Unknown

Dataset Information

Comparison of Exome and Genome Sequencing Technologies for the Complete Capture of Protein-Coding Regions.


ABSTRACT: For next-generation sequencing technologies, sufficient base-pair coverage is the foremost requirement for the reliable detection of genomic variants. We investigated whether whole-genome sequencing (WGS) platforms offer improved coverage of coding regions compared with whole-exome sequencing (WES) platforms, and compared single-base coverage for a large set of exome and genome samples. We find that WES platforms have improved considerably in the last years, but at comparable sequencing depth, WGS outperforms WES in terms of covered coding regions. At higher sequencing depth (95x-160x), WES successfully captures 95% of the coding regions with a minimal coverage of 20x, compared with 98% for WGS at 87-fold coverage. Three different assessments of sequence coverage bias showed consistent bia

SUBMITTER: Lelieveld SH 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4755152 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Sorry, this publication's infomation has not been loaded in the Indexer, please go directly to PUBMED or Altmetric.

Similar Datasets