Dataset Information

Secondary structure bias in generalized Born solvent models: comparison of conformational ensembles and free energy of solvent polarization from explicit and implicit solvation.

ABSTRACT: The effects of the use of three generalized Born (GB) implicit solvent models on the thermodynamics of a simple polyalanine peptide are studied via comparing several hundred nanoseconds of well-converged replica exchange molecular dynamics (REMD) simulations using explicit TIP3P solvent to REMD simulations with the GB solvent models. It is found that when compared to REMD simulations using TIP3P the GB REMD simulations contain significant differences in secondary structure populations, most notably an overabundance of alpha-helical secondary structure. This discrepancy is explored via comparison of the differences in the electrostatic component of the free energy of solvation (DeltaDeltaG(pol)) between TIP3P (via thermodynamic Integration calculations), the GB models, and an implicit solvent model based on the Poisson equation (PE). The electrostatic components of the solvation free energies are calculated using each solvent model for four representative conformations of Ala10. Since the PE model is found to have the best performance with respect to reproducing TIP3P DeltaDeltaG(pol) values, effective Born radii from the GB models are compared to effective Born radii calculated with PE (so-called perfect radii), and significant and numerous deviations in GB radii from perfect radii are found in all GB models. The effect of these deviations on the solvation free energy is discussed, and it is shown that even when perfect radii are used the agreement of GB with TIP3P DeltaDeltaG(pol) values does not improve. This suggests a limit to the optimization of the effective Born radius calculation and that future efforts to improve the accuracy of GB models must extend beyond such optimizations.

SUBMITTER: Roe DR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4810457 | biostudies-literature | 2007 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Secondary structure bias in generalized Born solvent models: comparison of conformational ensembles and free energy of solvent polarization from explicit and implicit solvation.

Roe Daniel R DR Okur Asim A Wickstrom Lauren L Hornak Viktor V Simmerling Carlos C

The journal of physical chemistry. B 20070127 7

The effects of the use of three generalized Born (GB) implicit solvent models on the thermodynamics of a simple polyalanine peptide are studied via comparing several hundred nanoseconds of well-converged replica exchange molecular dynamics (REMD) simulations using explicit TIP3P solvent to REMD simulations with the GB solvent models. It is found that when compared to REMD simulations using TIP3P the GB REMD simulations contain significant differences in secondary structure populations, most nota ...[more]

PMID: 17256983

Similar Datasets

Project description:The ion atmosphere around highly charged nucleic acid molecules plays a significant role in their dynamics, structure, and interactions. Here we utilized the implicit solvent framework to develop a model for the explicit treatment of ions interacting with nucleic acid molecules. The proposed explicit ions/implicit water model is based on a significantly modified generalized Born (GB) model and utilizes a non-standard approach to define the solute/solvent dielectric boundary. Specifically, the model includes modifications to the GB interaction terms for the case of multiple interacting solutes-disconnected dielectric boundary around the solute-ion or ion-ion pairs. A fully analytical description of all energy components for charge-charge interactions is provided. The effectiveness of the approach is demonstrated by calculating the potential of mean force for Na+-Cl- ion pair and by carrying out a set of Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of mono- and trivalent ions interacting with DNA and RNA duplexes. The monovalent (Na+) and trivalent (CoHex3+) counterion distributions predicted by the model are in close quantitative agreement with all-atom explicit water molecular dynamics simulations used as reference. Expressed in the units of energy, the maximum deviations of local ion concentrations from the reference are within k B T. The proposed explicit ions/implicit water GB model is able to resolve subtle features and differences of CoHex distributions around DNA and RNA duplexes. These features include preferential CoHex binding inside the major groove of the RNA duplex, in contrast to CoHex biding at the "external" surface of the sugar-phosphate backbone of the DNA duplex; these differences in the counterion binding patters were earlier shown to be responsible for the observed drastic differences in condensation propensities between short DNA and RNA duplexes. MC simulations of CoHex ions interacting with the homopolymeric poly(dA·dT) DNA duplex with modified (de-methylated) and native thymine bases are used to explore the physics behind CoHex-thymine interactions. The simulations suggest that the ion desolvation penalty due to proximity to the low dielectric volume of the methyl group can contribute significantly to CoHex-thymine interactions. Compared to the steric repulsion between the ion and the methyl group, the desolvation penalty interaction has a longer range and may be important to consider in the context of methylation effects on DNA condensation.

Project description:Adequate sampling of conformation space remains challenging in atomistic simulations, especially if the solvent is treated explicitly. Implicit-solvent simulations can speed up conformational sampling significantly. We compare the speed of conformational sampling between two commonly used methods of each class: the explicit-solvent particle mesh Ewald (PME) with TIP3P water model and a popular generalized Born (GB) implicit-solvent model, as implemented in the AMBER package. We systematically investigate small (dihedral angle flips in a protein), large (nucleosome tail collapse and DNA unwrapping), and mixed (folding of a miniprotein) conformational changes, with nominal simulation times ranging from nanoseconds to microseconds depending on system size. The speedups in conformational sampling for GB relative to PME simulations, are highly system- and problem-dependent. Where the simulation temperatures for PME and GB are the same, the corresponding speedups are approximately onefold (small conformational changes), between ∼1- and ∼100-fold (large changes), and approximately sevenfold (mixed case). The effects of temperature on speedup and free-energy landscapes, which may differ substantially between the solvent models, are discussed in detail for the case of miniprotein folding. In addition to speeding up conformational sampling, due to algorithmic differences, the implicit solvent model can be computationally faster for small systems or slower for large systems, depending on the number of solute and solvent atoms. For the conformational changes considered here, the combined speedups are approximately twofold, ∼1- to 60-fold, and ∼50-fold, respectively, in the low solvent viscosity regime afforded by the implicit solvent. For all the systems studied, 1) conformational sampling speedup increases as Langevin collision frequency (effective viscosity) decreases; and 2) conformational sampling speedup is mainly due to reduction in solvent viscosity rather than possible differences in free-energy landscapes between the solvent models.

Project description:Accurate yet efficient computational models of solvent environment are central for most calculations that rely on atomistic modeling, such as prediction of protein-ligand binding affinities. In this study, we evaluate the accuracy of a recently developed generalized Born implicit solvent model, GBNSR6 (Aguilar et al. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010, 6, 3613-3639), in estimating the electrostatic solvation free energies (ΔG(pol)) and binding free energies (ΔΔG(pol)) for small protein-ligand complexes. We also compare estimates based on three different explicit solvent models (TIP3P, TIP4PEw, and OPC). The two main findings are as follows. First, the deviation (RMSD = 7.04 kcal/mol) of GBNSR6 binding affinities from commonly used TIP3P reference values is comparable to the deviations between explicit models themselves, e.g. TIP4PEw vs TIP3P (RMSD = 5.30 kcal/mol). A simple uniform adjustment of the atomic radii by a single scaling factor reduces the RMS deviation of GBNSR6 from TIP3P to within the above "error margin" - differences between ΔΔG(pol) estimated by different common explicit solvent models. The simple radii scaling virtually eliminates the systematic deviation (ΔΔG(pol)) between GBNSR6 and two out of the three explicit water models and significantly reduces the deviation from the third explicit model. Second, the differences between electrostatic binding energy estimates from different explicit models is disturbingly large; for example, the deviation between TIP4PEw and TIP3P estimates of ΔΔG(pol) values can be up to ∼50% or ∼9 kcal/mol, which is significantly larger than the "chemical accuracy" goal of ∼1 kcal/mol. The absolute ΔG(pol) calculated with different explicit models could differ by tens of kcal/mol. These discrepancies point to unacceptably high sensitivity of binding affinity estimates to the choice of common explicit water models. The absence of a clear "gold standard" among these models strengthens the case for the use of accurate implicit solvation models for binding energetics, which may be orders of magnitude faster.

Dataset Information

Secondary structure bias in generalized Born solvent models: comparison of conformational ensembles and free energy of solvent polarization from explicit and implicit solvation.

Publications

Secondary structure bias in generalized Born solvent models: comparison of conformational ensembles and free energy of solvent polarization from explicit and implicit solvation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets