Dataset Information

Entropy vs. Energy Waveform Processing: A Comparison Based on the Heat Equation.

ABSTRACT: Virtually all modern imaging devices collect electromagnetic or acoustic waves and use the energy carried by these waves to determine pixel values to create what is basically an "energy" picture. However, waves also carry "information", as quantified by some form of entropy, and this may also be used to produce an "information" image. Numerous published studies have demonstrated the advantages of entropy, or "information imaging", over conventional methods. The most sensitive information measure appears to be the joint entropy of the collected wave and a reference signal. The sensitivity of repeated experimental observations of a slowly-changing quantity may be defined as the mean variation (i.e., observed change) divided by mean variance (i.e., noise). Wiener integration permits computation of the required mean values and variances as solutions to the heat equation, permitting estimation of their relative magnitudes. There always exists a reference, such that joint entropy has larger variation and smaller variance than the corresponding quantities for signal energy, matching observations of several studies. Moreover, a general prescription for finding an "optimal" reference for the joint entropy emerges, which also has been validated in several studies.

SUBMITTER: Hughes MS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4838411 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Entropy <i>vs.</i> Energy Waveform Processing: A Comparison Based on the Heat Equation.

Hughes Michael S MS McCarthy John E JE Bruillard Paul J PJ Marsh Jon N JN Wickline Samuel A SA

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) 20150525 6

Virtually all modern imaging devices collect electromagnetic or acoustic waves and use the energy carried by these waves to determine pixel values to create what is basically an "energy" picture. However, waves also carry "information", as quantified by some form of entropy, and this may also be used to produce an "information" image. Numerous published studies have demonstrated the advantages of entropy, or "information imaging", over conventional methods. The most sensitive information measure ...[more]

PMID: 27110093

Similar Datasets

Project description:US cholesterol guidelines use original and simplified versions of the Framingham model to estimate future coronary risk and thereby classify patients into risk groups with different treatment strategies. We sought to compare risk estimates and risk group classification generated by the original, complex Framingham model and the simplified, point-based version.We assessed 2,543 subjects age 20-79 from the 2001-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) for whom Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP-III) guidelines recommend formal risk stratification. For each subject, we calculated the 10-year risk of major coronary events using the original and point-based Framingham models, and then compared differences in these risk estimates and whether these differences would place subjects into different ATP-III risk groups (<10% risk, 10-20% risk, or >20% risk). Using standard procedures, all analyses were adjusted for survey weights, clustering, and stratification to make our results nationally representative.Among 39 million eligible adults, the original Framingham model categorized 71% of subjects as having "moderate" risk (<10% risk of a major coronary event in the next 10 years), 22% as having "moderately high" (10-20%) risk, and 7% as having "high" (>20%) risk. Estimates of coronary risk by the original and point-based models often differed substantially. The point-based system classified 15% of adults (5.7 million) into different risk groups than the original model, with 10% (3.9 million) misclassified into higher risk groups and 5% (1.8 million) into lower risk groups, for a net impact of classifying 2.1 million adults into higher risk groups. These risk group misclassifications would impact guideline-recommended drug treatment strategies for 25-46% of affected subjects. Patterns of misclassifications varied significantly by gender, age, and underlying CHD risk.Compared to the original Framingham model, the point-based version misclassifies millions of Americans into risk groups for which guidelines recommend different treatment strategies.

Dataset Information

Entropy vs. Energy Waveform Processing: A Comparison Based on the Heat Equation.

Publications

Entropy <i>vs.</i> Energy Waveform Processing: A Comparison Based on the Heat Equation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets