Dataset Information

Do rheumatologists know best? An outcomes study of inconsistent users of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.

ABSTRACT: Current recommendations advocate treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in all patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We analyzed short-term disease outcome in patients according to the consistency of DMARD use in a clinical rheumatology cohort.Patients in an RA registry (n = 617) were studied for DMARD use at semi-annual study time points during the first 18 months of follow-up and were divided into 4 groups according to the number of study time points with any DMARD use [0-1 study time points (n = 31), 2 study time points (n = 24), 3 study time points (n = 77), and 4 study time points (n = 485)]. The primary outcome analyses were performed at 24 months and included Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28-CRP), modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ) change, Short Form Health Survey-12 physical and mental summary scores (SF-12 PCS, SF-12 MCS), EuroQol 5-Dimensional health index (EQ-5D), and radiographic progression. Unadjusted, adjusted, and analyses stratified for seropositivity and disease activity were performed. A secondary analysis investigated 36-month outcomes.No significant 24-month outcome differences could be found between the DMARD use categories. For seropositive patients, there was evidence of a linear trend for SF-12 PCS (p = 0.02) and EQ-5D (p = 0.01) with worse outcomes for inconsistent DMARD users. At 36 months, there was a linear trend for higher DAS28-CRP scores for inconsistent users (p < 0.01).Overall, we found poor correlation between inconsistent DMARD use and short-term disease outcome. However, outcome in the longer term could be negatively influenced by inconsistent DMARD use, as well as short-term outcome in seropositive patients.

SUBMITTER: Mjaavatten MD

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4843117 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Do rheumatologists know best? An outcomes study of inconsistent users of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.

Mjaavatten Maria D MD Radner Helga H Yoshida Kazuki K Shadick Nancy A NA Frits Michelle L ML Iannaccone Christine K CK Kvien Tore K TK Weinblatt Michael E ME Solomon Daniel H DH

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism 20140827 4

<h4>Objective</h4>Current recommendations advocate treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in all patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We analyzed short-term disease outcome in patients according to the consistency of DMARD use in a clinical rheumatology cohort.<h4>Methods</h4>Patients in an RA registry (n = 617) were studied for DMARD use at semi-annual study time points during the first 18 months of follow-up and were divided into 4 groups according to the num ...[more]

PMID: 25257807

Similar Datasets

Project description:The constant use of disease modifying anti rheumatic drugs affects the functioning of multiple organs inside the body. Some drugs are more toxic than others. The present case control investigation was designed to evaluate the comparative toxicity of methotrexate and leflunomide on multiple organs in rheumatoid arthritis patients. For this purpose, 100 subjects with confirmed rheumatoid arthritis condition were recruited form tertiary care center. Whereas 50 age matched controls were recruited from the local healthy population. Participants of the study were categorized into three groups with equal numbers of subjects in each group (n = 50). Group 1 comprised rheumatoid arthritis patients on methotrexate treatment, group 2 included rheumatoid arthritis patients on leflunomide treatment and group 3 were healthy subjects. Cardiac and respiratory response was evaluated by monitoring blood pressure, pulse and breathing rate and spot oxygen saturation. Stress on liver was estimated by measuring change in liver enzymes (alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase) and total bilirubin. While, degree of renal impairment was assessed by calculating glomerular filtration rate, serum creatinine, urinary urea and uric acid. For statistical interpretation, data was subjected to independent student "t" test and analysis of variance (one way ANOVA) for mean variations. Both methotrexate and leflunomide elevated the systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate. Leflunomide maintained the oxygen saturation at 96.7%, whereas methotrexate exerted serious effect on spot oxygen saturation by reducing it significantly to 93.25% than healthy subjects. Hepatotoxicity manifested by sustained use of leflunomide was perceptible in this study group. Whereas, both methotrexate and leflunomide influenced renal function as indicated by marked increase in blood urea nitrogen (P = 0.001), serum creatinine (P = 0.007) and reduced glomerular filtration rate (P<0.0001). However, use of methotrexate demonstrated significant (P<0.0001) reduction in serum uric acid and urinary urea levels. Methotrexate is more injurious to heart, blood vessels and kidneys than leflunomide but it is less noxious to hepatic parenchyma. Contrarily, leflunomide usage is comparatively better option for respiratory, cardiovascular, and renal health but dangerous to liver. Thus, a single drug can't be prescribed for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis for longer management of arthritis patients.

Dataset Information

Do rheumatologists know best? An outcomes study of inconsistent users of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.

Publications

Do rheumatologists know best? An outcomes study of inconsistent users of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets