Dataset Information

The Walking Speed Questionnaire: Assessing Walking Speed in a Self-reported Format.

ABSTRACT: The literature increasingly demonstrates the importance of gait speed (GS) in the frailty assessment of patients aged 60 years and older. Conventional GS measurement, however, maybe contraindicated in settings such as trauma where the patient is temporarily immobilized. We devised a Walking Speed Questionnaire (WSQ) to allow assessment of preinjury baseline GS, in meters per second, in a self-reported manner, to overcome the inability to directly test the patients' walking speed.Four questions comprise the WSQ, and were derived using previously published questionnaires and expert opinion of 6 physician-researchers.Four ambulatory clinics.Ambulating individuals aged 60-95 (mean age, 73.2 ± 8.1 years, 86.1% female, n = 101).Participants completed the WSQ and underwent GS measurement for comparison.WSQ score correlation to true GS, receiver operating characteristics, and validation statistics were performed.All 4 questions of the WSQ independently predicted true GS significantly (P < 0.001). The WSQ sufficiently predicted true GS with r = 0.696 and ? = 0.717.The WSQ is an effective tool for assessing baseline walking speed in patients aged 60 years and older in a self-reported manner. It permits gait screening in health care environments where conventional GS testing is contraindicated due to temporary immobilization and maybe used to provide baseline targets for goal-oriented post-trauma care. Given its ability to capture GS in patients who are unable to ambulate, it may open doors for frailty research in previously unattainable populations.Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

SUBMITTER: Cong GT

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4801662 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Walking Speed Questionnaire: Assessing Walking Speed in a Self-reported Format.

Cong Guang-Ting GT Cohn Matthew R MR Villa Jordan C JC Kerwin Lewis J LJ Rosen Natalie N Fang Xiu Zhen XZ Christos Paul J PJ Evrony Ayelet A Chen Jin J Torres Ashley A Lane Joseph M JM

Journal of orthopaedic trauma 20160401 4

<h4>Objectives</h4>The literature increasingly demonstrates the importance of gait speed (GS) in the frailty assessment of patients aged 60 years and older. Conventional GS measurement, however, maybe contraindicated in settings such as trauma where the patient is temporarily immobilized. We devised a Walking Speed Questionnaire (WSQ) to allow assessment of preinjury baseline GS, in meters per second, in a self-reported manner, to overcome the inability to directly test the patients' walking spe ...[more]

PMID: 26569186

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND: There is no validated gold-standard diagnostic support tool for LSS, and therefore an accurate diagnosis depends on clinical assessment. Assessment of the diagnostic value of the history of the patient requires an evaluation of the differences and overlap of symptoms of the radicular and cauda equina types; however, no tool is available for evaluation of the LSS category. We attempted to develop a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire as a diagnostic support tool for LSS using a clinical epidemiological approach. The aim of the present study was to use this tool to assess the diagnostic value of the history of the patient for categorization of LSS. METHODS: The initial derivation study included 137 patients with LSS and 97 with lumbar disc herniation who successfully recovered following surgical treatment. The LSS patients were categorized into radicular and cauda equina types based on history, physical examinations, and MRI. Predictive factors for overlapping symptoms between the two types and for cauda equina symptoms in LSS were derived by univariate analysis. A self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire (SSHQ) was developed based on these findings. A prospective derivation study was then performed in a series of 115 patients with LSS who completed the SSHQ before surgery. All these patients recovered following surgical treatment. The sensitivity of the SSHQ was calculated and clinical prediction rules for LSS were developed. A validation study was subsequently performed on 250 outpatients who complained of lower back pain with or without leg symptoms. The sensitivity and specificity of the SSHQ were calculated, and the test-retest reliability over two weeks was investigated in 217 patients whose symptoms remained unchanged. RESULTS: The key predictive factors for overlapping symptoms between the two categories of LSS were age > 50, lower-extremity pain or numbness, increased pain when walking, increased pain when standing, and relief of symptoms on bending forward (odds ratio > or = 2, p < 0.05). The key predictive factors for cauda equina type symptoms were numbness around the buttocks, walking almost causes urination, a burning sensation around the buttocks, numbness in the soles of both feet, numbness in both legs, and numbness without pain (odds ratio > or = 2, p < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of the SSHQ were 84% and 78%, respectively, in the validation data set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.797 in the derivation set and 0.782 in the validation data set. In the test-retest analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficient for the first and second tests was 85%. CONCLUSION: A new self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire was developed successfully as a diagnostic support tool for LSS.

Project description:BackgroundIn cohorts with voluntary participation, participants may not be representative of the underlying population, leading to distorted estimates. If the relevant sources of selective participation are observed, it is however possible to restore the representativeness by reweighting the sample to resemble the target population. So far, few studies in epidemiology have applied reweighting based on extensive register data on socio-demographics and disease history, or with self-reported data on health and health-related behaviors.MethodsWe examined selective participation at baseline and the first two follow-ups of the Scania Public Health Cohort (SPHC), a survey conducted in Southern Sweden in 1999/2000 (baseline survey; n = 13,581 participants, 58% participation rate), 2005 (first follow-up, n = 10,471), and 2010 (second follow-up; n = 9,026). Survey participants were reweighted to resemble the underlying population with respect to a broad range of socio-demographic, disease, and health-related characteristics, and we assessed how selective participation impacted the validity of associations between self-reported overall health and dimensions of socio-demographics and health.ResultsParticipants in the baseline and follow-up surveys were healthier and more likely to be female, born in Sweden, middle-aged, and have higher socioeconomic status. However, the differences were not very large. In turn, reweighting the samples to match the target population had generally small or moderate impacts on associations. Most examined regression coefficients changed by less than 20%, with virtually no changes in the directions of the effects.ConclusionOverall, selective participation with respect to the observed factors was not strong enough to substantially alter the associations with self-assessed health. These results are consistent with an interpretation that SPHC has high validity, perhaps reflective of a relatively high participation rate. Since validity must be determined on a case-by-case basis, however, researchers should apply the same method to other health cohorts to assess and potentially improve the validity.

Project description:To determine the degree to which self-selected walking speed (SSWS), maximal walking speed (MWS), and walking speed reserve (WSR) are associated with fall status among community-dwelling older adults.WS and 1-year falls history data were collected on 217 community-dwelling older adults (median age = 82, range 65-93 years) at a local outpatient PT clinic and local retirement communities and senior centers. WSR was calculated as a difference (WSRdiff = MWS - SSWS) and ratio (WSRratio = MWS/SSWS).SSWS (P < 0.001), MWS (P < 0.001), and WSRdiff (P < 0.01) were associated with fall status. The cutpoints identified were 0.76 m/s for SSWS (65.4% sensitivity, 70.9% specificity), 1.13 m/s for MWS (76.6% sensitivity, 60.0% specificity), and 0.24 m/s for WSRdiff (56.1% sensitivity, 70.9% specificity). SSWS and MWS better discriminated between fallers and non-fallers (SSWS: AUC = 0.69, MWS: AUC = 0.71) than WSRdiff (AUC = 0.64).SSWS and MWS seem to be equally informative measures for assessing fall status in community-dwelling older adults. Older adults with SSWSs less than 0.76 m/s and those with MWSs less than 1.13 m/s may benefit from further fall risk assessment. Combining SSWS and MWS to calculate an individual's WSR does not provide additional insight into fall status in this population.Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME CME OBJECTIVES:: Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: (1) Describe the different methods for calculating walking speed reserve and discuss the potential of the metric as an outcome measure; (2) Explain the degree to which self-selected walking speed, maximal walking speed, and walking speed reserve are associated with fall status among community-dwelling older adults; and (3) Discuss potential limitations to using walking speed reserve to identify fall status in populations without mobility restrictions.Advanced: The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this activity for a maximum of 1.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s). Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Dataset Information

The Walking Speed Questionnaire: Assessing Walking Speed in a Self-reported Format.

Publications

The Walking Speed Questionnaire: Assessing Walking Speed in a Self-reported Format.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets