Atrioventricular and ventricular-to-ventricular programming in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from ALTITUDE.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves outcomes in patients with heart failure, yet response rates are variable. We sought to determine whether physician-specified CRT programming was associated with improved outcomes.Using data from the ALTITUDE remote follow-up cohort, we examined sensed atrioventricular (AV) and ventricular-to-ventricular (VV) programming and their associated outcomes in patients with de novo CRT from 2009-2010. Outcomes included arrhythmia burden, left ventricular (LV) pacing, and all-cause mortality at 4 years.We identified 5709 patients with de novo CRT devices; at the time of implant, 34% (n?=?1959) had entirely nominal settings programmed, 40% (n?=?2294) had only AV timing adjusted, 11% (n?=?604) had only VV timing adjusted, and 15% (n?=?852) had both AV and VV adjusted from nominal programming. Suboptimal LV pacing (<95%) during follow-up was similar across groups; however, the proportion with atrial fibrillation (AF) burden >5% was lowest in the AV-only adjusted group (17.9%) and highest in the nominal (27.7%) and VV-only adjusted (28.3%) groups. Adjusted all-cause mortality was significantly higher among patients with non-nominal AV delay >120 vs. <120 ms (adjusted heart rate (HR) 1.28, p?=?0.008) but similar when using the 180-ms cutoff (adjusted HR 1.13 for >180 vs. ?180 ms, p?=?0.4).Nominal settings for de novo CRT implants are frequently altered, most commonly the AV delay. There is wide variability in reprogramming. Patients with nominal or AV-only adjustments appear to have favorable pacing and arrhythmia outcomes. Sensed AV delays less than 120 ms are associated with improved survival.
SUBMITTER: Steinberg BA
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4795184 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA