Dataset Information

Personalized Circulating Tumor DNA Biomarkers Dynamically Predict Treatment Response and Survival In Gynecologic Cancers.

ABSTRACT:

Background

High-grade serous ovarian and endometrial cancers are the most lethal female reproductive tract malignancies worldwide. In part, failure to treat these two aggressive cancers successfully centers on the fact that while the majority of patients are diagnosed based on current surveillance strategies as having a complete clinical response to their primary therapy, nearly half will develop disease recurrence within 18 months and the majority will die from disease recurrence within 5 years. Moreover, no currently used biomarkers or imaging studies can predict outcome following initial treatment. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a theoretically powerful biomarker for detecting otherwise occult disease. We therefore explored the use of personalized ctDNA markers as both a surveillance and prognostic biomarker in gynecologic cancers and compared this to current FDA-approved surveillance tools.

Methods and findings

Tumor and serum samples were collected at time of surgery and then throughout treatment course for 44 patients with gynecologic cancers, representing 22 ovarian cancer cases, 17 uterine cancer cases, one peritoneal, three fallopian tube, and one patient with synchronous fallopian tube and uterine cancer. Patient/tumor-specific mutations were identified using whole-exome and targeted gene sequencing and ctDNA levels quantified using droplet digital PCR. CtDNA was detected in 93.8% of patients for whom probes were designed and levels were highly correlated with CA-125 serum and computed tomography (CT) scanning results. In six patients, ctDNA detected the presence of cancer even when CT scanning was negative and, on average, had a predictive lead time of seven months over CT imaging. Most notably, undetectable levels of ctDNA at six months following initial treatment was associated with markedly improved progression free and overall survival.

Conclusions

Detection of residual disease in gynecologic, and indeed all cancers, represents a diagnostic dilemma and a potential critical inflection point in precision medicine. This study suggests that the use of personalized ctDNA biomarkers in gynecologic cancers can identify the presence of residual tumor while also more dynamically predicting response to treatment relative to currently used serum and imaging studies. Of particular interest, ctDNA was an independent predictor of survival in patients with ovarian and endometrial cancers. Earlier recognition of disease persistence and/or recurrence and the ability to stratify into better and worse outcome groups through ctDNA surveillance may open the window for improved survival and quality and life in these cancers.

SUBMITTER: Pereira E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4696808 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) and carcinosarcomas (CSs) are rare, highly aggressive variants of endometrial cancer. No reliable tumor biomarkers are currently available to guide response to treatment or detection of early recurrence in USC/CS patients. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) identified using ultrasensitive technology such as droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) may represent a novel platform for the identification of occult disease. We explored the use of personalized ctDNA markers for monitoring USC and CS patients. Tumor and plasma samples from USC/CS patients were collected at the time of surgery and/or during the treatment course for assessment of tumor-specific somatic structural variants (SSVs) by a clinical-grade next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform (i.e., Foundation Medicine) and a droplet digital PCR instrument (Raindance, ddPCR). The level of ctDNA was quantified by droplet digital PCR in plasma samples and correlated to clinical findings, including CA-125 serum and/or computed tomography (CT) scanning results. The genomic-profiling-based assay identified mutated "driver" target genes for ctDNA analysis in all USC/CS patients. In multiple patients, longitudinal ctDNA testing was able to detect the presence of cancer cells before the recurrent tumor was clinically detectable by either CA-125 or CT scanning. Persistent undetectable levels of ctDNA following initial treatment were associated with prolonged progression-free and overall survival. In a USC patient, CA-125 and TP53 mutations but not PIK3CA mutations become undetectable in the plasma at the time of recurrence, suggesting that more than one customized probe should be used for monitoring ctDNA. Longitudinal ctDNA testing using tumor-informed assays may identify the presence of residual tumors, predict responses to treatment, and identify early recurrences in USC/CS patients. Recognition of disease persistence and/or recurrence through ctDNA surveillance may allow earlier treatment of recurrent disease and has the potential to change clinical practice in the management of USC and CS patients. CtDNA validation studies in USC/CS patients prospectively enrolled in treatment trials are warranted.

Project description:Molecular characterization of cancers is important in dictating prognostic factors and directing therapy. Next-generation sequencing of plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers less invasive, more convenient collection, and a more real-time representation of a tumor and its molecular heterogeneity than tissue. However, little is known about the clinical implications of ctDNA assessment in gynecologic cancer. We describe the molecular landscape identified on ctDNA, ctDNA concordance with tissue-based analysis, and factors associated with overall survival (OS) in gynecologic cancer patients with ctDNA analysis. We reviewed clinicopathologic and genomic information for 105 consecutive gynecologic cancer patients with ctDNA analysis, including 78 with tissue-based sequencing, enrolled in the Profile-Related Evidence Determining Individualized Cancer Therapy (NCT02478931) trial at the University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center starting July 2014. Tumors included ovarian (47.6%), uterine (35.2%), cervical (12.4%), vulvovaginal (2.9%), and unknown gynecologic primary (1.9%). Most ovarian and uterine cancers (86%) were high grade. 34% (N = 17) of ovarian cancers had BRCA alterations, and 22% (N = 11) were platinum sensitive. Patients received median 2 (range 0-13) lines of therapy prior to ctDNA collection. Most (75.2%) had at least one characterized alteration on ctDNA analysis, and the majority had unique genomic profiles on ctDNA. Most common alterations were TP53 (N = 59, 56.2% of patients), PIK3CA (N = 26, 24.8%), KRAS (N = 14, 13.3%), BRAF (N = 10, 9.5%), ERBB2 (N = 8, 7.6%), and MYC (N = 8, 7.6%). Higher ctDNA maximum mutation allele frequency was associated with worse OS [hazard ratio (HR): 1.91, P = 0.03], while therapy matched to ctDNA alterations (N = 33 patients) was independently associated with improved OS (HR: 0.34, P = 0.007) compared to unmatched therapy (N = 28 patients) in multivariate analysis. Tissue and ctDNA genomic results showed high concordance unaffected by temporal or spatial factors. This study provides evidence for the utility of ctDNA in determining outcome and individualizing cancer therapy in patients with gynecologic cancer.