Dataset Information

Safety of Lifitegrast Ophthalmic Solution 5.0% in Patients With Dry Eye Disease: A 1-Year, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.

ABSTRACT: To evaluate the 1-year safety of lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5.0% in patients with dry eye disease compared with placebo.SONATA (Safety Of a 5.0% coNcentrATion of lifitegrAst ophthalmic solution) was a multicenter, randomized, prospective, double-masked, placebo-controlled phase 3 study (NCT01636206). Adults (?18 years) with dry eye disease (Schirmer test score ?1 and ?10 mm; corneal staining score ?2.0) were randomized 2:1 to lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5.0% or placebo twice daily for 360 days. The primary objective was percentage and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Secondary objectives were ocular safety measures: corneal fluorescein staining, drop comfort, best-corrected visual acuity, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and intraocular pressure over 7 visits. Exploratory objectives included concentration of lifitegrast in plasma.The safety population comprised 331 participants (220 lifitegrast; 111 placebo). There were no serious ocular TEAEs. Overall, 53.6% of participants receiving lifitegrast experienced ?1 ocular TEAE versus 34.2% in the placebo group; most TEAEs were mild to moderate in severity. Rates of discontinuation because of TEAEs were 12.3% (lifitegrast) versus 9.0% (placebo). The most common (>5%) TEAEs occurring in either treatment group were instillation site irritation (burning), instillation site reaction, visual acuity reduced, dry eye, and dysgeusia (change in taste). Ocular safety parameters for lifitegrast were similar to placebo. The mean plasma lifitegrast concentration at 360 days (n = 43) was below the limit of detection. There was no indication of systemic toxicity or localized infectious complications secondary to chronic immunosuppression.Lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5.0% seemed safe and well tolerated in this study, with no unexpected adverse events.

SUBMITTER: Donnenfeld ED

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4859202 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Safety of Lifitegrast Ophthalmic Solution 5.0% in Patients With Dry Eye Disease: A 1-Year, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.

Donnenfeld Eric D ED Karpecki Paul M PM Majmudar Parag A PA Nichols Kelly K KK Raychaudhuri Aparna A Roy Monica M Semba Charles P CP

Cornea 20160601 6

<h4>Purpose</h4>To evaluate the 1-year safety of lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5.0% in patients with dry eye disease compared with placebo.<h4>Methods</h4>SONATA (Safety Of a 5.0% coNcentrATion of lifitegrAst ophthalmic solution) was a multicenter, randomized, prospective, double-masked, placebo-controlled phase 3 study (NCT01636206). Adults (≥18 years) with dry eye disease (Schirmer test score ≥1 and ≤10 mm; corneal staining score ≥2.0) were randomized 2:1 to lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5 ...[more]

PMID: 27055211

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceAn investigation of the treatment effect of lifitegrast ophthalmic solution, 5.0%, in different subgroups by severity of dry eye disease (DED) seems warranted.ObjectiveTo explore the heterogeneity across different subgroups of DED and identify which participants were most likely to achieve clinically meaningful benefit with lifitegrast treatment.Design, setting, and participantsThis post hoc responder analysis was performed using the data from the phase 3 OPUS-2 and OPUS-3 studies, which were 12-week, prospective, double-masked, multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-arm clinical trials that previously demonstrated the efficacy of lifitegrast in DED. Pooled data were stratified into 4 subgroups based on severity of inferior corneal staining score (ICSS; ≤1.5 vs >1.5) and eye dryness score (EDS; <60 or ≥60) at baseline. Data were collected from December 7, 2012, to October 5, 2015, and post hoc analysis was performed from April 14, 2020, to July 30, 2021.InterventionsLifitegrast or placebo twice daily for 84 days.Main outcomes and measuresProportion of participants with (1) a clinically meaningful improvement in signs (ICSS or total corneal staining score [TCSS]) and symptoms (EDS or global visual analog scale [VAS]) and (2) a composite response for a given sign and symptom end point pair at day 84 were measured. Clinically meaningful improvement was defined as at least 30% improvement in symptoms (EDS or global VAS) and either at least a 1-point improvement in ICSS or at least a 3-point improvement in TCSS. For the composite responder analysis, the end point pairs were defined as at least a 30% reduction in EDS and at least a 1-point improvement in ICSS; at least a 30% reduction in EDS and at least a 3-point improvement in TCSS; at least a 30% improvement in global VAS and at least a 1-point improvement in ICSS; and at least a 30% improvement in global VAS and at least a 3-point improvement in TCSS.ResultsIn total, 1429 participants (716 in the placebo group and 713 in the lifitegrast group) were analyzed (1087 women [76.1%]; mean [SD] age, 58.7 [14.3] years). For the overall pooled population, responder and composite responder rates favored lifitegrast vs placebo (odds ratio range, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.05-1.59] to 2.10 [95% CI, 1.68-2.61]; P ≤ .02). In the composite analysis, the subgroup with ICSS of greater than 1.5 and EDS of at least 60 at baseline (ie, moderate to severe DED) demonstrated a 1.70- to 2.11-fold higher odds of achieving clinically meaningful improvement with lifitegrast across all sign and symptom end point pairs (P ≤ .001).Conclusions and relevanceThese post hoc findings suggest that lifitegrast ophthalmic solution, 5.0%, treatment may be associated with a response in participants with moderate to severe signs and symptoms of DED.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02284516.

Project description:BackgroundDry eye disease (DED) is a disorder characterized by loss of tear film homeostasis that causes ocular surface inflammation and damage. The incidence of DED increases with age. Cyclosporine ophthalmic solution 0.09% (CEQUA®; OTX-101), cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (Restasis®; CsA), and lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5% (Xiidra®; LFT) are anti-inflammatory agents indicated for DED. This analysis compared treatment patterns in patients with DED receiving OTX-101, CsA, or LFT.MethodsThis real-world, retrospective, longitudinal cohort study utilized Symphony Health Integrated Dataverse claims from July 2019 to June 2021. The dataset included all patients with OTX-101 claims and patients with CsA or LFT claims randomly selected 2:1 to OTX-101. Patients were sorted into 3 cohorts based on index treatment. Index date was that of first treatment claim, and follow-up period was from index date to end of clinical activity or data availability. Time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), probability of discontinuation, and treatment persistence were assessed for OTX-101 vs. CsA, then OTX-101 vs. LFT. Subgroup analysis was performed based on age and prior DED treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to examine TTD. A logistic model evaluated association between index treatment and discontinuation. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and P-values were reported, with statistically significant associations based on P-values < 0.05.ResultsOverall, 7102 patients (OTX-101 n = 1846; CsA n = 2248; LFT n = 3008) were eligible. Median TTD was 354 days for patients receiving OTX-101 vs. 241 days for CsA and 269 days for LFT. Log-rank test indicated TTD was significantly longer for patients on OTX-101 vs. CsA (P = 0.033). Patients on CsA were 35% more likely to discontinue treatment than patients on OTX-101; OTX-101 and LFT groups had similar discontinuation rates. After 360 days, 49.8% of patients receiving OTX-101 remained on treatment vs. 39.4% of patients on CsA (P = 0.036) and 44.0% of patients on LFT (P = 0.854).ConclusionsPatients receiving OTX-101 remained on treatment significantly longer and were significantly less likely to discontinue treatment than patients on CsA. Older patients remained on OTX-101 significantly longer than CsA. These findings highlight treatment pattern differences in patients with DED receiving these anti-inflammatory agents.

Project description:IntroductionDE-089C is a newly developed long-acting formulation of diquafosol ophthalmic solution with less frequent administration (three times daily) than the currently approved and clinically used diquafosol ophthalmic solution (six times daily), hereinafter referred to as DQS. DE-089C is desirable for achieving better patient adherence in clinical practice for dry eye therapy. The objective of this study was to confirm the efficacy and safety of DE-089C in patients with dry eye compared to placebo.MethodsThis randomized, multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 3 study was conducted in Japan. Patients with aqueous-deficient dry eye satisfying Schirmer's test I results ≤ 5 mm/5 min were included. A total of 337 patients with dry eye were randomized in an equal ratio to treatment with DE-089C or placebo ophthalmic solution, three times daily for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint for efficacy was change in fluorescein corneal staining score from baseline to week 4. The incidence of adverse drug reactions was investigated for safety evaluation.ResultsThe background characteristics of patients in the two groups were similar. Primary endpoint of change in fluorescein corneal staining score at week 4 in the DE-089C group was significantly improved compared with the placebo group (least squares mean difference - 0.51, 95% CI - 0.754 to - 0.269, P < 0.0001). The secondary endpoint of the Lissamine green conjunctival staining score was also significantly improved in the DE-089C group compared to that in the placebo group, while other secondary endpoints were not achieved in this study. Commonly (incidence ≥ 1%) reported adverse drug reactions in the DE-089C group were eye irritation (3.6%) and eye discharge (1.8%) with mild severity, and the incidences of these two events were not higher than those in previous clinical studies on DQS.ConclusionThe efficacy and safety of DE-089C administered three times daily at half the dosage of DQS in patients with dry eye were confirmed in this study.Trial registrationJapan Pharmaceutical Information Center ID, JapicCTI-205177.

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of ophthalmic MIM-D3, a tyrosine kinase TrkA receptor agonist, in patients with dry eye.DesignA prospective, two-center, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled Phase 2 study.MethodsA total of 150 dry eye patients were randomized 1:1:1 to study medication (1% MIM-D3, 5% MIM-D3, or placebo) and dosed twice daily (BID) for 28 days. Key eligibility criteria included exacerbation in corneal staining and ocular discomfort in the Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE(SM)) on two visits, separated by 1 week of BID dosing with artificial tears. Safety and efficacy were evaluated at baseline, throughout treatment, and for 2 weeks post-treatment. The pre-specified primary outcome measures were fluorescein corneal staining post-CAE at day 28 and diary worst symptom scores over 28 days. Secondary outcomes included the pre-, post-, and the change from pre- to post-CAE fluorescein and lissamine green staining in both corneal and conjunctival regions, as well as individual diary symptoms.ResultsThe prespecified primary endpoints were not met. Compared with placebo, fluorescein corneal staining at day 28 was significantly improved (P < 0.05) in the 1% MIM-D3 group for the assessment of change from pre-CAE to post-CAE. In addition, following CAE exposure, patients in the 1% MIM-D3 group showed significant improvements versus placebo (P < 0.05) in inferior fluorescein and lissamine green staining after 14 and 28 days. Compared with placebo, patients in the 5% MIM-D3 group reported significantly lower daily diary scores for ocular dryness (P < 0.05). In a subgroup defined by higher symptom scores during the run-in period, significant treatment effects (P < 0.05) were observed for diary symptoms for both MIM-D3 doses. Ocular adverse events were mild and not considered to be treatment-related.ConclusionTreatment with topical ophthalmic MIM-D3 demonstrated protection against the effects of a CAE challenge on dry eye signs, reduced patient-reported diary symptoms, with a favorable safety profile.

Project description:ObjectiveDry eye disease (DED) is a worldwide source of ocular discomfort. This first-in-human phase 2 clinical study determined the efficacy of treating signs and symptoms of DED using an ophthalmic solution of synthesized mimetic of human collagen (ST-100).DesignThis double-masked, randomized, study compared high (60 μg/mL) and low (22 μg/mL) dose ST-100 to vehicle utilizing the Ora, Inc. Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE) during a 28-day period.ParticipantsParticipants included males and females ≥ 18 years of age with signs and symptoms of DED for ≥ 6 months that worsened during CAE exposure who were not taking any topical prescription therapeutic.InterventionParticipants applied ST-100 or vehicle placebo topically to both corneas (1 drop) twice daily via a blow-fill-sealed preservative-free container.Main outcome measuresThe prespecified primary efficacy sign end point was mean change from baseline (CFB) in total corneal fluorescein staining, and the primary symptom end point was mean CFB in ocular discomfort. A secondary prespecified efficacy end point was CFB in unanesthetized Schirmer's test for tear film production.ResultsOf 160 subjects in the intent-to-treat population (112 female, 48 male, median age 64), 146 completed the study. Total corneal fluorescein staining CFB improved for high-dose ST-100, with superiority over vehicle when both eyes were considered together (2-sample t test: P = 0.0394). High-dose ST-100 was superior to vehicle in Schirmer's CFB for the study eye (least squares mean difference [confidence interval] = 2.3 [0.6, 4.0], P = 0.0094). For study eyes, the proportion of Schirmer's test responders (CFB ≥ 10 mm, Schirmer's responder rate) was 12.2% for high-dose ST-100 versus 0.0% for vehicle (P = 0.0266). The CFB for ocular discomfort score improved in study eyes for high- and low-dose ST-100 (paired t test, P = 0.0133, P = 0.0151, respectively) but without superiority over vehicle (ANCOVA: P = 0.5696, P = 0.8968, respectively). ST-100 Schirmer's responders also demonstrated total elimination of worsening of corneal fluorescein stain during the stress of CAE sessions.ConclusionsST-100 significantly improved tear production and related outcomes in DED and was well-tolerated in reducing symptoms.Financial disclosuresProprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Dataset Information

Safety of Lifitegrast Ophthalmic Solution 5.0% in Patients With Dry Eye Disease: A 1-Year, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.

Publications

Safety of Lifitegrast Ophthalmic Solution 5.0% in Patients With Dry Eye Disease: A 1-Year, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets