Dataset Information

Quantifying the Race Stratified Impact of Socioeconomics on Graft Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

ABSTRACT: Socioeconomic status (SES) is a significant determinant of health outcomes and may be an important component of the causal chain surrounding racial disparities in kidney transplantation. The social adaptability index (SAI) is a validated and quantifiable measure of SES, with a lack of studies analyzing this measure longitudinally or between races.Longitudinal cohort study in adult kidney transplantation transplanted at a single-center between 2005 and 2012. The SAI score includes 5 domains (employment, education, marital status, substance abuse and income), each with a minimum of 0 and maximum of 3 for an aggregate of 0 to 15 (higher score ? better SES).One thousand one hundred seventy-one patients were included; 624 (53%) were African American (AA) and 547 were non-AA. African Americans had significantly lower mean baseline SAI scores (AAs 6.5 vs non-AAs 7.8; P < 0.001). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that there was no association between baseline SAI and acute rejection in non-AAs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.81-1.05), whereas it was a significant predictor of acute rejection in AAs (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-0.99). Similarly, a 2-stage approach to joint modelling of time to graft loss and longitudinal SAI did not predict graft loss in non-AAs (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.28-3.62), whereas it was a significant predictor of graft loss in AAs (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.93).After controlling for confounders, SAI scores were associated with a lower risk of acute rejection and graft loss in AA kidney transplant recipients, whereas neither baseline nor follow-up SAI predicted outcomes in non-AA kidney transplant recipients.

SUBMITTER: Taber DJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4818195 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Quantifying the Race Stratified Impact of Socioeconomics on Graft Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Taber David J DJ Hamedi Mahsa M Rodrigue James R JR Gebregziabher Mulugeta G MG Srinivas Titte R TR Baliga Prabhakar K PK Egede Leonard E LE

Transplantation 20160701 7

<h4>Background</h4>Socioeconomic status (SES) is a significant determinant of health outcomes and may be an important component of the causal chain surrounding racial disparities in kidney transplantation. The social adaptability index (SAI) is a validated and quantifiable measure of SES, with a lack of studies analyzing this measure longitudinally or between races.<h4>Methods</h4>Longitudinal cohort study in adult kidney transplantation transplanted at a single-center between 2005 and 2012. The ...[more]

PMID: 26425875

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLong-term high-dose lithium therapy in bipolar disorder is known to adversely affect kidney function. However, recent animal studies have revealed that low amounts of lithium are beneficial for the kidney when it is damaged by exposure to nephrotoxic compounds, inflammation or oxidative stress. This study aimed to investigate whether urinary lithium excretion, reflecting dietary lithium intake, is associated with adverse long-term kidney graft outcomes and patient survival.MethodsUrinary lithium concentration was measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry in 642 stable kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Graft failure was defined as the start of dialysis or retransplantation and kidney function decline was defined as a doubling of serum creatinine.ResultsThe median urinary lithium excretion was 3.03 μmol/24 h [interquartile range (IQR) 2.31-4.01]. Urinary lithium excretion was associated with energy, plant protein and water intake. During a median follow-up of 5.3 years (IQR 4.5-6.0), 79 (12%) KTRs developed graft failure and 127 (20%) KTRs developed kidney function decline. Higher urinary lithium excretion was associated with a lower risk of graft failure {hazard ratio [HR] per doubling 0.54 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.79]} and kidney function decline [HR per doubling 0.73 (95% CI 0.54-0.99)]. These associations remained independent of adjustment for potential confounders and in sensitivity analyses. There was a significant effect modification with the use of proliferation inhibitors (P = .05) and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; P < .001), with higher urinary lithium excretion being more protective in KTRs not using proliferation inhibitors and in KTRs with lower baseline eGFR. Furthermore, higher urinary lithium excretion was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality [HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.49-0.83); P = .001].ConclusionDietary lithium intake may be a potentially modifiable, yet rather overlooked, risk factor for adverse long-term kidney graft outcomes and patient survival.Trial registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02811835.

Project description:Background:Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI; cyclosporine, tacrolimus) are critical for kidney transplant immunosuppression, but have multiple potential drug interactions, such as with macrolide antibiotics. Macrolide antibiotics (clarithromycin, erythromycin, and azithromycin) are often used to treat atypical infections. Clarithromycin and erythromycin inhibit CNI metabolism and increase the risk of CNI nephrotoxicity, while azithromycin does not. Objective:To determine the frequency of CNI-macrolide co-prescriptions, the proportion who receive post-prescription monitoring, and the risk of adverse drug events in kidney transplant recipients. Design:Retrospective cohort study. Setting:We used linked health care databases in Alberta, Canada. Patients:We included 293 adult kidney transplant recipients from 2008-2015 who were co-prescribed a CNI and macrolide. Measurements:The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause hospitalization, acute kidney injury (creatinine increase ?0.3 mg/dL or 1.5 times baseline), or death within 30 days of the macrolide prescription. Methods:We identified CNI-macrolide co-prescriptions and compared outcomes in those who received clarithromycin/erythromycin versus azithromycin. We used a linear mixed-effects model to examine the mean change in serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Results:Of the 293 recipients who were co-prescribed a CNI and a macrolide, 38% (n = 112) were prescribed clarithromycin/erythromycin while 62% (n = 181) were prescribed azithromycin. Compared with azithromycin users, clarithromycin/erythromycin users were less likely to have outpatient serum creatinine monitoring post-prescription (56% vs 69%, P = .03). There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between the 2 groups (17% vs 11%, P = .11); however, the risk of all-cause hospitalization was higher in the clarithromycin/erythromycin group (10% vs 3%, P = .02). The mean decrement in eGFR was significantly greater in the clarithromycin/erythromycin versus azithromycin group (-5.4 vs -1.9 mL/min/1.73 m2, P < .05). Limitations:We did not have CNI levels to correlate with the timing of CNI-macrolide co-prescriptions. We also did not have information regarding the indications for macrolide prescriptions. Conclusion:Clarithromycin and erythromycin were frequently co-prescribed in kidney transplant recipients on CNIs despite known drug interactions. Clarithromycin/erythromycin use was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization compared with azithromycin users. Safer prescribing practices in kidney transplant recipients are warranted.

Dataset Information

Quantifying the Race Stratified Impact of Socioeconomics on Graft Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Publications

Quantifying the Race Stratified Impact of Socioeconomics on Graft Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets