epigenetic change and DNA repair concerned with lung cancer. Several studies have investigated the association between EPHX1 rs1051740 and lung cancer risk, but there is no consensus. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to further identify the relationship.<h4>Methods</h4>The Pubmed and Embase databases were searched for eligible studies. An odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was used to  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4522474 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4735583 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5731205 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6022322 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3335067 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6636285 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3853705 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4537972 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5620154 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3622000 | biostudies-literature