A robust prognostic gene expression signature for early stage lung adenocarcinoma.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Krzystanek M
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4761211 | biostudies-literature | 2016
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
A robust prognostic gene expression signature for early stage lung adenocarcinoma.
Krzystanek Marcin M Moldvay Judit J Szüts David D Szallasi Zoltan Z Eklund Aron Charles AC
Biomarker research 20160219
<h4>Background</h4>Stage I lung adenocarcinoma is usually not treated with adjuvant chemotherapy; however, around half of these patients do not survive 5 years. Therefore, a reliable prognostic biomarker for early stage patients would be critical to identify those most likely to benefit from early additional treatments. Several studies have searched for gene expression prognostic biomarkers for lung adenocarcinoma, but these have not yielded a widely accepted prognosticator.<h4>Results</h4>We an ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundThe incidence of stage I and stage II lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is likely to increase with the introduction of annual screening programs for high-risk individuals. We aimed to identify a reliable prognostic signature with immune-related genes that can predict prognosis and help making individualized management for patients with early-stage LUAD.MethodsThe public LUAD cohorts were obtained from the large-scale databases including 4 microarray data sets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and 1 RNA-seq data set from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) LUAD cohort. Only early-stage patients with clinical information were included. Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed to identify the candidate prognostic genes in GSE30219, GSE31210 and GSE50081 (training set). The prognostic signature was developed using the overlapped prognostic genes based on a risk score method. Kaplan-Meier curve with log-rank test and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to evaluate the prognostic value and performance of this signature, respectively. Furthermore, the robustness of this prognostic signature was further validated in TCGA-LUAD and GSE72094 cohorts.ResultsA prognostic immune signature consisting of 21 immune-related genes was constructed using the training set. The prognostic signature significantly stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups in terms of overall survival (OS) in training data set, including GSE30219 (HR = 4.31, 95% CI 2.29-8.11; P = 6.16E-06), GSE31210 (HR = 11.91, 95% CI 4.15-34.19; P = 4.10E-06), GSE50081 (HR = 3.63, 95% CI 1.90-6.95; P = 9.95E-05), the combined data set (HR = 3.15, 95% CI 1.98-5.02; P = 1.26E-06) and the validation data set, including TCGA-LUAD (HR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.49-3.13; P = 4.54E-05) and GSE72094 (HR = 2.95, 95% CI 1.86-4.70; P = 4.79E-06). Multivariate cox regression analysis demonstrated that the 21-gene signature could serve as an independent prognostic factor for OS after adjusting for other clinical factors. ROC curves revealed that the immune signature achieved good performance in predicting OS for early-stage LUAD. Several biological processes, including regulation of immune effector process, were enriched in the immune signature. Moreover, the combination of the signature with tumor stage showed more precise classification for prognosis prediction and treatment design.ConclusionsOur study proposed a robust immune-related prognostic signature for estimating overall survival in early-stage LUAD, which may be contributed to make more accurate survival risk stratification and individualized clinical management for patients with early-stage LUAD.
| S-EPMC7542703 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: The current staging system is imprecise for prognostic prediction of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to develop a robust prognostic signature for early-stage NSCLC, allowing classification of patients with a high risk of poor outcome and specific treatment decision. Method: In the present study, a comprehensive genome-wide profiling analysis was conducted using a retrospective pool of early-stage NSCLC patient data from the previous datasets of Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) including GSE31210, GSE37745, and GSE50081 and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Cox proportional hazards models were implemented to determine the association between gene expression levels and overall patient survival in each dataset. The common genes among all datasets were selected as candidate prognostic genes. A risk score model was developed and validated using four independent datasets and the entire cohort. The Kaplan-Meier with log-rank test was used to assess survival difference. Results: A univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for each dataset showed that a total of 2280 genes in GSE31210, 762 genes in GSE37745, 871 genes in GSE50081, and 666 genes in TCGA were identified as candidate protective genes, while overall 2131 genes in GSE31210, 913 in GSE37745, 1107 in GSE50081, and 997 in TCGA were identified as candidate risky genes. There were 8 common genes associated with overall survival, including 7 mRNA and 1 lncRNA. By using the Step-wise multivariate Cox analysis, an 8-gene prognostic signature (CDCP1, HMMR, TPX2, CIRBP, HLF, KBTBD7, SEC24B-AS1, and SH2B1) for early-stage NSCLC was developed. Patients in the high-risk group had shorter overall survival than those in the low-risk group. Multivariate regression and stratified analysis suggested that the prognostic power of the 8-gene signature was independent of other clinical factors. Furthermore, the 8-gene signature achieved AUC values of 0.726, 0.701, 0.725 and 0.650 in GSE31210, GSE37745, GSE50081 and TCGA, respectively. Moreover, the combination of the 8-gene signature and the stage resulted to a better patient classification for survival prediction and treatment decision. Conclusion: This study developed a robust gene signature with great value for prognostic prediction in early-stage NSCLC, which may contribute to patient classification and personalized treatment decisions.
| S-EPMC6684755 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The outcomes of patients treated with surgery for early stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are variable with median survival ranging from 6 months to more than 5 years. This challenge underscores an unmet need for developing personalized medicine strategies to refine the current treatment decision-making process. To derive a prognostic gene signature for patients with early stage PDAC, a PDAC cohort from Moffitt Cancer Center (n = 63) was used with overall survival (OS) as the primary endpoint. This was further evaluated using an independent microarray cohort dataset (Stratford et al: n = 102). Technical validation was performed by NanoString platform. A prognostic 15-gene signature was developed and showed a statistically significant association with OS in the Moffitt cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.26; p<0.001) and Stratford et al cohort (HR = 2.07; p = 0.02), and was independent of other prognostic variables. Moreover, integration of the signature with the TNM staging system improved risk prediction (p<0.01 in both cohorts). In addition, NanoString validation showed that the signature was robust with a high degree of reproducibility and the association with OS remained significant in the two cohorts. The gene signature could be a potential prognostic tool to allow risk-adapted stratification of PDAC patients into personalized treatment protocols; possibly improving the currently poor clinical outcomes of these patients.
| S-EPMC4527782 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeNew prognostic markers to guide treatment decisions in early stage non-small cell lung cancer are necessary to improve patient outcomes. In this report, we assess the utility of a predefined mRNA expression signature of cell-cycle progression genes (CCP score) to define 5-year risk of lung cancer-related death in patients with early stage lung adenocarcinoma.Experimental designA CCP score was calculated from the mRNA expression levels of 31 proliferation genes in stage I and stage II tumor samples from two public microarray datasets [Director's Consortium (DC) and GSE31210]. The same gene set was tested by quantitative PCR in 381 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) primary tumors. Association of the CCP score with outcome was assessed by Cox proportional hazards analysis.ResultsIn univariate analysis, the CCP score was a strong predictor of cancer-specific survival in both the Director's Consortium cohort (P = 0.00014; HR = 2.08; 95% CI, 1.43-3.02) and GSE31210 (P = 0.0010; HR = 2.25; 95% CI, 1.42-3.56). In multivariate analysis, the CCP score remained the dominant prognostic marker in the presence of clinical variables (P = 0.0022; HR = 2.02; 95% CI, 1.29-3.17 in Director's Consortium, P = 0.0026; HR = 2.16; 95% CI, 1.32-3.53 in GSE31210). On a quantitative PCR platform, the CCP score maintained highly significant prognostic value in FFPE-derived mRNA from clinical samples in both univariate (P = 0.00033; HR = 2.10; 95% CI, 1.39-3.17) and multivariate analyses (P = 0.0071; HR = 1.92; 95% CI, 1.18-3.10).ConclusionsThe CCP score is a significant predictor of lung cancer death in early stage lung adenocarcinoma treated with surgery and may be a valuable tool in selecting patients for adjuvant treatment.
| S-EPMC3834029 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Prognostic tests for patients with early-stage lung cancer may provide needed guidance on postoperative surveillance and therapeutic decisions. We used a novel strategy to develop and validate a prognostic classifier for early-stage lung cancer. Specifically, we focused on 42 genes with roles in lung cancer or cancer prognosis. Expression of these biologically relevant genes and their association with relapse-free survival (RFS) were evaluated using microarray data from 148 patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma. Seven genes associated with RFS were further examined by quantitative reverse transcription PCR in 291 lung adenocarcinoma tissues from Japan, the United States, and Norway. Only BRCA1, HIF1A, DLC1, and XPO1 were each significantly associated with prognosis in the Japan and US/Norway cohorts. A Cox regression-based classifier was developed using these four genes on the Japan cohort and validated in stage I lung adenocarcinoma from the US/Norway cohort and three publicly available lung adenocarcinoma expression profiling datasets. The results suggest that the classifier is robust across ethnically and geographically diverse populations regardless of the technology used to measure gene expression. We evaluated the combination of the four-gene classifier with miRNA miR-21 (MIR21) expression and found that the combination improved associations with prognosis, which were significant in stratified analyses on stage IA and stage IB patients. Thus, the four coding gene classifier, alone or with miR-21 expression, may provide a clinically useful tool to identify high-risk patients and guide recommendations regarding adjuvant therapy and postoperative surveillance of patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma.
| S-EPMC6503978 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-DIXA-D-1034 | biostudies-other
Project description:RNA modifications implicate pathological and prognosis significance in cancer development and progression, of which, m6A and m5C are representative regulators. These RNA modifications could produce effects on the function of other RNA by regulating gene expression. Thus, in this study, we aimed to explore the correlation between m6A/m5C regulators and early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Only the early-stage LUAD samples were included in this investigation, and the RNA-seq dataset of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort was utilized to evaluate the expression of 37 m6A/m5C regulated genes. Based on the expression level of these 37 genes, early-stage LUAD patients were divided into 2 clusters, which were performed by consensus clustering, and the m6A/m5C subtypes had significantly different prognostic outcomes (p < 0.001). Cluster1, which has a better prognosis, was characterized by the C3 (inflammatory) immune subtype, low immune infiltration, chemokine expression, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) expression, and immune checkpoint molecule expression. Furthermore, compared with cluster1, cluster2 showed a T cell exhaustion state, characterized by a high expression of immune checkpoint genes, and immune cells, such as T cells, CD8+ T cells, cytotoxic lymphocytes, NK cells, and so on. In addition, patients in cluster2 were with high tumor mutational burden (TMB) and numerous significant mutated oncogene and tumor suppressor genes, such as WNT10B, ERBB4, SMARCA4, TP53, and CDKN2A (p < 0.001). A total of 19 genes were mostly related to the prognosis of LUAD and were upregulated in cluster2 (p < 0.05), showing a positive correlation with the mRNA expression of 37 m6A/m5C regulated genes. The predictive risk model was constructed using Cox and LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) regression analysis. Finally, a seven-gene m6A/m5C risk model, comprising of METTL3, NPLOC4, RBM15, YTHDF1, IGF2BP1, NSUN3, and NSUN7, was constructed to stratify the prognosis of early-stage LUAD (p = 0.0049, AUC = 0.791). The high-risk score was associated with a poorer prognosis. This model was also validated using two additional GEO datasets: GSE72094 (p = 0.011, AUC = 0.736) and GSE50081 (p = 0.012, AUC = 0.628). In summary, it was established that the m6A/m5C-regulated genes performed a crosstalk function in the mRNA expression of early-stage LUAD. By interacting with other mRNA genes, m6A/m5C modification disturbs DNA replication and the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). The seven-gene risk model may be a critical tool for the prognostic assessment of early-stage LUAD.
| S-EPMC10095361 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Affordable early screening in subjects with high risk of lung cancer has great potential to improve survival from this deadly disease. We measured gene expression from lung tissue and peripheral whole blood (PWB) from adenocarcinoma cases and controls to identify dysregulated lung cancer genes that could be tested in blood to improve identification of at-risk patients in the future. Genome-wide mRNA expression analysis was conducted in 153 subjects (73 adenocarcinoma cases, 80 controls) from the Environment And Genetics in Lung cancer Etiology (EAGLE) study using PWB and paired snap-frozen tumor and non-involved lung tissue samples. Analyses were conducted using unpaired t-tests, linear mixed effects and ANOVA models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was computed to assess the predictive accuracy of the identified biomarkers. We identified 50 dysregulated genes in stage I adenocarcinoma versus control PWB samples (False Discovery Rate ≤0.1, fold change ≥1.5 or ≤0.66). Among them, eight (TGFBR3, RUNX3, TRGC2, TRGV9, TARP, ACP1, VCAN, and TSTA3) differentiated paired tumor versus non-involved lung tissue samples in stage I cases, suggesting a similar pattern of lung cancer-related changes in PWB and lung tissue. These results were confirmed in two independent gene expression analyses in a blood-based case-control study (n=212) and a tumor-non tumor paired tissue study (n=54). The eight genes discriminated patients with lung cancer from healthy controls with high accuracy (AUC=0.81, 95% CI=0.74-0.87). Our finding suggests the use of gene expression from PWB for the identification of early detection markers of lung cancer in the future. Samples from 164 subjects were initially included in the study. Two samples with poor quality profile based on quality assessment (described in Supplemental Material 2) were excluded before normalization. The remaining 162 samples were processed and normalized with the Robust Multichip Average (RMA) method. Nine additional subjects were excluded after data normalization because of reclassification to non-adenocarcinoma morphology during histologic review. The final analyses were based on 73 adenocarcinoma cases and 80 controls. All 22,277 probe sets based on RMA summary measures were used in the analyses.
| S-ECPF-GEOD-20189 | biostudies-other
Project description:Although several prognostic signatures have been developed in lung cancer, their application in clinical practice has been limited because they have not been validated in multiple independent data sets. Moreover, the lack of common genes between the signatures makes it difficult to know what biological process may be reflected or measured by the signature. By using classical data exploration approach with gene expression data from patients with lung adenocarcinoma (n = 186), we uncovered two distinct subgroups of lung adenocarcinoma and identified prognostic 193-gene gene expression signature associated with two subgroups. The signature was validated in 4 independent lung adenocarcinoma cohorts, including 556 patients. In multivariate analysis, the signature was an independent predictor of overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 4.8; p = 0.01). An integrated analysis of the signature revealed that E2F1 plays key roles in regulating genes in the signature. Subset analysis demonstrated that the gene signature could identify high-risk patients in early stage (stage I disease), and patients who would have benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. Thus, our study provided evidence for molecular basis of clinically relevant two distinct two subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma.
| S-EPMC3436895 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIncreasing evidence has demonstrated that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play a crucial part in maintaining genomic instability. We therefore identified genome instability-related lncRNAs and constructed a prediction signature for early stage lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) as well in order for classification of high-risk group of patients and improvement of individualized therapies.MethodsEarly stage LUAD RNA-seq and clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were randomly divided into training set (n = 177) and testing set (n = 176). A total of 146 genomic instability-associated lncRNAs were identified based on somatic mutation profiles combining lncRNA expression profiles from TCGA by the "limma R" package. We performed Cox regression analysis to develop this predictive indicator. We validated the prognostic signature by an external independent LUAD cohort with microarray platform acquired from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO).ResultsA genome instability-related six-lncRNA-based gene signature (GILncSig) was established to divide subjects into high-risk and low-risk groups with different outcomes at statistically significant levels. According to the multivariate Cox regression and stratification analysis, the GILncSig was an independent predictive factor. Furthermore, the six-lncRNA signature achieved AUC values of 0.745, 0.659, and 0.708 in the training set, testing set, and TCGA set, respectively. When compared with other prognostic lncRNA signatures, the GILncSig also exhibited better prediction performance.ConclusionThe prognostic lncRNA signature is a potent tool for risk stratification of early stage LUAD patients. Our study also provided new insights for identifying genome instability-related cancer biomarkers.
| S-EPMC8324209 | biostudies-literature