Dataset Information

Stepped care versus standard trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy for young children.

ABSTRACT: To compare the effectiveness and cost of stepped care trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (SC-TF-CBT), a new service delivery method designed to address treatment barriers, to standard TF-CBT among young children who were experiencing posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS).A total of 53 children (ages 3-7 years) who were experiencing PTSS were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive SC-TF-CBT or TF-CBT. Assessments by a blinded evaluator occurred at screening/baseline, after Step One for SC-TF-CBT, posttreatment, and 3-month follow-up.ClinicalTrials.gov: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01603563.There were comparable improvements over time in PTSS and secondary outcomes in both conditions. Noninferiority of SC-TF-CBT compared to TF-CBT was supported for the primary outcome of PTSS, and the secondary outcomes of severity and internalizing symptoms, but not for externalizing symptoms. There were no statistical differences in comparisons of changes over time from pre- to posttreatment and pre- to 3-month follow-up for posttraumatic stress disorder diagnostic status, treatment response, or remission. Parent satisfaction was high for both conditions. Costs were 51.3% lower for children in SC-TF-CBT compared to TF-CBT.Although future research is needed, preliminary evidence suggests that SC-TF-CBT is comparable to TF-CBT, and delivery costs are significantly less than standard care. SC-TF-CBT may be a viable service delivery system to address treatment barriers.

SUBMITTER: Salloum A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4824681 | biostudies-literature | 2016 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Stepped care versus standard trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy for young children.

Salloum Alison A Wang Wei W Robst John J Murphy Tanya K TK Scheeringa Michael S MS Cohen Judith A JA Storch Eric A EA

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines 20151007 5

<h4>Background</h4>To compare the effectiveness and cost of stepped care trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (SC-TF-CBT), a new service delivery method designed to address treatment barriers, to standard TF-CBT among young children who were experiencing posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS).<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 53 children (ages 3-7 years) who were experiencing PTSS were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive SC-TF-CBT or TF-CBT. Assessments by a blinded evaluator occurred at screening/ ...[more]

PMID: 26443493

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTrauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) is an evidence-based therapist-led treatment for children after trauma. Parents often experience barriers to treatment engagement, including cost. Stepped care TF-CBT (SC-TF-CBT) was developed as an alternative delivery system. Step One is a parent-led therapist-assisted treatment. Step Two provides therapist-led TF-CBT for children who did not benefit from Step One and require more intensive treatment. This study compared SC-TF-CBT to standard TF-CBT in a community-based non-inferiority trial.MethodA total of 183 children (aged 4-12 years) experiencing posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and their caregivers were randomly assigned to SC-TF-CBT or standard TF-CBT within 6 community clinics. Assessments occurred at baseline, mid- and posttreatment, and 6 and 12 months. Primary outcomes included PTSS and impairment. Secondary outcomes included severity, diagnostic status, remission, and response. Treatment cost, acceptability, and satisfaction were measured. Difference and non-inferiority tests were applied.ResultsSC-TF-CBT participants changed at rates comparable to participants in TF-CBT for primary and secondary measures. SC-TF-CBT was non-inferior to TF-CBT for PTSS, impairment, and severity at all time points except for impairment at the 6-month assessment. Attrition did not differ between treatment arms (132 participants were completers). Baseline treatment acceptability was lower for SC-TF-CBT parents, although there was no difference in expected treatment improvements or treatment satisfaction at posttreatment. Based on regression estimates, total costs were 38.4% lower for SC-TF-CBT compared to TF-CBT, whereas recurring costs were 53.7% lower.ConclusionStepped Care TF-CBT provides an alternative way to deliver treatment for some children and parents, with reduced cost for providers and parents.Clinical trial registration informationStepped Care for Children after Trauma: Optimizing Treatment; https://clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02537678.

Project description:ImportanceOrphans and vulnerable children (OVC) are at high risk for experiencing trauma and related psychosocial problems. Despite this, no randomized clinical trials have studied evidence-based treatments for OVC in low-resource settings.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of lay counselor-provided trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) to address trauma and stress-related symptoms among OVC in Lusaka, Zambia.Design, setting, and participantsThis randomized clinical trial compared TF-CBT and treatment as usual (TAU) (varying by site) for children recruited from August 1, 2012, through July 31, 2013, and treated until December 31, 2013, for trauma-related symptoms from 5 community sites within Lusaka, Zambia. Children were aged 5 through 18 years and had experienced at least one traumatic event and reported significant trauma-related symptoms. Analysis was with intent to treat.InterventionsThe intervention group received 10 to 16 sessions of TF-CBT (n = 131). The TAU group (n = 126) received usual community services offered to OVC.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was mean item change in trauma and stress-related symptoms using a locally validated version of the UCLA Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index (range, 0-4) and functional impairment using a locally developed measure (range, 0-4). Outcomes were measured at baseline and within 1 month after treatment completion or after a waiting period of approximately 4.5 months after baseline for TAU.ResultsAt follow-up, the mean item change in trauma symptom score was -1.54 (95% CI, -1.81 to -1.27), a reduction of 81.9%, for the TF-CBT group and -0.37 (95% CI, -0.57 to -0.17), a reduction of 21.1%, for the TAU group. The mean item change for functioning was -0.76 (95% CI, -0.98 to -0.54), a reduction of 89.4%, and -0.54 (95% CI, -0.80 to -0.29), a reduction of 68.3%, for the TF-CBT and TAU groups, respectively. The difference in change between groups was statistically significant for both outcomes (P < .001). The effect size (Cohen d) was 2.39 for trauma symptoms and 0.34 for functioning. Lay counselors participated in supervision and assessed whether the intervention was provided with fidelity in all 5 community settings.Conclusions and relevanceThe TF-CBT adapted for Zambia substantially decreased trauma and stress-related symptoms and produced a smaller improvement in functional impairment among OVC having experienced high levels of trauma.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01624298.

Project description:BackgroundIt has been shown that positive treatment expectancy (TE) and good working alliance increase psychotherapeutic success in adult patients, either directly or mediated by other common treatment factors like collaboration. However, the effects of TE in psychotherapy with children, adolescents and their caregivers are mostly unknown. Due to characteristics of the disorder such as avoidant behavior, common factors may be especially important in evidence-based treatment of posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS), e.g. for the initiation of exposure based techniques.MethodsTE, collaboration, working alliance and PTSS were assessed in 65 children and adolescents (age M = 12.5; SD = 2.9) and their caregivers. Patients' and caregivers' TE were assessed before initiation of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT). Patients' and caregivers' working alliance, as well as patients' collaboration were assessed at mid-treatment, patients' PTSS at pre- and post-treatment. Path analysis tested both direct and indirect effects (by collaboration and working alliance) of pre-treatment TE on post-treatment PTSS, and on PTSS difference scores.ResultsPatients' or caregivers' TE did not directly predict PTSS after TF-CBT. Post-treatment PTSS was not predicted by patients' or caregivers' TE via patients' collaboration or patients' or caregivers' working alliance. Caregivers' working alliance with therapists significantly contributed to the reduction of PTSS in children and adolescents (post-treatment PTSS: β = - 0.553; p < 0.001; PTSS difference score: β = 0.335; p = 0.031).ConclusionsTE seems less important than caregivers' working alliance in TF-CBT for decreasing PTSS. Future studies should assess TE and working alliance repeatedly during treatment and from different perspectives to understand their effects on outcome. The inclusion of a supportive caregiver and the formation of a good relationship between therapists and caregivers can be regarded as essential for treatment success in children and adolescents with PTSS.

Project description:BackgroundThe current standard of care in the treatment of children with physical trauma presenting to non-designated pediatric trauma centers is consultation with a pediatric trauma center by telephone. This includes contacting a pediatric trauma specialist and transferring any child with a potentially serious injury to a regionalized level I pediatric trauma center. This approach to care frequently results in medically unnecessary transfers and may place undue burdens on families. A newer model of care, the "Virtual Pediatric Trauma Center" (VPTC), uses telemedicine to make the expertise of a level I pediatric trauma center virtually available to any hospital. While the use of the VPTC model of care is increasing, there have been no studies comparing the VPTC to standard care of injured children at non-designated trauma centers with respect to patient- and family-centered outcomes. The goal of this study is to compare the current standard of care to the VPTC with respect to family-centered outcomes developed by parents and community advisory boards.MethodsWe will use a stepped-wedge trial design to enroll children with physical trauma presenting to ten hospitals, including level II, level III, and non-designated trauma centers. The primary outcome measures are parent/family experience of care and distress 3 days following injury. Secondary aims include 30-day healthcare utilization, parent/family out-of-pocket costs at 3 days and 30 days after injury, transfer rates, and parent/family distress 30 days following injury. We expect at least 380 parents/families of children will be eligible for the study following an emergency department physician's request for a level I pediatric trauma center consultation. We will evaluate parent/family experience of care and distress using previously validated instruments, healthcare utilization by family recollection and medical record abstraction, and out-of-pocket costs using standard economic analyses.DiscussionWe expect that the findings from this study will inform other level I pediatric trauma centers and non-pediatric trauma centers on how to improve their systems of care for injured children. The results will help to optimize communication, confidence, and shared decision-making between parents/families and clinical staff from both the transferring and receiving hospitals.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04469036. Registered July 13, 2020 before start of inclusion.

Dataset Information

Stepped care versus standard trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy for young children.

Publications

Stepped care versus standard trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy for young children.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets