Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Binomial Mixture Model Based Association Testing to Account for Genetic Heterogeneity for GWAS.


ABSTRACT: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have confirmed the ubiquitous existence of genetic heterogeneity for common disease: multiple common genetic variants have been identified to be associated, while many more are yet expected to be uncovered. However, the single SNP (single-nucleotide polymorphism) based trend test (or its variants) that has been dominantly used in GWAS is based on contrasting the allele frequency difference between the case and control groups, completely ignoring possible genetic heterogeneity. In spite of the widely accepted notion of genetic heterogeneity, we are not aware of any previous attempt to apply genetic heterogeneity motivated methods in GWAS. Here, to explicitly account for unknown genetic heterogeneity, we applied a mixture model based single-SNP test to the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC) GWAS data with traits of Crohn's disease, bipolar disease, coronary artery disease, and type 2 diabetes, identifying much larger numbers of significant SNPs and risk loci for each trait than those of the popular trend test, demonstrating potential power gain of the mixture model based test.

SUBMITTER: Xu Z 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4814320 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Binomial Mixture Model Based Association Testing to Account for Genetic Heterogeneity for GWAS.

Xu Zhiyuan Z   Pan Wei W  

Genetic epidemiology 20160224 3


Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have confirmed the ubiquitous existence of genetic heterogeneity for common disease: multiple common genetic variants have been identified to be associated, while many more are yet expected to be uncovered. However, the single SNP (single-nucleotide polymorphism) based trend test (or its variants) that has been dominantly used in GWAS is based on contrasting the allele frequency difference between the case and control groups, completely ignoring possible ge  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3354651 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7743758 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6751797 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5736152 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5860182 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6290643 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5812649 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5714448 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3784826 | biostudies-literature