Dataset Information

Efficacy of CD34+ Stem Cell Therapy in Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy Is Absent in Patients With Diabetes but Preserved in Patients With Insulin Resistance.

ABSTRACT: We evaluated the association of diabetes and insulin resistance with the response to cell therapy in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). A total of 45 outpatients with DCM received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for 5 days. CD34(+) cells were then collected by apheresis and injected transendocardially. Twelve patients had diabetes mellitus (DM group), 17 had insulin resistance (IR group), and 16 displayed normal glucose metabolism (no-IR group). After stimulation, we found higher numbers of CD34(+) cells in the IR group (94 ± 73 × 10(6) cells per liter) than in the no-IR group (54 ± 35 × 10(6) cells per liter) or DM group (31 ± 20 × 10(6) cells per liter; p = .005). Similarly, apheresis yielded the highest numbers of CD34(+) cells in the IR group (IR group, 216 ± 110 × 10(6) cells; no-IR group, 127 ± 82 × 10(6) cells; DM group, 77 ± 83 × 10(6) cells; p = .002). Six months after cell therapy, we found an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction in the IR group (+5.6% ± 6.9%) and the no-IR group (+4.4% ± 7.2%) but not in the DM group (-0.9% ± 5.4%; p = .035). The N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels decreased in the IR and no-IR groups, but not in the DM group (-606 ± 850 pg/ml; -698 ± 1,105 pg/ml; and +238 ± 963 pg/ml, respectively; p = .034). Transendocardial CD34(+) cell therapy appears to be ineffective in DCM patients with diabetes. IR was associated with improved CD34(+) stem cell mobilization and a preserved clinical response to cell therapy.The present study is the first clinical study directly evaluating the effects of altered glucose metabolism on the efficacy of CD34(+) stem cell therapy in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. The results offer critical insights into the physiology of stem cell mobilization in heart failure and possibly an explanation for the often conflicting results obtained with stem cell therapy for heart failure. These results demonstrate that patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and diabetes do not benefit from autologous CD34(+) cell therapy. This finding could serve as a useful tool when selecting heart failure patients for future clinical studies in the field of stem cell therapy.

SUBMITTER: Vrtovec B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4835245 | biostudies-literature | 2016 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy of CD34+ Stem Cell Therapy in Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy Is Absent in Patients With Diabetes but Preserved in Patients With Insulin Resistance.

Vrtovec Bojan B Sever Matjaz M Jensterle Mojca M Poglajen Gregor G Janez Andrej A Kravos Nika N Zemljic Gregor G Cukjati Marko M Cernelc Peter P Haddad François F Wu Joseph C JC Jorde Ulrich P UP

Stem cells translational medicine 20160329 5

<h4>Unlabelled</h4>We evaluated the association of diabetes and insulin resistance with the response to cell therapy in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). A total of 45 outpatients with DCM received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for 5 days. CD34(+) cells were then collected by apheresis and injected transendocardially. Twelve patients had diabetes mellitus (DM group), 17 had insulin resistance (IR group), and 16 displayed normal glucose metabolism (no-IR group). Afte ...[more]

PMID: 27025690

Similar Datasets

Project description:We investigated the effects of cell therapy on local mechanical dyssynchrony (LMD) in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NICM). We analyzed electromechanical data of 30 NICM patients undergoing CD34+ cell transplantation. All patients underwent bone marrow stimulation; CD34+ cells were collected by apheresis and injected transendocardially. At baseline and at 6 months after therapy, we performed electromechanical mapping and measured unipolar voltage (UV) and LMD at cell injection sites. LMD was defined as a temporal difference between global and segmental peak systolic displacement normalized to the average duration of the RR interval. Favorable clinical response was defined as increase in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥5% between baseline and 6 months. Using paired electromechanical point-by-point analysis, we were able to identify 233 sites of CD34+ cell injections in 30 patients. We found no overall differences in local UV between baseline and 6 months (10.7 ± 4.1 mV vs 10.0 ± 3.6 mV, P = 0.42). In contrast, LMD decreased significantly (17 ± 17% at baseline vs 13 ± 12% at 6 months, P = 0.00007). Favorable clinical response at 6 months was found in 19 (63%) patients (group A), and 11 (37%) patients did not respond to cell therapy (group B). At baseline, the two groups did not differ in age, gender, LVEF, or N terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels. Similarly, we found no differences in baseline UV (9.5 ± 2.9 mV in group A vs 8.6 ± 2.4 mV in group B, P = 0.41) or LMD at cell injection sites (17 ± 19% vs 16 ± 14%, P = 0.64). In contrast, at 6 months, we found higher UV in group A (10.0 ± 3.1 mV vs 7.4 ± 1.9 mV in group B, P = 0.04). Furthermore, when compared with group B, patients in group A displayed a significantly lower LMD (11 ± 12% vs 16 ± 10%, P = 0.002). Thus, it appears that favorable clinical effects of cell therapy in NICM patients may be associated with a decrease of LMD at cell injection sites.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) differ in histopathology and prognosis. Although transendocardial delivery of mesenchymal stem cells is safe and provides cardiovascular benefits in both, a comparison of mesenchymal stem cell efficacy in ICM versus DCM has not been done. METHODS AND RESULTS:We conducted a subanalysis of 3 single-center, randomized, and blinded clinical trials: (1) TAC-HFT (Transendocardial Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Mononuclear Bone Marrow Cells in Ischemic Heart Failure Trial); (2) POSEIDON (A Phase I/II, Randomized Pilot Study of the Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Transendocardial Injection of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells Versus Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients With Chronic Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction Secondary to Myocardial Infarction); and (3) POSEIDON-DCM (Percutaneous Stem Cell Injection Delivery Effects on Neomyogenesis in Dilated Cardiomyopathy). Baseline and 1-year cardiac structure and function and quality-of-life data were compared in a post hoc pooled analysis including ICM (n=46) and DCM (n=33) patients who received autologous or allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells. Ejection fraction improved in DCM by 7% (within-group, P=0.002) compared to ICM (1.5%; within-group, P=0.14; between-group, P=0.003). Similarly, stroke volume increased in DCM by 10.59 mL (P=0.046) versus ICM (-0.2 mL; P=0.73; between-group, P=0.02). End-diastolic volume improved only in ICM (10.6 mL; P=0.04) and end-systolic volume improved only in DCM (17.8 mL; P=0.049). The sphericity index decreased only in ICM (-0.04; P=0.0002). End-diastolic mass increased in ICM (23.1 g; P<0.0001) versus DCM (-4.1 g; P=0.34; between-group, P=0.007). The 6-minute walk test improved in DCM (31.1 m; P=0.009) and ICM (36.3 m; P=0.006) with no between-group difference (P=0.79). The New York Heart Association class improved in DCM (P=0.005) and ICM (P=0.02; between-group P=0.20). The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire improved in DCM (-19.5; P=0.002) and ICM (-6.4; P=0.03; ? between-group difference P=0.042) patients. CONCLUSIONS:Mesenchymal stem cell therapy is beneficial in DCM and ICM patients, despite variable effects on cardiac phenotypic outcomes. Whereas cardiac function improved preferentially in DCM patients, ICM patients experienced reverse remodeling. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy enhanced quality of life and functional capacity in both etiologies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: TAC-HFT: NCT00768066, POSEIDON: NCT01087996, POSEIDON-DCM: NCT01392625.

Project description:BackgroundPractice guidelines suggest the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) ≤ 35% despite 3 to 6 months of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). It remains unclear whether this strategy is appropriate for patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), who can experience reverse ventricular remodeling for up to 24 months after the initiation of GDMT. The aim of this study was to assess the longitudinal dynamic relationship between LVEF ≤ 35% and arrhythmic risk in patients with recent-onset nonischemic DCM on GDMT.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted among patients with recent-onset DCM (≤6 months) and recent initiation of GDMT (≤3 months) consecutively enrolled in a longitudinal registry. Risk for major ventricular arrhythmic events or sudden cardiac death was assessed in relationship to LVEF ≤ 35% at enrollment and 6 and 24 months after initiation of GDMT.ResultsFive hundred forty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. LVEF ≤ 35% identified patients with increased risk for major ventricular arrhythmic events or sudden cardiac death starting from 24 months after initiation of GDMT (hazard ratio, 2.126; 95% CI, 1.065-4.245; P = .03). However, LVEF ≤ 35% at presentation or 6 months after enrollment did not have prognostic significance. Sixty-seven percent of 131 patients with LVEF ≤ 35% at 6 months after initiation of GDMT had improved LVEFs (to >35%) by 24 months. This late LVEF improvement correlated with lower arrhythmic risk (P = .012) and was preceded by a reduction of LV dimensions in the first 6 months of GDMT.ConclusionsIn patients with DCM, the present findings suggest that risk stratification for major ventricular arrhythmic events or sudden cardiac death on the basis of LVEF ≤ 35% is effective after 2 years of GDMT, but not after 6 months. In selected patients with DCM, it would be appropriate to wait 24 months before primary prevention ICD implantation.

Dataset Information

Efficacy of CD34+ Stem Cell Therapy in Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy Is Absent in Patients With Diabetes but Preserved in Patients With Insulin Resistance.

Publications

Efficacy of CD34+ Stem Cell Therapy in Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy Is Absent in Patients With Diabetes but Preserved in Patients With Insulin Resistance.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets