Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A prospective study of two isothermal amplification assays compared with real-time PCR, CCNA and toxigenic culture for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.


ABSTRACT: New molecular methods of detecting Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) provide the routine lab with a sensitive random access method to produce results that are available in a shorter time than traditional methods.In this prospective study a total of 989 stool specimens were tested over a period of 16 months in parallel using two isothermal amplification assays, AmpliVue® (Quidel) and Illumigene® (Meridian) and the results compared to those from toxigenic culture. In addition all specimens were tested using a cytotoxic cell neutralisation assay (CCNA) and three different Real-time PCR targeting a C. difficile-specific 16S rDNA sequence or the toxin genes tcdA, tcdB/tcdB027 or cdtB.AmpliVue® was positive in 242 (24.5%) and Illumigene® in 228 (23.1%) specimens. 167 (16.9%) specimens were positive in toxigenic culture. Real-time-tcdA and -tcdB PCR was positive in 211 (21.3%) specimens, Real-time-cdtB PCR was positive in 101 (10.2%) specimens and C. difficile-PCR (16S rDNA) in 267 (27.0%) specimens.The respective sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value compared to toxigenic culture were 91, 89, 62 and 98% for AmpliVue® and 91, 91, 67 and 98% for Illumigene®.

SUBMITTER: Neuendorf M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4751656 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

A prospective study of two isothermal amplification assays compared with real-time PCR, CCNA and toxigenic culture for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Neuendorf Martina M   Guadarrama-Gonzalez Raquel R   Lamik Birgit B   MacKenzie Colin R CR  

BMC microbiology 20160212


<h4>Background</h4>New molecular methods of detecting Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) provide the routine lab with a sensitive random access method to produce results that are available in a shorter time than traditional methods.<h4>Methods</h4>In this prospective study a total of 989 stool specimens were tested over a period of 16 months in parallel using two isothermal amplification assays, AmpliVue® (Quidel) and Illumigene® (Meridian) and the results compared to those from toxigenic cul  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3421499 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5704324 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5952185 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC269697 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC3729612 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC4216139 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4390698 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3911361 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7089266 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3826655 | biostudies-literature