Dataset Information

A comparative study between limb-salvage and amputation for treating osteosarcoma.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Osteosarcoma is an aggressive malignant neoplasm, and conflicting findings have been reported on the survival and function recovery in osteosarcoma patients experiencing limb salvage or amputation. In the present study, we compared clinical outcomes regarding limb salvage surgery vs. amputation for osteosarcoma patients by a meta-analysis.

Method

Literature search was conducted in CNKI, Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Database, and Web of Sciences, and the quality of included studies was evaluated based on Newcastle-Ottawa scale quality assessment. Odds ratio and 95% confidence interval of the local recurrence, 5-year overall survival, and metastasis occurrence were calculated.

Results

17 articles were included according to selection criteria. There were 1343 patients in total derived from these studies. Our result showed that there was no significant difference between limb salvage surgery and amputation with respect to local recurrence, and patients with limb salvage surgery had a higher 5-year overall survival, and a lower metastasis occurrence.

Conclusions

The present study provided more comprehensive evidences to support limb salvage surgery as an optimal treatment of osteosarcoma patients.

SUBMITTER: Li X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4782023 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A comparative study between limb-salvage and amputation for treating osteosarcoma.

Li Xiaojuan X Zhang Ya Y Wan Shanshan S Li Huiling H Li Dongqi D Xia Junfeng J Yuan Zhongqin Z Ren Mingyan M Yu Shunling S Li Su S Yang Yihao Y Han Lei L Yang Zuozhang Z

Journal of bone oncology 20160123 1

<h4>Purpose</h4>Osteosarcoma is an aggressive malignant neoplasm, and conflicting findings have been reported on the survival and function recovery in osteosarcoma patients experiencing limb salvage or amputation. In the present study, we compared clinical outcomes regarding limb salvage surgery vs. amputation for osteosarcoma patients by a meta-analysis.<h4>Method</h4>Literature search was conducted in CNKI, Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Database, and Web of Sciences, and the quality of include ...[more]

PMID: 26998422

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeThis study sought to measure and identify factors associated with satisfaction with care among veterans. The metrics were colelcted for those receiving prosthetic limb care at the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and US Department of Defense (DoD) care settings and at community-based care providers.MethodsA longitudinal cohort of veterans with major upper limb amputation receiving any VA care from 2010 to 2015 were interviewed by phone twice, 1 year apart. Care satisfaction was measured by the Orthotics and Prosthetics User's Survey (OPUS) client satisfaction survey (CSS), and prosthesis satisfaction was measured by the OPUS client satisfaction with device (CSD), and the Trinity Amputation and Prosthetic Experience Scale satisfaction scales. The Quality of Care index, developed for this study, assessed care quality. Bivariate analyses and multivariable linear regressions identified factors associated with CSS. Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney rank tests and Fisher exact tests compared CSS and Quality of Care items at follow-up for those with care within and outside of the VA and DoD.ResultsThe study included 808 baseline participants and 585 follow-up participants. Device satisfaction and receipt of amputation care in the prior year were associated with greater satisfaction with care quality. Persons with bilateral amputation were significantly less satisfied with wait times. Veterans who received amputation care in the VA or DoD had better, but not statistically different, mean (SD) CSS scores: 31.6 (22.6) vs 39.4 (16.9), when compared with those who received care outside the VA or DoD. Those with care inside the VA or DoD were also more likely to have a functional assessment in the prior year (33.7% vs 7.1%, P = .06), be contacted by providers (42.7% vs 18.8%, P = .07), and receive amputation care information (41.6% vs 0%, P =.002). No statistically significant differences in CSS, Quality of Care scores, or pain measures were observed between baseline and follow-up. In regression models, those with higher CSD scores and with prior year amputation care had higher satisfaction when compared to those who had not received care.ConclusionsSatisfaction with prosthetic limb care is associated with device satisfaction and receipt of care within the prior year. Veterans receiving amputation care within the VA or DoD received better care quality scores than those receiving prosthetic care outside of the VA or DoD. Satisfaction with care and quality of care were stable over the 12 months of this study. Findings from this study can serve as benchmarks for future work on care satisfaction and quality of amputation rehabilitative care.

Project description:AbstractLower limb amputation (LLA) is still a health issue requiring rehabilitation and long-term care even in industrial societies. Several studies on subjects with LLA have been focused on the efficacy of rehabilitation and factors influencing the use of prosthesis. However, literature data on the recovery of ability to walk outdoors, and thus to participate in social life in this population is limited.To investigate potential correlations between socio-demographic and clinical factors, and the use of the prosthesis for indoor and/or outdoor walking referred to as community ambulation (CA) in subjects with LLA.An observational cohort study on 687 LLA subjects was conducted. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of 302 subjects who received similar rehabilitative treatment with respect to the standard protocol were collected by a telephone survey with a structured questionnaire. The CA recovery, in terms of patient's autonomy and participation, assessed by Walking Handicap Scale, was considered as the main outcome.The univariate analysis demonstrated statistical significant positive correlation between CA and gender (χ2 = 3.901, P = .048); amputation level (χ2 = 24.657, P < .001); pre-LLA (χ2 = 6.338, P = .012) and current work activity (χ2 = 25.192, P < .001); prosthesis use (χ2 = 187.037, P < .01); and time from LLA (r = 0.183, P < .001); increasing age was negatively correlated with the outcome (r = -0.329, P < .001), while pain intensity was not significant. Being male (75.4%); trans-tibial (TT) amputation level (9.79%); working before (3.81%) and after LLA (7.68%); and the prosthesis use (24.63%) increased the probability of CA recovery. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis confirmed that the prosthesis use (P < .001) and TT amputation level (P = .042) are predictors of a positive outcome (Walking Handicap Scale 4-6).These findings highlight the importance of the use of prosthesis in people with LLA for the restoration of a good capacity of participation (CA), especially in subjects with TT amputation level. The identification of predictive factors may help tailor-made rehabilitation approaches addressing an earlier reintegration to social life.

Project description:To explore patient experiences, understanding and perceptions of analgesia following major lower limb amputation. Qualitative interview study, conducted as part of a randomised controlled feasibility trial. Participants were recruited from two general hospitals in South Wales. Interview participants were patients enrolled in PLACEMENT (Perineural Local Anaesthetic Catheter aftEr Major lowEr limb amputatioN Trial): a randomised controlled feasibility trial comparing the use of perineural catheter (PNC) versus standard care for postoperative pain relief following major lower limb amputation. PLACEMENT participants who completed 5-day postoperative follow-up, were able and willing to participate in a face-to-face interview, and had consented to be contacted, were eligible to take part in the qualitative study. A total of 20 interviews were conducted with 14 participants: 10 male and 4 female. Semi-structured, face-to-face interviews were conducted with participants over two time points: (1) up to 1 month and (2) at least 6 months following amputation. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a framework approach. Interviews revealed unanticipated benefits of PNC usage for postoperative pain relief. Participants valued the localised and continuous nature of this mode of analgesia in comparison to opioids. Concerns about opioid dependence and side effects of pain relief medication were raised by participants in both treatment groups, with some reporting trying to limit their intake of analgesics. Findings suggest routine placement of a PNC following major lower limb amputation could reduce postoperative pain, particularly for patient groups at risk of postoperative delirium. This method of analgesic delivery also has the potential to reduce preoperative anxiety, alleviate the burden of pain management and minimise opioid use. Future research could further examine the comparison between patient-controlled analgesia and continuous analgesia in relation to patient anxiety and satisfaction with pain management. ISRCTN: 85710690; EudraCT: 2016-003544-37.

Dataset Information

A comparative study between limb-salvage and amputation for treating osteosarcoma.

Purpose

Method

Results

Conclusions

Publications

A comparative study between limb-salvage and amputation for treating osteosarcoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets