Dataset Information

Prognostic factors for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with gemcitabine-platinum as first-line therapy in an observational setting in China.

ABSTRACT:

Background

This study examined the prognostic factors associated with survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving gemcitabine-platinum regimens as first-line therapy in real-world clinical settings in China.

Methods

Data was analyzed from a multinational, prospective, non-interventional, observational study of individuals receiving gemcitabine-platinum regimens as first-line therapy for NSCLC, focusing on 300 patients from mainland China. A Cox regression model was used to determine the association of 38 prognostic factors, including patient smoking characteristics, with overall survival.

Results

In these 300 patients, the mean age was 58.9 (±10.8) years, with males comprising 71% of the population. Thirty percent of patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of 0 and 70% had a PS of 1. The majority of patients had NSCLC of adenocarcinoma origin (57%). Multivariate Cox regression analyses adjusted for baseline factors revealed that gender, tumor (T) staging, metastasis (M) staging, liver metastases, serum albumin, and superior vena cava obstruction were significant prognostic factors. Smoking during therapy was not significantly associated with survival, although numbers were small for this variable (n = 16). Weight loss of >10% was a significant prognostic factor for adverse events.

Conclusions

Gender, T staging, M staging, liver metastases, superior vena cava obstruction, and serum albumin are prognostic factors affecting overall survival in mainland Chinese patients receiving first-line gemcitabine-platinum regimens for advanced NSCLC. These negative prognostic factors may warrant further investigation in clinical trials.

SUBMITTER: Ye W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4704354 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDoublet platin-chemotherapy was the old standard treatment for different histology types of advanced and metastatic lung cancer (LC) and is still an option for patients who are not eligible for immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, in low- and middle-income countries, chemotherapy, either in monotherapy or in combination with platinum, is still the only accessible option in public institutions. The efficacy of different platin-based chemotherapy in patients with LC who are treatment-naïve is unknown.MethodsIn this retrospective study, we selected patients with advanced and metastatic (IIIB-IVB) non-squamous non-small cell LC (NSCLC), squamous NSCLC, and lung neuroendocrine tumours (small cell LC (SCLC), large cell neuroendocrine, and atypical carcinoid) aged beyond 18 years who received first-line chemotherapy (docetaxel, gemcitabine, etoposide, paclitaxel, pemetrexed, and vinorelbine) combined with platinum between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2022. Within the population with non-squamous NSCLC, squamous NSCLC, and neuroendocrine tumours, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary assessed endpoints. Hematologic safety was the secondary endpoint.ResultsOverall, 611 patients were included. In the group of patients with non-squamous NSCLC (n = 390), there was no statistical difference between subgroups of patients who received first-line platin-chemotherapy. The median PFS was 182 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 167-208) days (hazard ratio for progression: NR [Not Reached]; p = 0.37), and the median OS was 446 (95 % CI, 405-559) days (hazard ratio for death: 1.31; 95 % CI, 0.94 - 1.82; p = 0.1). In the group of patients with squamous NSCLC (n = 149), we note the absence of statistical significance between subgroups of patients who received platin-based chemotherapy. The median PFS was 195 (95 % CI, 142-238; hazard ratio for progression: 1.21, 95 % CI, 0.29-5.02; p = 0.27), while the median OS was 428 (95 % CI, 324-940) days (hazard ratio for death: 1.76; 95 % CI, 0.93 to 3.3; p = 0.32). The absence of significance has been noticed in the neuroendocrine subgroup of patients who received first etoposide-platinum, vinorelbine-platinum, or paclitaxel-platinum (n = 72). The median PFS was 216 (95 % CI, 193-277) days; hazard ratio for progression: 1.74, 95 % CI, 0.41-7.27; p = 0.69, while the median OS was 273 (95 % CI, 241-459) days (hazard ratio for death: 2.95; 95 % CI, 0.4-21.7; p = 0.51). Grade 3-4 neutropenia grade was the predominant adverse event associated with chemotherapy in almost 11 % of patients.ConclusionMoving forward, treatment strategies must be refined for patients, with an emphasis on increasing the number of patients who can benefit from emergent approaches in order to guarantee a wider, deeper, and longer-lasting outcome.

Project description:BackgroundAlthough the platinum regimen is adopted widely nowadays in spite of the excessive side effects, there is still no international standard for palliative chemotherapy of advanced gastric cancer. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and tolerability of platinum versus non-platinum chemotherapy as first-line palliative treatment in patients with inoperable, advanced gastric cancer.MethodsRandomized phase II and III clinical trials on first-line palliative chemotherapy in inoperable, advanced gastric cancer were identified by electronic searches of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, and hand searches of relevant abstract books and reference lists. Response rates, overall survival, and toxicity were analyzed. Depending on whether new-generation agents (S-1, taxanes and irinotecan) were utilized, the non-platinum regimens were divided into two subgroup.ResultsCompared to non-platinum regimens containing new-generation agents, the use of platinum-based regimens was associated with better response (risk ratio (RR) = 1.94, 95%CI[1.48, 2.55], p<0.001), an increase of overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.85, 95%CI[0.78, 0.92], p<0.001), a higher risk of hematological and non-hematological toxicity. No statistically significant increase in response (RR = 1.03, 95%CI [0.85, 1.24], p = 0.76) or overall survival (HR = 1.07, 95%CI [0.88, 1.30], p = 0.49) was found when platinum therapies were compared to new-generation agent based combination regimens. The toxicity of platinum-based regimens was significantly higher for hematologic toxicity, nausea and vomiting, and neurotoxicity, but not for diarrhea and toxic death rate.ConclusionNew-generation agent based combination regimens achieved similar response rate and overall survival as platinum-based therapy that had generally higher side effects. S-1, taxanes and irinotecan seemed to be valid options for patients with inoperable, advanced gastric cancer as first-line chemotherapy.