Ultrasound Elastography and MR Elastography for Assessing Liver Fibrosis: Part 1, Principles and Techniques.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Tang A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4819982 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Ultrasound Elastography and MR Elastography for Assessing Liver Fibrosis: Part 1, Principles and Techniques.
Tang An A Cloutier Guy G Szeverenyi Nikolaus M NM Sirlin Claude B CB
AJR. American journal of roentgenology 20150423 1
<h4>Objective</h4>The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of ultrasound and MR elastography, including a glossary of relevant terminology, a classification of elastography techniques, and a discussion of their respective strengths and limitations.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Elastography is an emerging technique for the noninvasive assessment of mechanical tissue properties. These techniques report metrics related to tissue stiffness, such as shear-wave speed, magnitude of the complex shear ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Tissue stiffness has long been known to be a biomarker of tissue pathology. Ultrasound elastography measures tissue mechanical properties by monitoring the response of tissue to acoustic energy. Different elastographic techniques have been applied to many different tissues and diseases. Depending on the pathology, patient-based factors, and ultrasound operator-based factors, these techniques vary in accuracy and reliability. In this review, we discuss the physical principles of ultrasound elastography, discuss differences between different ultrasound elastographic techniques, and review the advantages and disadvantages of these techniques in clinical practice.
| S-EPMC5973820 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography as a method to help diagnose clinically substantial fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and, by using MR elastography as a reference standard, to compare various laboratory marker panels in the identification of patients with NAFLD and advanced fibrosis.Materials and methodsThis retrospective study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA complaint. Informed consent was waived. This study was conducted in patients with NAFLD, who were identified by imaging characteristics consistent with steatosis in a prospective database that tracks all MR elastographic examinations. Six laboratory-based models of fibrosis were compared with MR elastographic results as well as fibrosis stage from liver biopsy results. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of each data set were compared.ResultsAmong 325 patients with NAFLD with MR elastographic data, there were 142 patients who underwent liver biopsy within 1 year of MR elastography. When comparing MR elastography results with liver biopsy results, the best cutoff for advanced fibrosis (stage F3-F4, 46 [32.4%] of 142) was 4.15 kPa (AUROC = 0.954, sensitivity = 0.85, specificity = 0.929). This cutoff value identified 104 patients with advanced fibrosis (32.0% of 325 patients). The FIB-4 score (AUROC = 0.827) and NAFLD fibrosis score (AUROC = 0.821) had the best diagnostic accuracy for advanced fibrosis, with high negative predictive values (NAFLD fibrosis score = 0.90 and FIB-4 score = 0.899).ConclusionMR elastography is a useful diagnostic tool for detecting advanced fibrosis in NAFLD. Of the laboratory-based methods, the NAFLD fibrosis and FIB-4 scores can most reliably detect advanced fibrosis.
| S-EPMC3721049 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is expected to increase in prevalence because of the ongoing epidemics of obesity and diabetes, and it has become a major cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Liver fibrosis is associated with long-term outcomes in patients with NAFLD. Liver biopsy is recommended as the gold standard method for the staging of liver fibrosis. However, it has several problems. Therefore, simple and noninvasive methods for the diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis are urgently needed in place of biopsy. This review discusses recent studies of elastography techniques (vibration-controlled transient elastography, point shear wave elastography, two-dimensional shear wave elastography, and magnetic resonance elastography) that can be used for the assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD.
| S-EPMC7313067 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The purpose of this study was to develop an automated method for classifying liver fibrosis stage ≥F2 based on ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) and to assess the system's performance in comparison with a reference manual approach. The reference approach consists of manually selecting a region of interest from each of eight or more SWE images, computing the mean tissue stiffness within each of the regions of interest and computing a resulting stiffness value as the median of the means. The 527-subject database consisted of 5526 SWE images and pathologist-scored biopsies, with data collected from a single system at a single site. The automated method integrates three modules that assess SWE image quality, select a region of interest from each SWE measurement and perform machine learning-based, multi-image SWE classification for fibrosis stage ≥F2. Several classification methods were developed and tested using fivefold cross-validation with training, validation and test sets partitioned by subject. Performance metrics were area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), specificity at 95% sensitivity and number of SWE images required. The final automated method yielded an AUROC of 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.90-0.94) versus 0.69 (95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.72) for the reference method, 71% specificity with 95% sensitivity versus 5% and four images per decision versus eight or more. In conclusion, the automated method reported in this study significantly improved the accuracy for ≥F2 classification of SWE measurements as well as reduced the number of measurements needed, which has the potential to reduce clinical workflow.
| S-EPMC7483774 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo conduct a rigorous evaluation of the repeatability of liver stiffness assessed by MR elastography (MRE) in healthy and hepatitis-C-infected subjects.Materials and methodsA biopsy-correlated repeatability study using four-slice MRE was conducted in five healthy and four HCV-infected subjects. Subjects were scanned twice on day 1 and after 7-14 days. Each slice was acquired during a 14-s breath-hold with a commercially available acquisition technique (MR-Touch, GE Healthcare). Results were analyzed by two independent analysts.ResultsThe intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.85 (90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71 to 0.98) for the between-scan average of maximum stiffness within each slice and 0.88 (90% CI: 0.78 to 0.99) for the average of mean stiffness within each slice for the primary analyst. For both analysts, the average of the mean liver stiffness within each slice was highly reproducible with ICC of 0.93 and 0.94. Within-subject coefficients of variation ranged from 6.07% to 10.78% for HCV+ and healthy subjects.ConclusionMRE is a highly reproducible modality for assessing liver stiffness in HCV patients and healthy subjects and can discriminate between moderate fibrosis and healthy liver. MRE is a promising modality for noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis (CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00896233).
| S-EPMC3176946 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Purpose To investigate the utility of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography-derived mechanical properties in the discrimination of hepatic inflammation and fibrosis in the early stages of chronic liver diseases. Materials and Methods All studies were approved by the institutional animal care and use committee. A total of 187 animals were studied, including 182 mice and five pigs. These animals represented five different liver diseases with a varying combination and extent of hepatic inflammation, fibrosis, congestion, and portal hypertension. Multifrequency three-dimensional MR elastography was performed, and shear stiffness, storage modulus, shear loss modulus, and damping ratio were calculated for all animals. Necroinflammation, fibrosis, and portal pressure were either histologically scored or biochemically and physically quantified in all animals. Two-sided Welch t tests were used to evaluate mean differences between disease and control groups. Spearman correlation analyses were used to evaluate the relationships between mechanical parameters and quantitative fibrosis extent (hydroxyproline concentration) and portal pressure. Results Liver stiffness and storage modulus increased with progressively developed fibrosis and portal hypertension (mean stiffness at 80 Hz and 48-week feeding, 0.51 kPa ± 0.12 in the steatohepatitis group vs 0.29 kPa ± 0.01 in the control group; P = .02). Damping ratio and shear loss modulus can be used to distinguish inflammation from fibrosis at early stages of disease, even before the development of histologically detectable necroinflammation and fibrosis (mean damping ratio at 80 Hz and 20-week feeding, 0.044 ± 0.012 in the steatohepatitis group vs 0.014 ± 0.008 in the control group; P < .001). Damping ratio and liver stiffness vary differently with respect to cause of portal hypertension (ie, congestion- or cirrhosis-induced hypertension). These differentiation abilities have frequency-dependent variations. Conclusion Liver stiffness and damping ratio measurements can extend hepatic MR elastography to potentially enable assessment of necroinflammatory, congestive, and fibrotic processes of chronic liver diseases. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
| S-EPMC5529282 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Preoperative clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols for gliomas, brain tumors with dismal outcomes due to their infiltrative properties, still rely on conventional structural MRI, which does not deliver information on tumor genotype and is limited in the delineation of diffuse gliomas. The GliMR COST action wants to raise awareness about the state of the art of advanced MRI techniques in gliomas and their possible clinical translation or lack thereof. This review describes current methods, limits, and applications of advanced MRI for the preoperative assessment of glioma, summarizing the level of clinical validation of different techniques. In this first part, we discuss dynamic susceptibility contrast and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, arterial spin labeling, diffusion-weighted MRI, vessel imaging, and magnetic resonance fingerprinting. The second part of this review addresses magnetic resonance spectroscopy, chemical exchange saturation transfer, susceptibility-weighted imaging, MRI-PET, MR elastography, and MR-based radiomics applications. Evidence Level: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2.
| S-EPMC10946498 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Preoperative clinical MRI protocols for gliomas, brain tumors with dismal outcomes due to their infiltrative properties, still rely on conventional structural MRI, which does not deliver information on tumor genotype and is limited in the delineation of diffuse gliomas. The GliMR COST action wants to raise awareness about the state of the art of advanced MRI techniques in gliomas and their possible clinical translation. This review describes current methods, limits, and applications of advanced MRI for the preoperative assessment of glioma, summarizing the level of clinical validation of different techniques. In this second part, we review magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST), susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), MRI-PET, MR elastography (MRE), and MR-based radiomics applications. The first part of this review addresses dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, arterial spin labeling (ASL), diffusion-weighted MRI, vessel imaging, and magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF). EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
| S-EPMC10947037 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background Stiffness thresholds for liver MR elastography in children vary between studies and may differ from thresholds in adults. Normative liver stiffness data are needed to optimize diagnostic thresholds for children. Purpose To determine normal liver stiffness, and associated normal ranges for children, as measured with MR elastography across vendors and field strengths. Materials and Methods This was a prospective multicenter cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03235414). Volunteers aged 7-17.9 years without a known history of liver disease were recruited at four sites for a research MRI and blood draw between February 2018 and October 2019. MRI was performed on three vendor platforms and at two field strengths (1.5 T and 3.0 T). All MRI scans were centrally analyzed; stiffness, proton density fat fraction (PDFF), and R2* values were expressed as means of means. Mean and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for liver stiffness were calculated. Pearson correlation coefficient (r), two-sample t test, or analysis of variance was used to assess univariable associations. Results Seventy-one volunteers had complete data and no documented exclusion criterion (median age, 12 years; interquartile range [IQR], 10-15 years; 39 female participants). Median body mass index percentile was 54% (IQR, 32.5%-69.5%). Mean liver stiffness was 2.1 kPa (95% CI: 2.0, 2.2 kPa) with mean ± 1.96 kPa standard deviation of 1.5-2.8 kPa. Median liver PDFF was 2.0% (IQR, 1.7%-2.6%). There was no association between liver stiffness and any patient variable or MRI scanner factor. Conclusion Mean liver stiffness measured with MR elastography in children without liver disease was 2.1 kPa (similar to that in adults). The 95th percentile of normal liver stiffness was 2.8 kPa. Liver stiffness was independent of sex, age, or body mass index and did not vary with MRI scanner vendor or field strength. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Yin in this issue.
| S-EPMC7706876 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundARFI elastrography has been used as a noninvasive method to assess the severity of liver fibrosis in viral hepatitis, although with few studies in schistosomiasis mansoni. We aimed to evaluate the performance of point shear wave elastography (pSWE) for predicting significant periportal fibrosis (PPF) in schistosomotic patients and to determine its best cutoff point.Methodology/principal findingsThis cross-sectional study included 358 adult schistosomotic patients subjected to US and pSWE on the right lobe. Two hundred two patients (62.0%) were women, with a median age of 54 (ranging 18-92) years. The pSWE measurements were compared to the US patterns of PPF, as gold standard, according to the Niamey classification. The performance of pSWE was calculated as the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Patients were further classified into two groups: 86 patients with mild PPF and 272 patients with significant PPF. The median pSWE of the significant fibrosis group was higher (1.40 m/s) than that of mild fibrosis group (1.14 m/s, p<0.001). AUC was 0.719 with ≤1.11 m/s as the best cutoff value for excluding significant PPF. Sensitivity and negative predictive values were 80.5% and 40.5%, respectively. Whereas, for confirming significant PPF, the best cutoff value was >1.39 m/s, with specificity of 86.1% and positive predictive value of 92.0%.Conclusions/significancepSWE was able to differentiate significant from mild PPF, with better performance to predict significant PPF.
| S-EPMC6267962 | biostudies-literature