Dataset Information

Population-based study of intra-household gender differences in water insecurity: reliability and validity of a survey instrument for use in rural Uganda.

ABSTRACT: Hundreds of millions of people worldwide lack adequate access to water. Water insecurity, which is defined as having limited or uncertain availability of safe water or the ability to acquire safe water in socially acceptable ways, is typically overlooked by development organizations focusing on water availability. To address the urgent need in the literature for validated measures of water insecurity, we conducted a population-based study in rural Uganda with 327 reproductive-age women and 204 linked men from the same households. We used a novel method of photo identification so that we could accurately elicit study participants' primary household water sources, thereby enabling us to identify water sources for objective water quality testing and distance/elevation measurement. Our psychometric analyses provided strong evidence of the internal structure, reliability, and validity of a new eight-item Household Water Insecurity Access Scale (HWIAS). Important intra-household gender differences in perceptions of water insecurity were observed, with men generally perceiving household water insecurity as being less severe compared to women. In summary, the HWIAS represents a reliable and valid measure of water insecurity, particularly among women, and may be useful for informing and evaluating interventions to improve water access in resource-limited settings.

SUBMITTER: Tsai AC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4843843 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Population-based study of intra-household gender differences in water insecurity: reliability and validity of a survey instrument for use in rural Uganda.

Tsai Alexander C AC Kakuhikire Bernard B Mushavi Rumbidzai R Vořechovská Dagmar D Perkins Jessica M JM McDonough Amy Q AQ Bangsberg David R DR

Journal of water and health 20160401 2

Hundreds of millions of people worldwide lack adequate access to water. Water insecurity, which is defined as having limited or uncertain availability of safe water or the ability to acquire safe water in socially acceptable ways, is typically overlooked by development organizations focusing on water availability. To address the urgent need in the literature for validated measures of water insecurity, we conducted a population-based study in rural Uganda with 327 reproductive-age women and 204 l ...[more]

PMID: 27105413

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCurrently, there are no outcome measures assessing the ability of people with non-specific low back pain to self-manage their illness. Inspired by the 'Patient Enablement Instrument', we developed the Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP). The aim of this study was to describe the development of the Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP) and investigate content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, responsiveness and floor and ceiling effects.MethodsThe PEI-BP consists of 6 items that are rated on a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale. Measurement properties were evaluated using the COSMIN taxonomy and were based on three cohorts from primary care with low back pain: The content validity cohort (N = 14) which participated in semi-structured interviews, the GLA:D® Back cohort (N = 272) and the test-retest cohort (N = 37) which both completed self-reported questionnaires. For construct validity and responsiveness, enablement was compared to disability (Oswestry Disability Index), back pain beliefs (Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire), fear avoidance (Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire-physical activity), mental health (SF-36), educational level and number of previous episodes of low back pain.ResultsThe PEI-BP was found to have acceptable content validity, construct validity, reliability (internal consistency, test-retest reliability and measurement error) and responsiveness. The Smallest Detectable Change was 10.1 points illustrating that a patient would have to change more than 1/6 of the scale range for it to be a true change. A skewed distribution towards the high scores were found at baseline indicating a potentially problematic ceiling effect in the current population.ConclusionsThe PEI-BP can be considered a valid and reliable tool to measure enablement on people seeking care for non-specific LBP. Further testing of the PEI-BP in populations with more severe LBP is recommended.Trial registrationNot applicable.

Project description:BackgroundParenting practices influence children's health and development. The current study aimed at assessing gender differences in children's perception of the parenting practices of both parents, and in the association between children's oral health behaviors and parenting practices.MethodsA cross-sectional household survey of 6-12 year old children was conducted in a rural area in Northwestern Egypt in 2019. Clinical examination assessed caries and gingivitis. The Alabama Parenting Questionnaire assessed parenting practices in five domains (positive parenting, involvement, inconsistent disciplining, poor monitoring and corporal punishment) and the World Health Organization questionnaire assessed oral health behaviors including sugar consumption and daily toothbrushing. Sugar consumption was the dependent variable in linear regression and daily toothbrushing was the dependent variable in logistic regression. Parenting practices were the explanatory variables adjusting for confounders. Effect modification by child gender was assessed.ResultsThe response rate was 94.1% (n = 433), mean age = 9.9 years, 44.1% boys, 17.8% with daily toothbrushing and mean sugar consumption score = 3.4/8. Girls perceived more mothers' positive parenting than boys (mean = 14.15 and 13.46) and boys perceived more poor monitoring and corporal punishment. Boys and girls differed in the association between sugar consumption and fathers' inconsistent disciplining, poor monitoring (P = 0.004 and 0.02) and mothers' corporal punishment (P = 0.02), and also daily toothbrushing and mothers' involvement, positive parenting (P = 0.05 and 0.02), fathers' positive parenting (P = 0.02), mothers' inconsistent discipling and poor monitoring (P = 0.01 and 0.04).ConclusionsThere were differences between boys and girls in perceiving mothers' and fathers' parenting practices and in the association between these parenting practices and toothbrushing and sugar consumption.

Project description:Understanding and eliminating mental illness stigma is crucial for improving population mental health. In many settings, this stigma is gendered, from the perspectives of both the stigmatized and the stigmatizers. We aimed to find the differences in the level of stigma across different mental disorders while considering the gender of the study participants as well as the gender of the people depicted in the vignettes. This was a population-based, experimental vignette study conducted in Buyende District of Eastern Uganda in 2023. We created 8 vignettes describing both men and women with alcohol use disorder, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and schizophrenia consistent with DSM-5 criteria. Participants from 20 villages in rural Buyende District of Uganda (N=379) were first read a randomly selected vignette and administered a survey eliciting their attitudes (Personal Acceptance Scale [PAS] and Broad Acceptance Scale [BAS]) towards the person depicted in the vignette. We used analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni-adjusted, empirical p-values to compare levels of acceptance across disorders and genders. Attitudes towards people with mental illness, as measured by the PAS, varied across different mental disorders (p=0.002). In pairwise mean comparisons, the greater acceptance of anxiety disorder vs. schizophrenia was statistically significant (Mean [SD] PAS: 2.91 [3.15] vs 1.62 [1.95], p=0.008). Secondary analyses examining differences in acceptance across gender combinations within mental disorders showed that PAS varied across gender combinations for depression (p=0.017), suggesting that acceptance is higher for women with depression than men with depression. In this population-based vignette study from rural Uganda, we found that people with schizophrenia were less accepted compared to people with anxiety disorders. We also found that there was greater acceptance of women with depression than men with depression. Anti-stigma initiatives may need to be targeted to specific disorders and genders.

Dataset Information

Population-based study of intra-household gender differences in water insecurity: reliability and validity of a survey instrument for use in rural Uganda.

Publications

Population-based study of intra-household gender differences in water insecurity: reliability and validity of a survey instrument for use in rural Uganda.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets