Dataset Information

Symptom-related emergency department visits and hospital admissions during ambulatory cancer treatment.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:People with cancer experience symptoms related to the disease and treatments. Symptom distress has a negative impact on quality of life (QoL). Attending to symptoms and side effects of treatment promotes safe and effective delivery of therapies and may prevent or reduce emergency department visits (EDVs) and unplanned hospital admissions (HAs). There is limited evidence examining symptom-related EDVs or HAs (sx-EDV/HAs) and interventions in ambulatory oncology patients. OBJECTIVE:To examine factors associated with sx-EDV/HAs in ambulatory oncology patients receiving chemotherapy and/or radiation. METHODS:This secondary analysis used data from a randomized controlled trial of ambulatory oncology patients (n = 663) who received the web-based Electronic Self-Report Assessment – Cancer intervention (symptom self-monitoring, tailored education, and communication coaching) or usual care with symptom self-monitoring alone. Group differences were described by summary statistics and compared by t test. Factors associated with the odds of at least 1 sx-EDV/HA were modeled using logistic regression. RESULTS:98 patients had a total of 171 sx-EDV/HAs with no difference between groups. Higher odds of at least 1 sx-EDV/HA were associated with socioeconomic and clinical factors. The multivariable model indicated that work status, education level, treatment modality, and on-treatment Symptom Distress Scale-15 scores were signifcantly associated with having at least 1 sx-EDV/HA. LIMITATIONS:This is a secondary analysis not sized to determine cause and effect. The results have limited generalizability. CONCLUSION:Most patients did not experience a sx-EDV/HA. Demographic and clinical factors predicted a sx-EDV/HA.

SUBMITTER: Siefert ML

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4849131 | biostudies-literature | 2015 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Symptom-related emergency department visits and hospital admissions during ambulatory cancer treatment.

Siefert Mary Lou ML Bonquist Traci M TM Berry Donna L DL Hong Fangxin F

The Journal of community and supportive oncology 20150501 5

<h4>Background</h4>People with cancer experience symptoms related to the disease and treatments. Symptom distress has a negative impact on quality of life (QoL). Attending to symptoms and side effects of treatment promotes safe and effective delivery of therapies and may prevent or reduce emergency department visits (EDVs) and unplanned hospital admissions (HAs). There is limited evidence examining symptom-related EDVs or HAs (sx-EDV/HAs) and interventions in ambulatory oncology patients.<h4>Obj ...[more]

PMID: 27119127

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Although homelessness and opioid overdose are major public health issues in the U.S., evidence is limited as to whether homelessness is associated with an increased risk of opioid overdose. OBJECTIVE:To compare opioid-related outcomes between homeless versus housed individuals in low-income communities. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:Cross-sectional analysis of individuals who had at least one ED visit or hospitalization in four states (Florida, Maryland, Massachusetts, and New York) in 2014. MEASUREMENTS:Risk of opioid overdose and opioid-related ED visits/hospital admissions were compared between homeless versus low-income housed individuals, adjusting for patient characteristics and hospital-specific fixed effects (effectively comparing homeless versus low-income housed individuals treated at the same hospital). We also examined whether risk of opioid-related outcomes varied by patients' sex and race/ethnicity. RESULTS:A total of 96,099 homeless and 2,869,230 low-income housed individuals were analyzed. Homeless individuals had significantly higher risk of opioid overdose (adjusted risk, 1.8% for homeless vs. 0.3% for low-income housed individuals; adjusted risk difference [aRD], +1.5%; 95%CI, +1.0% to +2.0%; p < 0.001) and opioid-related ED visit/hospital admission (10.4% vs. 1.5%; aRD, +8.9%; 95%CI, +7.2% to +10.6%; p < 0.001) compared to low-income housed individuals. Non-Hispanic White females had the highest risk among the homeless population, whereas non-Hispanic White males had the highest risk among the low-income housed population. LIMITATIONS:Individuals with no ED visit or hospitalization in 2014 were not included. CONCLUSION:Homeless individuals had disproportionately higher adjusted risk of opioid-related outcomes compared to low-income housed individuals treated at the same hospital. Among homeless individuals, non-Hispanic White females incurred the highest risk. These findings highlight the importance of recognizing the homeless population-especially the non-Hispanic White female homeless population-as a high-risk population for opioid overdose.

Project description:Background Identification of stroke patients at increased risk of emergency department (ED) visits or hospital admissions allows implementation of mitigation strategies. We evaluated the ability of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Information Measurement System (PROMIS) patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collected as part of routine care to predict 1-year emergency department (ED) visits and admissions when added to other readily available clinical variables. Methods and Results This was a cohort study of 1696 patients with ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or transient ischemic attack seen in a cerebrovascular clinic from February 17, 2015, to June 11, 2018, who completed the following PROs at the visit: Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders cognitive function, PROMIS Global Health, sleep disturbance, fatigue, anxiety, social role satisfaction, physical function, and pain interference. A series of logistic regression models was constructed to determine the ability of models that include PRO scores to predict 1-year ED visits and all-cause and unplanned admissions. In the 1 year following the PRO encounter date, 1046 ED visits occurred in 548 patients; 751 admissions occurred in 453 patients. All PROs were significantly associated with future ED visits and admissions except PROMIS sleep. Models predicting unplanned admissions had highest optimism-corrected area under the curve (range, 0.684-0.724), followed by ED visits (range, 0.674-0.691) and then all-cause admissions (range, 0.628-0.671). PROs measuring domains of mental health had stronger associations with ED visits; PROs measuring domains of physical health had stronger associations with admissions. Conclusions PROMIS scales improve the ability to predict ED visits and admissions in patients with stroke. The differences in model performance and the most influential PROs in the prediction models suggest differences in factors influencing future hospital admissions and ED visits.

Project description:BackgroundAs a result of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), there have been widespread changes in healthcare access. We conducted a retrospective population-based study in Alberta, Canada (population 4.4 million), where there have been approximately 1550 hospital admissions for COVID-19, to determine the impact of COVID-19 on hospital admissions and emergency department (ED visits), following initiation of a public health emergency act on March 15, 2020.MethodsWe used multivariable negative binomial regression models to compare daily numbers of medical/surgical hospital admissions via the ED between March 16-September 23, 2019 (pre COVID-19) and March 16-September 23, 2020 (post COVID-19 public health measures). We compared the most frequent diagnoses for hospital admissions pre/post COVID-19 public health measures. A similar analysis was completed for numbers of daily ED visits for any reason with a particular focus on ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC).FindingsThere was a significant reduction in both daily medical (incident rate ratio (IRR) 0.86, p<0.001) and surgical (IRR 0.82, p<0.001) admissions through the ED in Alberta post COVID-19 public health measures. There was a significant decline in daily ED visits (IRR 0.65, p<0.001) including ACSC (IRR 0.75, p<0.001). The most common medical/surgical diagnoses for hospital admissions did not vary substantially pre and post COVID-19 public health measures, though there was a significant reduction in admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a significant increase in admissions for mental and behavioral disorders due to use of alcohol.ConclusionsDespite a relatively low volume of COVID-19 hospital admissions in Alberta, there was an extensive impact on our healthcare system with fewer admissions to hospital and ED visits. This work generates hypotheses around causes for reduced hospital admissions and ED visits which warrant further investigation. As most publicly funded health systems struggle with health-system capacity routinely, understanding how these reductions can be safely sustained will be critical.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Black carbon (BC) is a ubiquitous component of particulate matter (PM) emitted from combustion-related sources and is associated with a number of health outcomes. OBJECTIVES:We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the potential for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality following exposure to ambient BC, or the related component elemental carbon (EC), in the context of what is already known about the associations between exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and cardiovascular health outcomes. DATA SOURCES:We conducted a stepwise systematic literature search of the PubMed database and employed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for reporting our results. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA:Studies meeting inclusion criteria (i.e., include a quantitative measurement of BC or EC used to characterize exposure and an effect estimate of the association of the exposure metric with ED visits, hospital admissions, or mortality due to cardiovascular disease) were evaluated for risk of bias in study design and results. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS:Risk of bias evaluations assess some aspects of internal validity of study findings based on study design, conduct, and reporting and identify potential issues related to confounding or other biases. RESULTS:The results of our systematic review demonstrate similar results for BC or EC and PM2.5; that is, a generally modest, positive association of each pollutant measurement with cardiovascular emergency department visits, hospital admissions, and mortality. There is no clear evidence that health risks are greater for either BC or EC when compared to one another, or when either is compared to PM2.5. LIMITATIONS:We were unable to adequately evaluate the role of copollutant confounding or differential spatial heterogeneity for BC or EC compared to PM2.5. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS:Overall, the evidence at present indicates that BC or EC is consistently associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality but is not sufficient to conclude that BC or EC is independently associated with these effects rather than being an indicator for PM2.5 mass. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER:Not available.

Dataset Information

Symptom-related emergency department visits and hospital admissions during ambulatory cancer treatment.

Publications

Symptom-related emergency department visits and hospital admissions during ambulatory cancer treatment.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure