Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Self-Assembled Heteroepitaxial Oxide Nanocomposite for Photoelectrochemical Solar Water Oxidation.


ABSTRACT: We report on spontaneously phase ordered heteroepitaxial SrTiO3 (STO):ZnFe2O4 (ZFO) nanocomposite films that give rise to strongly enhanced photoelectrochemical solar water oxidation, consistent with enhanced photoinduced charge separation. The STO:ZFO nanocomposite yielded an enhanced photocurrent density of 0.188 mA/cm2 at 1.23 V vs a reversible hydrogen electrode, which was 7.9- and 2.6-fold higher than that of the plain STO film and ZFO film cases under 1-sun illumination, respectively. The photoelectrode also produced stable photocurrent and Faradaic efficiencies of H2 and O2 formation that were more than 90%. Incident-photon-to-current-conversion efficiency measurements, Tauc plots, Mott-Schottky plots, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements proved that the strongly enhanced photogenerated charge separation resulted from vertically aligned pseudosingle crystalline components, epitaxial heterojunctions, and a staggered band alignment of the components of the nanocomposite films. This study presents a completely new avenue for efficient solar energy conversion applications.

SUBMITTER: Cho S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4869611 | biostudies-literature | 2016 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Self-Assembled Heteroepitaxial Oxide Nanocomposite for Photoelectrochemical Solar Water Oxidation.

Cho Seungho S   Jang Ji-Wook JW   Li Leigang L   Jian Jie J   Wang Haiyan H   MacManus-Driscoll Judith L JL  

Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society 20160413 9


We report on spontaneously phase ordered heteroepitaxial SrTiO<sub>3</sub> (STO):ZnFe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub> (ZFO) nanocomposite films that give rise to strongly enhanced photoelectrochemical solar water oxidation, consistent with enhanced photoinduced charge separation. The STO:ZFO nanocomposite yielded an enhanced photocurrent density of 0.188 mA/cm<sup>2</sup> at 1.23 V vs a reversible hydrogen electrode, which was 7.9- and 2.6-fold higher than that of the plain STO film and ZFO film cases  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5024119 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4895796 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11308772 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8224280 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3864317 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9417454 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10171202 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5866603 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4506493 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8014905 | biostudies-literature