Dataset Information

The Association of Insurance Status and Race With Transfers of Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Initially Evaluated at Level III and IV Trauma Centers.

ABSTRACT: To investigate the association of lack of insurance and African American race with the probability of transfer to level I/II trauma centers after evaluation in the emergency department of level III/IV trauma centers for traumatic brain injury (TBI).The influence of nonmedical factors on the disposition of TBI patients initially seen in less specialized institutions is debated.We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving TBI patients who were registered in the National Trauma Data Bank between 2009 and 2011. Regression methods were used to investigate the association of insurance status and race with the disposition of TBI patients evaluated in less specialized trauma centers.During the study period, there were 26,031 TBI patients who were registered in the National Trauma Data Bank and met inclusion criteria. Of these, 10,572 (35.9%) were transferred to a higher level of care institution. Multivariable logistic regression after coarsened exact matching demonstrated an association of uninsured patients with an increased possibility of transfer (odds ratio [OR] = 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.42). On the contrary, there was no association of African Americans with transfers (OR = 1.27; 95% CI, 0.99-1.62). Those with Glasgow Coma Scale score above 8 (OR = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.08-1.39) or Injury Severity Score below 16 (OR = 1.33; 95% CI, 1.13-1.56) had a higher possibility of transfer.In TBI patients, lack of insurance was associated with an increased possibility of transfer to higher level of care institutions after evaluation in a level III or IV trauma center emergency department. Regardless of insurance status, this transfer pattern was also observed for African Americans, but only for those with milder injuries.

SUBMITTER: Bekelis K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4788375 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Association of Insurance Status and Race With Transfers of Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Initially Evaluated at Level III and IV Trauma Centers.

Bekelis Kimon K Missios Symeon S Mackenzie Todd A TA

Annals of surgery 20150701 1

<h4>Objective</h4>To investigate the association of lack of insurance and African American race with the probability of transfer to level I/II trauma centers after evaluation in the emergency department of level III/IV trauma centers for traumatic brain injury (TBI).<h4>Background</h4>The influence of nonmedical factors on the disposition of TBI patients initially seen in less specialized institutions is debated.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving TBI patients who ...[more]

PMID: 26020113

Similar Datasets

Project description:Trauma is the leading cause of potential years of life lost before age 65 years in the United States. Timely care in a designated trauma center has been shown to reduce mortality by 25%. However, many severely injured patients are not transferred to trauma centers after initially being seen at non–trauma center emergency departments (EDs).To determine patient-level and hospital-level factors associated with the decision to admit rather than transfer severely injured patients who are initially seen at non–trauma center EDs and to ascertain whether insured patients are more likely to be admitted than transferred compared with uninsured patients.Retrospective analysis of the 2009 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. We included all ED encounters for major trauma (Injury Severity Score, >15) seen at non–trauma centers in patients aged 18 to 64 years. We excluded ED discharges and ED deaths. We quantified the absolute risk difference between admission vs transfer by insurance status, while adjusting for age, sex, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, weekend admission and month of visit, and urban vs rural status and median household income of the home zip code, as well as annual ED visit volume and teaching status and US region.Inpatient admission vs transfer to another acute care facility.In 2009, a total of 4513 observations from 636 non–trauma center EDs were available for analysis, representing a nationally weighted population of 19,312 non–trauma center ED encounters for major trauma. Overall, 54.5% in 2009 were admitted to the non–trauma center. Compared with patients without insurance, the adjusted absolute risk of admission vs transfer was 14.3% (95% CI, 9.2%-19.4%) higher for patients with Medicaid and 11.2% (95% CI, 6.9%-15.4%) higher for patients with private insurance. Other factors associated with admission vs transfer included severe abdominal injuries (risk difference, 15.9%; 95% CI, 9.4%-22.3%), urban teaching hospital vs non–teaching hospital (risk difference, 26.2%; 95% CI, 15.2%-37.2%), and annual ED visit volume (risk difference, 3.4%; 95% CI, 1.6%-5.3% higher for every additional 10,000 annual ED visits).Patients with severe injuries initially evaluated at non–trauma center EDs were less likely to be transferred if insured and were at risk of receiving suboptimal trauma care. Efforts in monitoring and optimizing trauma interhospital transfers and outcomes at the population level are warranted.

Project description:ObjectiveTo determine the incidence and risk factors of chronic critical illness after severe blunt trauma.DesignProspective observational cohort study (NCT01810328).SettingTwo level-one trauma centers in the United States.PatientsOne hundred thirty-five adult blunt trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock who survived beyond 48 hours after injury.InterventionsNone.Measurements and main resultsChronic critical illness was defined as an ICU stay lasting 14 days or more with evidence of persistent organ dysfunction. Three subjects (2%) died within the first 7 days, 107 (79%) exhibited rapid recovery and 25 (19%) progressed to chronic critical illness. Patients who developed chronic critical illness were older (55 vs 44-year-old; p = 0.01), had more severe shock (base deficit, -9.2 vs -5.5; p = 0.005), greater organ failure severity (Denver multiple organ failure score, 3.5 ± 2.4 vs 0.8 ± 1.1; p < 0.0001) and developed more infectious complications (84% vs 35%; p < 0.0001). Chronic critical illness patients were more likely to be discharged to a long-term care setting (56% vs 34%; p = 0.008) than to a rehabilitation facility/home. At 4 months, chronic critical illness patients had higher mortality (16.0% vs 1.9%; p < 0.05), with survivors scoring lower in general health measures (p < 0.005). Multivariate analysis revealed age greater than or equal to 55 years, systolic hypotension less than or equal to 70 mm Hg, transfusion greater than or equal to 5 units packed red blood cells within 24 hours, and Denver multiple organ failure score at 72 hours as independent predictors of chronic critical illness (area under the receiver operating curve, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95).ConclusionsAlthough early mortality is low after severe trauma, chronic critical illness is a common trajectory in survivors and is associated with poor long-term outcomes. Advancing age, shock severity, and persistent organ dysfunction are predictive of chronic critical illness. Early identification may facilitate targeted interventions to change the trajectory of this morbid phenotype.

Project description:BackgroundPersistent disparities in trauma in-hospital mortality owing to insurance status and race remain a prominent issue within healthcare. This study explores the relationships among insurance status, race, length of stay (LOS) in-hospital mortality outcomes in trauma patients at extreme risk of mortality (EROM) trauma patients.MethodsData was retrieved from the National Inpatient Sample, focusing on high-acuity trauma patients from 2007 to 2020, aged 18-64 years. Patients were identified using specific All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups codes. Emphasis was placed on those with EROM owing to their resource-intensive nature and the potential influence of insurance on outcomes. Patients aged 65 years or older were excluded owing to distinct trauma patterns, as were those diagnosed with burns or non-trauma conditions.ResultsThe study encompassed 70,381 trauma inpatients with EROM, representing a national estimate of 346,659. Being insured was associated with a 34% decrease in the odds of in-hospital mortality compared to being uninsured. The in-hospital mortality risk associated with insurance status varied over time, with insurance having no impact on in-hospital mortality during hospitalizations of less than 2 days (short LOS). In the overall group, Black patients showed an 8% lower risk of in-hospital mortality compared to White patients, while they experienced a 33% higher risk of in-hospital mortality during short LOS.ConclusionInsured trauma inpatients demonstrated a significant reduction in the odds of in-hospital mortality compared to their uninsured counterparts, although this advantage was not present in the short LOS group. Black patients experienced lower in-hospital mortality rates compared to White patients, but this trend reversed in the short LOS group. These findings underscore the intricate relationships between insurance status, race, and duration of hospitalization, highlighting the need for interventions to improve patient outcomes.

Project description:Study designSecondary overtriage is a burden to the medical system. Unnecessary transfers overload trauma centers, occupy emergency transfer resources, and delay definitive patient care. Craniomaxillofacial (CMF) trauma, especially in isolation, is a frequent culprit.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to assess the perspectives of facial trauma surgeons regarding the interfacility transfer of patients with isolated CMF trauma.MethodsA 31-item survey was developed using Likert-type scale and open-ended response systems. Internal consistency testing among facial trauma surgeons yielded a Cronbach's α calculation of .75. The survey was distributed anonymously to the American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, the North American Division of AO Craniomaxillofacial, and the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Statistical significance in response plurality was determined by nonoverlapping 99.9% confidence intervals (P < .001). Sum totals were reported as means with standard deviations and z scores with P values of less than .05 considered significant.ResultsThe survey yielded 196 responses. Seventy-seven percent of respondents did not believe that most isolated CMF transfers required emergency surgery and roughly half (49%) thought that most emergency transfers were unnecessary. Fifty-four percent of respondents agreed that most patients transferred could have been referred for outpatient management and 87% thought that transfer guidelines could help decrease unnecessary transfers. Twenty-seven percent of respondents had no pre-transfer communication with the referring facility. Perspectives on the transfer of specific fracture patterns and their presentations were also collected.ConclusionMost facial trauma surgeons in this study believe that emergent transfer for isolated CMF trauma is frequently unnecessary. Such injuries rarely require emergent surgery and can frequently be managed in the outpatient setting without activating emergency transfer services. The fracture-specific data collected are a representation of the national, multidisciplinary opinion of facial trauma surgeons and correlate with previously published data on which specific types of facial fractures are most often transferred unnecessarily. The results of this study can serve as the foundation for interfacility transfer guidelines, which may provide a valuable resource in triaging transfers and decreasing associated health-care costs.

Project description:BackgroundThe American College of Surgeons mandates universal screening for alcohol misuse and delivery of an intervention for those screening positive as a requirement for certification as a level 1 trauma center. Though this requirement has been mandated for over a decade, its implementation has been challenging. Our research team completed an implementation study supporting seven pediatric trauma centers' compliance with the requirement by developing and implementing an institutional alcohol Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) policy for adolescent trauma patients. A mixed-methods approach indicated that SBIRT adoption rates increased at all sites; however, providers' fidelity to the SBIRT intervention was variable, and providers reported a number of barriers to SBIRT implementation. The goal of this study is to conduct a fully powered type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial to test the effectiveness of a comprehensive implementation strategy in increasing the implementation of SBIRT for alcohol and other drug use (AOD) in pediatric trauma centers.MethodsOur implementation strategy is based on the Science to Service Laboratory (SSL), an approach developed by the SAMHSA-funded Addiction Technology Transfer Centers that consists of three core elements (i.e., didactic training + performance feedback + leadership coaching). Utilizing a stepped wedge design, a national cohort of 10 pediatric trauma centers will receive the SSL implementation strategy. At six distinct time points, each of the 10 sites will provide data from 30 electronic medical records (n = 1800 in total). A subset of adolescents will also report on fidelity of intervention delivery and linkage to care (i.e., continued AOD discussion and/or treatment with a primary care provider) 1 month after hospital discharge. In addition, nurses, social workers, and leaders will report on organizational readiness for implementation at four distinct time points.DiscussionThis protocol proposes a unique opportunity to examine whether a comprehensive implementation strategy can improve the fidelity of SBIRT delivery across a national cohort of pediatric trauma centers. With injured adolescents, this could optimize the detection and intervention of AOD use and improve adolescent health.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT03297060 .

Dataset Information

The Association of Insurance Status and Race With Transfers of Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Initially Evaluated at Level III and IV Trauma Centers.

Publications

The Association of Insurance Status and Race With Transfers of Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Initially Evaluated at Level III and IV Trauma Centers.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets