Dataset Information

Free-living cross-comparison of two wearable monitors for sleep and physical activity in healthy young adults.

ABSTRACT: There is a growing need for free-living monitoring of the full 24 h spectrum of behaviors with a single or integrated set of sensors. The validity of field standard wearable monitors in sleep and physical activity have yet to be assessed for the complementary behavior in the context of 24 h continuous monitoring. We conducted a free-living comparison study of the Actigraph GT3X+ (GT3X+) to assess sleep parameters as compared with the Actiwatch-64 (AW-64) and concurrently, the AW-64 to assess sedentary and physical activity behaviors as compared with the GT3X+. Thirty young adults (15 female, 19.2±0.86 years) wore both monitors for 3 consecutive days and 2 consecutive nights. Agreement of sleep, sedentary, and physical activity metrics were evaluated using analyses of variance, intraclass correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots with associated confidence limits, mean absolute percentage of errors and equivalence tests. For sleep, the GT3X+ showed high agreement for total sleep time and sleep efficiency, but underestimated wakefulness after sleep onset and sleep onset latency relative to the AW-64. For sedentary behavior and physical activity, the AW-64 showed a moderate agreement for activity energy expenditure, but not for sedentary, light or moderate-vigorous physical activities relative to the GT3X+. Overall our results showed good agreement of the GT3X+ with AW-64 for assessing sleep but a lack of agreement between AW-64 and GT3X+ for physical activity and sedentary behaviors. These results are likely due to the monitor placement (wrist vs hip), as well as the algorithm employed to score the data. Future validation work of existing and emerging technologies that may hold promise for 24 h continuous monitoring is needed.

SUBMITTER: Cellini N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4783247 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Free-living cross-comparison of two wearable monitors for sleep and physical activity in healthy young adults.

Cellini Nicola N McDevitt Elizabeth A EA Mednick Sara C SC Buman Matthew P MP

Physiology & behavior 20160125

There is a growing need for free-living monitoring of the full 24 h spectrum of behaviors with a single or integrated set of sensors. The validity of field standard wearable monitors in sleep and physical activity have yet to be assessed for the complementary behavior in the context of 24 h continuous monitoring. We conducted a free-living comparison study of the Actigraph GT3X+ (GT3X+) to assess sleep parameters as compared with the Actiwatch-64 (AW-64) and concurrently, the AW-64 to assess sed ...[more]

PMID: 26821185

Similar Datasets

Project description:Introduction: Understanding determinants of community mobility disability is critical for developing interventions aimed at preventing or delaying disability in older adults. In an effort to understand these determinants, capturing and measuring community mobility has become a key factor. The objectives of this paper are to present and illustrate the signal processing workflow and outcomes that can be extracted from an activity and community mobility measurement approach based on GPS and accelerometer sensor data and 2) to explore the construct validity of the proposed measurement approach using data collected from healthy older adults in free-living conditions. Methods: Personal, functional impairment and environmental variables were obtained by self-report questionnaires in 75 healthy community-living older adults (mean age = 66 ± 7 years old) living on the island of Montreal, QC, Canada. Participants wore, for 14 days during waking hours on the hip, a data logger incorporating a GPS receiver with a 3-axis accelerometer. Time at home ratio (THR), Trips out (TO), Destinations (D), Maximal distance of destinations (MDD), Active time ratio (ATR), Steps (S), Distance in a vehicle (DV), Time in a vehicle (TV), Distance on foot (DF), Time on foot (TF), Ellipse area (EA), and Ellipse maximum distance (EMD) were extracted from the recordings. Results: After applying quality control criteria, the original data set was reduced from 75 to 54 participants (28% attrition). Results from the remaining sample show that under free-living conditions in healthy older adults, location, activity and community mobility outcomes vary across individuals and certain personal variables (age, income, living situation, professional status, vehicle access) have potential mitigating effects on these outcomes. There was a significant (yet small) relationship (rho < 0.40) between self-reported life space and MDD, DV, EA, and EMD. Conclusion: Wearability and usability of the devices used to capture free-living community mobility impact participant compliance and the quality of the data. The construct validity of the proposed approach appears promising but requires further studies directed at populations with mobility impairments.

Project description:Background: Physical activity (PA) is essential in stroke rehabilitation of hemiparetic patients to avoid health risks, and moderate to vigorous PA could promote patients' recovery. However, PA assessments are limited to clinical environments. Little is known about PA in unguided free-living. Wearable sensors could reveal patients' PA during rehabilitation, and day-long long-term measurements over several weeks might reveal recovery trends of affected and less-affected body sides. Methods: We investigated PA in an observation study during outpatient rehabilitation in a day-care center. PA of affected and less-affected body sides, including upper and lower limbs were derived using wearable motion sensors. In this analysis we focused on PA during free-living and clinician guided therapies, and investigated differences between body-sides. Linear regressions were used to estimate metabolic equivalents for each limb at comparable scale. Non-parametric statistics were derived to quantify PA differences between body sides. Results: We analyzed 102 full-day movement data recordings from eleven hemiparetic patients during individual rehabilitation periods up to 79 days. The comparison between free-living and clinician guided therapy showed on average 16.1 % higher PA in the affected arm during therapy and 5.3 % higher PA in the affected leg during therapy. Average differences between free-living and therapy in the less-affected side were below 4.5 %. Conclusion: We analyzed PA of patients with a hemiparesis in two distinct rehabilitation settings, including free-living and clinician guided therapies over several weeks and compared MET values of affected and less-affected body sides. In particular, we investigated PA using individual regression models for each limb. We demonstrated that wearable motion sensors provide insights in patient's PA during rehabilitation. Although, no clear PA trends were found, our analysis showed patients' tendency to sedentary behavior, confirming previous lab study results. Our PA analysis approach could be used beyond clinical rehabilitation to devise personalized patient and limb-specific exercise recommendations in future remote rehabilitation.

Dataset Information

Free-living cross-comparison of two wearable monitors for sleep and physical activity in healthy young adults.

Publications

Free-living cross-comparison of two wearable monitors for sleep and physical activity in healthy young adults.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets